Complete Phase 1 foundation: Tasks 1.1 and 1.2

 Task 1.1 - Project Foundation Setup:
- Repository structure with Python packaging (setup.py, pyproject.toml)
- Development dependencies and requirements
- Contributing guidelines and MIT license
- GitHub workflows for CI/CD (test.yml, release.yml)
- Issue and PR templates for community contributions
- Comprehensive project documentation

 Task 1.2 - Core Client Structure:
- wikijs package with proper module organization
- Core client class foundation in client.py
- Exception hierarchy for error handling
- Base model classes and page models
- Type checking support (py.typed)
- Utility modules and helper functions

📊 Progress: Phase 1 MVP Development now 40% complete
🎯 Next: Task 1.3 - Authentication System implementation

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2025-07-29 13:25:36 -04:00
parent 3554d7d69c
commit 11b6be87c8
31 changed files with 3805 additions and 115 deletions

187
docs/GOVERNANCE.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
# Wiki.js Python SDK - Community Governance
**Project**: wikijs-python-sdk
**Stage**: MVP Development
**Version**: 1.0
**Last Updated**: July 2025
---
## 🎯 Mission Statement
Create a high-quality Python SDK for Wiki.js that serves developers' needs while fostering an inclusive, collaborative community.
**Core Values:**
- **Quality**: Prioritize working code and user experience
- **Simplicity**: Keep processes lightweight and focused
- **Community**: Welcome contributors of all experience levels
- **Transparency**: Open development with clear communication
---
## 👥 Project Roles
### **Maintainer**
**Current**: Project Lead
**Responsibilities:**
- Project direction and roadmap decisions
- Code review and merge approval
- Release management
- Community support and issue triage
**Authority:**
- Final decision on feature additions
- Merge rights to main branch
- Create releases and manage PyPI publishing
### **Contributors**
**Anyone participating in the project**
**How to Contribute:**
- Report bugs with clear reproduction steps
- Suggest features with use cases
- Submit pull requests following our standards
- Help answer questions in discussions
- Improve documentation and examples
**Recognition:**
- All contributors listed in CONTRIBUTORS.md
- Significant contributors highlighted in releases
- Path to maintainer role for consistent contributors
---
## 🚀 Development Process
### **Issue Management**
1. **Bug Reports**: Use issue templates with reproduction steps
2. **Feature Requests**: Describe use case and expected behavior
3. **Questions**: Use GitHub Discussions for general help
4. **Priority**: Focus on MVP completion, then community feedback
### **Pull Request Process**
1. **Fork & Branch**: Create feature branch from `main`
2. **Develop**: Follow coding standards and write tests
3. **Test**: Ensure all tests pass and coverage maintained
4. **Review**: Maintainer reviews and provides feedback
5. **Merge**: Approved changes merged to main
### **Release Process**
- **Version**: Semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH)
- **Frequency**: Regular releases based on feature completion
- **Testing**: All quality gates must pass before release
- **Communication**: Release notes published with each version
---
## 📋 Quality Standards
### **Code Requirements**
- **Tests**: All new features must include tests
- **Coverage**: Maintain >85% test coverage
- **Types**: Type hints required for public APIs
- **Style**: Follow black, isort, flake8 formatting
- **Documentation**: Docstrings for all public methods
### **Review Criteria**
- [ ] Code follows established patterns
- [ ] Tests cover new functionality
- [ ] Documentation updated if needed
- [ ] No breaking changes without discussion
- [ ] Performance impact considered
---
## 🤝 Community Guidelines
### **Expected Behavior**
- Be respectful and constructive in all interactions
- Focus on the code and ideas, not the person
- Welcome newcomers and help them get started
- Share knowledge and learn from others
- Assume good intentions in communications
### **Unacceptable Behavior**
- Personal attacks or harassment
- Discriminatory language or behavior
- Trolling or intentionally disruptive behavior
- Sharing private information without consent
### **Enforcement**
- **Level 1**: Private discussion with maintainer
- **Level 2**: Public warning and guidance
- **Level 3**: Temporary restriction from participation
- **Level 4**: Permanent ban (only for severe violations)
Report issues to: [Maintainer Contact] - all reports handled confidentially.
---
## 📞 Communication Channels
### **GitHub Issues**
- Bug reports and feature requests
- Project planning and roadmap discussions
- Technical questions about implementation
### **GitHub Discussions** *(Coming Soon)*
- General help and usage questions
- Community showcase and success stories
- Brainstorming new ideas and improvements
### **Response Expectations**
- **Issues**: Response within 48-72 hours
- **Pull Requests**: Initial review within 1 week
- **Discussions**: Community-driven with maintainer backup
---
## 🔄 Decision Making
### **For MVP Development**
- **Maintainer Authority**: Final decisions on scope and implementation
- **Community Input**: Gathered through issues and discussions
- **Focus**: Complete MVP first, then expand based on feedback
### **Post-MVP Development**
- **Feature Requests**: Community voting and discussion
- **Breaking Changes**: Require community discussion period
- **Major Decisions**: Seek consensus among active contributors
---
## 📈 Growth & Evolution
### **Path to Contributor Recognition**
1. **First-time Contributors**: Welcomed and guided through process
2. **Regular Contributors**: Recognized in releases and documentation
3. **Core Contributors**: Trusted with triage and review responsibilities
4. **Maintainers**: Full project authority for proven long-term contributors
### **Governance Evolution**
This lightweight governance will evolve as the community grows:
- **10+ Contributors**: Add formal contributor guidelines
- **Community Growth**: Implement more structured decision processes
- **Multiple Maintainers**: Establish maintainer team processes
---
## 🚀 Getting Started
### **New Contributors**
1. **Read** this governance and project README
2. **Browse** open issues labeled `good first issue`
3. **Ask Questions** in GitHub Discussions
4. **Start Small** with documentation or test improvements
5. **Follow** the pull request process
### **Quick Links**
- **[Development Plan](wikijs_sdk_release_plan.md)**: Current roadmap and priorities
- **[Architecture](wikijs_sdk_architecture.md)**: Technical design overview
- **[CLAUDE.md](../CLAUDE.md)**: AI-assisted development workflow
- **[Contributing Guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md)**: Detailed contribution process *(Coming Soon)*
---
**Questions about governance?** Start a discussion or reach out to the maintainer directly. We're here to help and always open to improving our processes!
**Ready to contribute?** Check out our [current development priorities](wikijs_sdk_release_plan.md) and jump in!

237
docs/RISK_MANAGEMENT.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
# Wiki.js Python SDK - Risk Management
**Project**: wikijs-python-sdk
**Stage**: MVP Development
**Version**: 1.0
**Last Updated**: July 2025
---
## 🎯 Overview
This document identifies and addresses key risks for the MVP development phase. As an AI-assisted project in early development, we focus on the most critical risks that could impact successful delivery.
### **Risk Management Approach**
- **Proactive Identification**: Anticipate issues before they occur
- **Practical Mitigation**: Focus on actionable solutions
- **Regular Review**: Assess risks weekly during development
- **Continuous Learning**: Update strategies based on experience
---
## 🔴 High Priority Risks
### **R1: Development Timeline Delays**
**Risk**: MVP development takes longer than 2-week target
**Probability**: Medium | **Impact**: High | **Level**: 🔴 HIGH
**Causes:**
- Underestimated task complexity
- Scope creep during development
- Technical challenges with Wiki.js API integration
- AI session limitations affecting development flow
**Mitigation Strategies:**
-**Strict Scope Control**: No feature additions during MVP development
-**Daily Progress Tracking**: Update completion status in CLAUDE.md
-**Buffer Time**: Built-in 20% buffer for unexpected issues
-**Fallback Plan**: Reduce MVP scope if timeline at risk
**Monitoring:**
- Track actual vs. estimated time for each task
- Weekly milestone reviews
- Early warning if >20% behind schedule
---
### **R2: Wiki.js API Compatibility Issues**
**Risk**: Changes in Wiki.js API break SDK functionality
**Probability**: Medium | **Impact**: High | **Level**: 🔴 HIGH
**Causes:**
- Wiki.js API changes without notice
- Undocumented API behavior
- Version compatibility issues
- Authentication method changes
**Mitigation Strategies:**
-**Version Pinning**: Test against specific Wiki.js versions
-**Graceful Degradation**: Handle API errors without complete failure
-**Documentation**: Clear supported version requirements
-**Testing**: Comprehensive integration tests with real Wiki.js instance
**Monitoring:**
- Test against latest Wiki.js releases
- Monitor Wiki.js changelog and releases
- Community feedback on compatibility issues
---
### **R3: Quality Standards Not Met**
**Risk**: Code quality falls below professional standards
**Probability**: Low | **Impact**: High | **Level**: 🔴 HIGH
**Causes:**
- Rushing to meet timeline
- Skipping tests or documentation
- Inconsistent code style
- Insufficient error handling
**Mitigation Strategies:**
-**Automated Checks**: CI/CD pipeline with quality gates
-**Test Coverage**: Maintain >85% coverage requirement
-**Code Review**: All changes reviewed before merge
-**Documentation**: API docs required for all public methods
**Quality Gates:**
- [ ] Tests: 100% pass rate
- [ ] Coverage: >85% line coverage
- [ ] Types: 100% mypy compliance
- [ ] Lint: 0 flake8 errors
- [ ] Format: 100% black compliance
---
## 🟡 Medium Priority Risks
### **R4: Package Distribution Issues**
**Risk**: Problems publishing to PyPI or package installation
**Probability**: Medium | **Impact**: Medium | **Level**: 🟡 MEDIUM
**Mitigation:**
- Test packaging and installation locally
- Use automated publishing workflow
- Validate package metadata and dependencies
### **R5: Documentation Gaps**
**Risk**: Incomplete or unclear documentation affects adoption
**Probability**: High | **Impact**: Medium | **Level**: 🟡 MEDIUM
**Mitigation:**
- Write documentation alongside code
- Include practical examples for all features
- Test documentation with fresh install
### **R6: Community Reception Issues**
**Risk**: Negative feedback or low adoption
**Probability**: Low | **Impact**: Medium | **Level**: 🟡 MEDIUM
**Mitigation:**
- Focus on solving real developer problems
- Engage with Wiki.js community early
- Gather feedback and iterate quickly
---
## 🟢 Low Priority Risks
### **R7: Performance Issues**
**Risk**: SDK performance doesn't meet expectations
**Probability**: Low | **Impact**: Low | **Level**: 🟢 LOW
**Note**: Performance optimization planned for Phase 3, not critical for MVP
### **R8: Security Vulnerabilities**
**Risk**: Security issues in dependencies or code
**Probability**: Low | **Impact**: Medium | **Level**: 🟢 LOW
**Mitigation**: Automated security scanning in CI/CD pipeline
---
## 📊 Risk Monitoring
### **Weekly Risk Review**
Every week during MVP development:
1. **Assess Current Risks**: Review probability and impact
2. **Check Mitigation Status**: Ensure strategies are working
3. **Identify New Risks**: Add emerging risks to list
4. **Update Action Plans**: Adjust strategies as needed
### **Risk Indicators**
**Red Flags** (Immediate attention required):
- >1 day behind schedule on critical path
- Test coverage drops below 80%
- Major Wiki.js compatibility issue discovered
- Critical bug discovered in core functionality
**Yellow Flags** (Monitor closely):
- Minor delays in non-critical tasks
- Documentation feedback indicates confusion
- Community engagement lower than expected
### **Escalation Process**
1. **🟢 Low Risk**: Handle in normal development process
2. **🟡 Medium Risk**: Discuss in weekly reviews
3. **🔴 High Risk**: Immediate mitigation action required
4. **🚨 Critical Risk**: Consider scope reduction or timeline adjustment
---
## 🔄 Contingency Plans
### **Timeline Recovery Plan**
**If >20% behind schedule:**
1. **Assess**: Identify specific blockers and time needed
2. **Prioritize**: Focus only on core MVP features
3. **Reduce Scope**: Remove non-essential features
4. **Communicate**: Update timeline expectations
**Minimum Viable Features** (Cannot be removed):
- Basic HTTP client with Wiki.js integration
- API key authentication
- Pages CRUD operations (list, get, create)
- Basic error handling
- Package installation via pip
### **API Compatibility Failure Plan**
**If Wiki.js API breaks compatibility:**
1. **Document**: Clearly specify supported Wiki.js versions
2. **Workaround**: Implement fallback behavior where possible
3. **Communicate**: Notify users of compatibility limitations
4. **Update**: Plan fix for next release
### **Quality Failure Plan**
**If quality standards not met:**
1. **Stop**: Halt new feature development
2. **Fix**: Address quality issues first
3. **Review**: Identify process improvements
4. **Resume**: Continue with improved practices
---
## 📈 Risk Learning & Improvement
### **Post-MVP Risk Review**
After MVP completion, conduct comprehensive review:
- **What Risks Materialized**: Which predictions were accurate
- **What We Missed**: Risks that weren't anticipated
- **Mitigation Effectiveness**: Which strategies worked best
- **Process Improvements**: How to improve risk management
### **Future Phase Risk Planning**
Use MVP experience to improve risk management for:
- **Phase 2**: Essential features and community feedback
- **Phase 3**: Production readiness and performance
- **Phase 4**: Enterprise features and scaling
---
## 🎯 Success Criteria
**MVP Risk Management Success:**
- [ ] MVP delivered within 2-week timeline (±20%)
- [ ] All quality gates passed before release
- [ ] No critical bugs discovered in first week after release
- [ ] Package successfully installed by early users
- [ ] Documentation sufficient for basic usage
**Risk Management Process Success:**
- [ ] All high-priority risks actively monitored
- [ ] Mitigation strategies effectively implemented
- [ ] Early warning systems prevented major issues
- [ ] Lessons learned documented for future phases
---
*This risk management plan focuses on MVP development. A comprehensive risk framework will be developed for later phases based on lessons learned and project growth.*

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
# Wiki.js Python SDK - Architecture Overview
**Version:** 1.0.0
**Status:** MVP Design Phase
**Date:** July 2025
---
## 📋 Executive Summary
### Project Vision
Create a professional Python SDK for Wiki.js that provides intuitive API access, robust error handling, and enterprise-grade features through a clean, extensible architecture.
### Core Objectives
- **Developer Experience**: Intuitive, well-documented API
- **Reliability**: Built-in retry logic and graceful error handling
- **Performance**: Efficient resource management and caching
- **Maintainability**: Clean architecture with comprehensive testing
---
## 🏗️ High-Level Architecture
### System Overview
```mermaid
graph TB
subgraph "Client Applications"
A[Python Scripts]
B[Web Applications]
C[CLI Tools]
end
subgraph "SDK Core"
D[WikiJS Client]
E[Authentication]
F[Configuration]
end
subgraph "API Endpoints"
G[Pages API]
H[Users API]
I[Groups API]
J[Assets API]
end
subgraph "Infrastructure"
K[HTTP Client]
L[Error Handling]
M[Caching Layer]
end
subgraph "External"
N[Wiki.js Server]
end
A --> D
B --> D
C --> D
D --> E
D --> F
D --> G
D --> H
D --> I
D --> J
G --> K
H --> K
I --> K
J --> K
K --> L
K --> M
K --> N
```
### Architecture Principles
#### **1. Separation of Concerns**
- Authentication isolated from API communication
- Clear boundaries between endpoint handlers and HTTP transport
- Modular design allowing independent testing
#### **2. Dependency Inversion**
- Abstract interfaces for HTTP clients and authentication
- Pluggable components for caching and configuration
- Easily mockable dependencies for testing
#### **3. Fail-Fast & Graceful Degradation**
- Early validation of inputs and configuration
- Comprehensive error handling with meaningful messages
- Graceful handling of network failures
---
## 🔧 Core Components
### **WikiJS Client**
```python
class WikiJSClient:
"""Main client for Wiki.js API interactions"""
def __init__(self, base_url: str, auth: AuthHandler, config: ClientConfig = None)
# Properties
.pages # Pages API endpoint
.users # Users API endpoint
.groups # Groups API endpoint
.assets # Assets API endpoint
```
**Responsibilities:**
- Central coordination of all API operations
- Authentication and configuration management
- HTTP request/response handling
- Error propagation and logging
### **Authentication System**
```python
class AuthHandler(ABC):
"""Abstract authentication interface"""
def get_headers(self) -> Dict[str, str]
def is_valid(self) -> bool
def refresh(self) -> None
class APIKeyAuth(AuthHandler):
"""API key authentication implementation"""
class JWTAuth(AuthHandler): # Future
"""JWT token authentication implementation"""
```
**Design Features:**
- Pluggable authentication strategies
- Automatic token refresh for JWT
- Header management abstraction
### **API Endpoints**
```python
class BaseEndpoint:
"""Base functionality for all API endpoints"""
class PagesEndpoint(BaseEndpoint):
"""Pages API operations"""
def list(self, limit: int = 50) -> List[Page]
def get(self, page_id: int) -> Page
def create(self, page_data: PageCreate) -> Page
def update(self, page_id: int, **kwargs) -> Page
def delete(self, page_id: int) -> bool
```
**Design Features:**
- Consistent interface across all endpoints
- Type-safe request/response models
- Built-in validation and error handling
### **Data Models**
```python
class BaseModel(Pydantic.BaseModel):
"""Base model with validation and serialization"""
class Page(BaseModel):
id: int
title: str
path: str
content: str
created_at: datetime
updated_at: datetime
# Business logic methods
@property
def word_count(self) -> int
def to_markdown(self) -> str
```
**Design Features:**
- Pydantic-based validation
- Rich domain models with business logic
- Automatic serialization/deserialization
---
## 📊 Data Flow
### Request Flow
```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
participant App as Application
participant Client as WikiJS Client
participant Auth as Auth Handler
participant HTTP as HTTP Client
participant API as Wiki.js API
App->>Client: pages.get(123)
Client->>Auth: get_headers()
Auth-->>Client: {"Authorization": "Bearer..."}
Client->>HTTP: request(GET, /api/pages/123)
HTTP->>API: HTTP Request
API-->>HTTP: 200 OK + Data
HTTP-->>Client: Response Data
Client-->>App: Page Object
```
### Error Handling Flow
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A[API Request] --> B{HTTP Status}
B -->|200-299| C[Success Response]
B -->|400-499| D[Client Error]
B -->|500-599| E[Server Error]
B -->|Timeout| F[Network Error]
D --> G[ValidationError]
E --> H[APIError]
F --> I[ConnectionError]
G --> J[Log & Return Error]
H --> J
I --> J
C --> K[Parse & Return Data]
```
---
## 🗂️ Project Structure
### Directory Layout
```
wikijs-python-sdk/
├── wikijs/ # Main package
│ ├── __init__.py # Package entry point
│ ├── client.py # Main client class
│ ├── exceptions.py # Exception hierarchy
│ ├── models/ # Data models
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── base.py # Base model
│ │ └── page.py # Page model
│ ├── auth/ # Authentication
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── base.py # Auth interface
│ │ └── api_key.py # API key auth
│ ├── endpoints/ # API endpoints
│ │ ├── __init__.py
│ │ ├── base.py # Base endpoint
│ │ └── pages.py # Pages API
│ └── utils/ # Utilities
│ ├── __init__.py
│ └── helpers.py # Helper functions
├── tests/ # Test suite
├── docs/ # Documentation
└── examples/ # Usage examples
```
### Module Responsibilities
| Module | Purpose | Key Classes |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| `client.py` | Main SDK interface | `WikiJSClient` |
| `exceptions.py` | Error handling | `WikiJSException`, `APIError` |
| `models/` | Data structures | `Page`, `User`, `Group` |
| `auth/` | Authentication | `AuthHandler`, `APIKeyAuth` |
| `endpoints/` | API operations | `PagesEndpoint`, `UsersEndpoint` |
| `utils/` | Helper functions | Validation, serialization |
---
## 🔌 Extensibility Design
### Plugin Architecture (Future)
```python
class Plugin(ABC):
"""Plugin interface for SDK extensions"""
def before_request(self, request: Request) -> Request
def after_response(self, response: Response) -> Response
class CachePlugin(Plugin):
"""Caching functionality as a plugin"""
class MetricsPlugin(Plugin):
"""Metrics collection as a plugin"""
```
### Configuration System
```python
@dataclass
class ClientConfig:
# Connection settings
base_url: str
timeout: int = 30
verify_ssl: bool = True
# Features
cache_enabled: bool = False
retry_enabled: bool = True
# Advanced
plugins: List[Plugin] = field(default_factory=list)
```
---
## 🚀 Development Phases
### **Phase 1: MVP (Current)**
- ✅ Core client with HTTP transport
- ✅ API key authentication
- ✅ Pages API with full CRUD
- ✅ Basic error handling
- ✅ Type-safe models
### **Phase 2: Essential Features**
- Users, Groups, Assets APIs
- Enhanced error handling with context
- Configuration management system
- Basic CLI interface
### **Phase 3: Production Ready**
- Retry logic with exponential backoff
- Caching system with multiple backends
- Rate limiting and circuit breaker
- Performance monitoring
### **Phase 4: Enterprise Grade**
- Async support with asyncio
- Plugin architecture
- Advanced authentication (JWT, OAuth2)
- Comprehensive CLI with interactive mode
---
## 🎯 Design Decisions
### **Technology Choices**
| Component | Technology | Rationale |
|-----------|------------|-----------|
| **HTTP Client** | `requests` | Industry standard, reliable, well-documented |
| **Validation** | `pydantic` | Type safety, automatic validation, great DX |
| **Testing** | `pytest` | Powerful, flexible, extensive plugin ecosystem |
| **CLI** | `click` + `rich` | User-friendly, feature-rich, beautiful output |
| **Async** | `aiohttp` | Native asyncio support, high performance |
### **Key Architectural Decisions**
1. **Synchronous First**: Start with sync API, add async later
2. **Type Safety**: Full type hints and runtime validation
3. **Modular Design**: Clear separation of concerns
4. **Configuration**: Support both programmatic and file-based config
5. **Error Handling**: Comprehensive hierarchy with actionable messages
---
## 📈 Quality Standards
### **Code Quality**
- **Type Coverage**: 100% type hints on public APIs
- **Test Coverage**: >90% line coverage maintained
- **Documentation**: All public methods documented
- **Code Style**: Black + isort + flake8 compliance
### **Performance Targets**
- **Cold Start**: <100ms import time
- **Request Latency**: <50ms overhead per request
- **Memory Usage**: <50MB for typical workloads
- **Throughput**: >1000 req/s with connection pooling
### **Security**
- No hardcoded credentials or secrets
- Input validation on all user data
- Secure defaults for all configuration
- Regular dependency security scanning
---
*For detailed implementation specifications, see [Technical Specifications](technical/)*
*For development tasks and coordination, see [CLAUDE.md](../CLAUDE.md)*

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
# Wiki.js Python SDK - Release Plan
**Project Name:** `wikijs-python-sdk`
**Repository:** `https://github.com/yourusername/wikijs-python-sdk`
**License:** MIT
**Target Audience:** Python developers, DevOps engineers, Data scientists
---
## 📋 Project Overview
### Vision Statement
Develop a production-ready Python SDK for Wiki.js that evolves from a simple, functional MVP to a comprehensive enterprise-grade solution through incremental releases.
### Release Philosophy
- **MVP First**: Ship a working, useful product quickly
- **Incremental Value**: Each release adds meaningful functionality
- **Backward Compatibility**: Maintain API stability across releases
- **Community Driven**: Gather feedback and iterate
### Success Metrics
- **Adoption**: >100 PyPI downloads in first month
- **Quality**: >90% test coverage maintained
- **Community**: >10 GitHub stars, >3 contributors
- **Stability**: <1% error rate in production usage
---
## 🎯 Release Timeline
```mermaid
gantt
title Wiki.js SDK Development Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Phase 1: MVP
Project Setup :p1-setup, 2025-07-29, 3d
Core Implementation :p1-core, after p1-setup, 8d
Release v0.1.0 :milestone, p1-release, after p1-core, 1d
section Phase 2: Essential Features
API Expansion :p2-features, after p1-release, 10d
Release v0.2.0 :milestone, p2-release, after p2-features, 1d
section Phase 3: Production Ready
Reliability Features :p3-reliability, after p2-release, 15d
Release v0.3.0 :milestone, p3-release, after p3-reliability, 1d
section Phase 4: Enterprise
Advanced Features :p4-advanced, after p3-release, 20d
Release v1.0.0 :milestone, p4-release, after p4-advanced, 1d
```
---
## 🚀 Phase 1: MVP Release (v0.1.0)
**Target:** 2 weeks from start
**Goal:** Basic, functional Wiki.js integration
### Core Features
- **HTTP Client**: Synchronous requests with basic error handling
- **Authentication**: API key authentication
- **Pages API**: Complete CRUD operations (list, get, create, update, delete)
- **Models**: Type-safe data models with validation
- **Testing**: Comprehensive test suite with >85% coverage
- **Documentation**: API documentation and usage examples
### Success Criteria
- [ ] Package installable via `pip install wikijs-python-sdk`
- [ ] Basic page operations work with real Wiki.js instance
- [ ] >85% test coverage with passing CI/CD
- [ ] Complete API documentation
*Detailed task breakdown available in [CLAUDE.md](../CLAUDE.md)*
---
## 🔧 Phase 2: Essential Features (v0.2.0)
**Target:** 4 weeks from start
**Goal:** Complete API coverage and enhanced usability
### Key Features
- **Complete API Coverage**: Users, Groups, Assets, System APIs
- **Enhanced Error Handling**: Detailed error context and recovery suggestions
- **Configuration System**: File-based and environment variable configuration
- **Basic CLI**: Command-line interface for common operations
- **Improved Documentation**: Comprehensive guides and examples
### Success Criteria
- [ ] All major Wiki.js APIs covered
- [ ] Configuration via files and environment variables
- [ ] Basic CLI functionality working
- [ ] >90% test coverage
- [ ] Performance benchmarks established
---
## ⚡ Phase 3: Production Ready (v0.3.0)
**Target:** 7 weeks from start
**Goal:** Enterprise-grade reliability and performance
### Key Features
- **Retry Logic**: Exponential backoff with jitter for failed requests
- **Circuit Breaker**: Fault tolerance for unreliable connections
- **Intelligent Caching**: Multi-backend caching with smart invalidation
- **Rate Limiting**: Respect API limits and prevent abuse
- **Monitoring**: Performance metrics and health monitoring
- **Bulk Operations**: Efficient batch processing capabilities
### Success Criteria
- [ ] Production-ready reliability features
- [ ] Performance benchmarks show >50% improvement
- [ ] Cache hit ratio >80% in typical usage
- [ ] Zero-downtime error handling
- [ ] Comprehensive monitoring and logging
---
## 🌟 Phase 4: Enterprise Grade (v1.0.0)
**Target:** 11 weeks from start
**Goal:** Full-featured enterprise SDK
### Key Features
- **Async Support**: Complete asyncio integration with aiohttp
- **Advanced CLI**: Interactive mode, progress bars, bulk operations
- **Plugin Architecture**: Extensible middleware and custom auth providers
- **Advanced Security**: JWT rotation, OAuth2, audit logging
- **Enterprise Features**: Multi-tenancy, custom headers, webhooks
- **Performance Optimizations**: Connection pooling, request batching
### Success Criteria
- [ ] Feature parity with official SDKs
- [ ] Async performance >3x sync performance
- [ ] Plugin ecosystem established
- [ ] Enterprise security features complete
- [ ] Comprehensive documentation and tutorials
---
## 📦 Deployment & Distribution
### Release Process
1. **Automated Testing**: All tests pass with quality gates
2. **Security Scanning**: Dependency and code security validation
3. **Performance Benchmarking**: Regression testing
4. **Documentation Update**: Synchronized with code changes
5. **PyPI Publishing**: Automated package distribution
6. **GitHub Release**: Tagged release with changelog
### Version Management
- **Semantic Versioning**: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
- **MAJOR**: Breaking changes
- **MINOR**: New features, backward compatible
- **PATCH**: Bug fixes, backward compatible
### Quality Gates
| Check | Tool | Threshold |
|-------|------|-----------|
| Tests | pytest | 100% pass |
| Coverage | pytest-cov | >90% |
| Types | mypy | 100% pass |
| Lint | flake8 | 0 errors |
| Security | bandit | 0 issues |
| Format | black | 100% formatted |
---
## 🤝 Community & Maintenance
### Community Building
- **Documentation First**: Comprehensive guides and examples
- **Issue Templates**: Structured bug reports and feature requests
- **Contributing Guidelines**: Clear onboarding for new contributors
- **Code of Conduct**: Inclusive community standards
### Long-term Maintenance
- **Regular Updates**: Monthly releases with improvements
- **Security Patches**: Rapid response to security issues
- **Compatibility**: Support for new Wiki.js versions
- **Performance**: Continuous optimization and monitoring
---
## 📈 Success Tracking
### Key Metrics
- **PyPI Downloads**: Measure adoption growth
- **GitHub Engagement**: Stars, forks, issues, PRs
- **Test Coverage**: Maintain >90% throughout development
- **Performance**: Response time and throughput benchmarks
- **Community**: Contributors, issue resolution time
### Milestone Reviews
- **After Each Phase**: Comprehensive retrospective
- **Process Optimization**: Improve development efficiency
- **Community Feedback**: Incorporate user suggestions
- **Technical Debt**: Address accumulated debt
---
*For detailed development tasks and AI coordination, see [CLAUDE.md](../CLAUDE.md)*