personal-projects/leo-claude-mktplace
Template
0
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor(projman): extract skills and consolidate commands

Browse Source 
Major refactoring of projman plugin architecture:

Skills Extraction (17 new files):
- Extracted reusable knowledge from commands and agents into skills/
- branch-security, dependency-management, git-workflow, input-detection
- issue-conventions, lessons-learned, mcp-tools-reference, planning-workflow
- progress-tracking, repo-validation, review-checklist, runaway-detection
- setup-workflows, sprint-approval, task-sizing, test-standards, wiki-conventions

Command Consolidation (17 → 12 commands):
- /setup: consolidates initial-setup, project-init, project-sync (--full/--quick/--sync)
- /debug: consolidates debug-report, debug-review (report/review modes)
- /test: consolidates test-check, test-gen (run/gen modes)
- /sprint-status: absorbs sprint-diagram via --diagram flag

Architecture Cleanup:
- Remove plugin-level mcp-servers/ symlinks (6 plugins)
- Remove plugin README.md files (12 files, ~2000 lines)
- Update all documentation to reflect new command structure
- Fix documentation drift in CONFIGURATION.md, COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md

Commands are now thin dispatchers (~20-50 lines) that reference skills.
Agents reference skills for domain knowledge instead of inline content.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Leo Miranda
2026-01-30 15:02:16 -05:00
parent 8fe685037e
commit 2e65b60725
70 changed files with 3450 additions and 8887 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

154
plugins/pr-review/README.md
View File

@@ -1,154 +0,0 @@
# pr-review
Multi-agent pull request review with confidence scoring and actionable feedback.
## Overview
pr-review conducts comprehensive code reviews using specialized agents for security, performance, maintainability, and test coverage. Each finding includes a confidence score to reduce noise and focus on real issues.
## Commands
| Command | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| `/pr-review <pr#>` | Full multi-agent review |
| `/pr-summary <pr#>` | Quick summary without full review |
| `/pr-findings <pr#>` | Filter findings by category/confidence |
| `/pr-diff <pr#>` | View diff with inline comment annotations |
| `/initial-setup` | Full interactive setup wizard |
| `/project-init` | Quick project setup (system already configured) |
| `/project-sync` | Sync configuration with current git remote |
## Review Agents
| Agent | Focus |
|-------|-------|
| **Security Reviewer** | Injections, auth, data exposure, crypto |
| **Performance Analyst** | N+1 queries, complexity, memory, caching |
| **Maintainability Auditor** | Complexity, duplication, naming, coupling |
| **Test Validator** | Coverage, test quality, flaky tests |
## Confidence Scoring
Findings are scored 0.0 - 1.0:
| Range | Label | Action |
|-------|-------|--------|
| 0.9 - 1.0 | HIGH | Must address |
| 0.7 - 0.89 | MEDIUM | Should address |
| 0.5 - 0.69 | LOW | Consider addressing |
| < 0.5 | (suppressed) | Not reported |
## Installation
Add to your project's `.claude/settings.json`:
```json
{
"plugins": ["pr-review"]
}
```
Requires Gitea MCP server configuration.
## Configuration
Environment variables can be set in your project's `.env` file or shell environment.
| Variable | Default | Description |
|----------|---------|-------------|
| `PR_REVIEW_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD` | `0.7` | Minimum confidence score (0.0-1.0) for reporting findings. Findings below this threshold are filtered out to reduce noise. |
| `PR_REVIEW_AUTO_SUBMIT` | `false` | Automatically submit review to Gitea without confirmation prompt |
### Example Configuration
```bash
# Project .env file
# Only show high-confidence findings (MEDIUM and HIGH)
PR_REVIEW_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD=0.7
# Auto-submit review to Gitea (default: false)
PR_REVIEW_AUTO_SUBMIT=false
```
### Confidence Threshold Details
The confidence threshold filters which findings appear in review output:
| Threshold | Effect |
|-----------|--------|
| `0.9` | Only definite issues (HIGH confidence) |
| `0.7` | Likely issues and above (MEDIUM+HIGH) - **recommended** |
| `0.5` | Include possible concerns (LOW+MEDIUM+HIGH) |
| `0.3` | Include speculative findings |
Lower thresholds show more findings but may include false positives. Higher thresholds reduce noise but may miss some valid concerns.
## Usage Examples
### Full Review
```
/pr-review 123
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
PR Review Report: #123
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Summary:
Files changed: 12
Lines: +234 / -45
Findings: 8 total
🔴 Critical: 1
🟠 Major: 2
🟡 Minor: 3
💡 Suggestions: 2
[Detailed findings...]
VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
```
### Filter Findings
```
/pr-findings 123 --category security
# Shows only security-related findings
```
### Quick Summary
```
/pr-summary 123
# Shows change overview without full analysis
```
## Output
Review reports include:
- Summary statistics
- Findings grouped by severity
- Code snippets with context
- Suggested fixes
- Overall verdict (APPROVE/COMMENT/REQUEST_CHANGES)
## Verdict Logic
| Condition | Verdict |
|-----------|---------|
| Any critical finding | REQUEST_CHANGES |
| 2+ major findings | REQUEST_CHANGES |
| Only minor/suggestions | COMMENT |
| No significant findings | APPROVE |
## Integration
For CLAUDE.md integration instructions, see `claude-md-integration.md`.
## License
MIT

1
plugins/pr-review/mcp-servers/gitea
View File

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
../../../mcp-servers/gitea