initial project setup
This commit is contained in:
1022
docs/projman-implementation-plan.md
Normal file
1022
docs/projman-implementation-plan.md
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
636
docs/projman-plugin-analysis.md
Normal file
636
docs/projman-plugin-analysis.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,636 @@
|
||||
# ProjMan Plugin: Analysis & Design
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Leo has built a sophisticated, working project management system over 15 sprints using:
|
||||
- **Skills** for behavioral guidance
|
||||
- **Python scripts** for Gitea API interaction
|
||||
- **CLAUDE.md** for branch-aware permission control
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Transform this proven system into a reusable, distributable plugin called `projman`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current System Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### What's Working Well
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Three-Chat Architecture**
|
||||
- **Chat 0** (Claude Web): Planning & architecture → generates sprint documents
|
||||
- **Chat 1** (Claude Code): Orchestration → manages branches, generates prompts, tracks progress
|
||||
- **Chat 2+** (Claude Code): Execution → implements features according to prompts
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Branch-Aware Security**
|
||||
```
|
||||
development → Full access
|
||||
feat/* → Full access
|
||||
staging → Read-only code, can modify .env, creates issues
|
||||
main → Read-only code, emergency .env only, creates issues
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Gitea Integration**
|
||||
- Two Python scripts: `create_gitea_issue.py` and `list_gitea_issues.py`
|
||||
- Proper API authentication via environment variables
|
||||
- Structured issue creation with labels, priority, affected files
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Skills System**
|
||||
- `sprint-workflow.md` - Planning phase (Chat 0)
|
||||
- `sprint-orchestrator.md` - Coordination phase (Chat 1)
|
||||
- `sprint-executor.md` - Implementation phase (Chat 2+)
|
||||
- `post-task-doc-sync.md` - Documentation updates
|
||||
- `incident-reporter.md` - Issue creation from staging/prod
|
||||
|
||||
### What Feels Messy
|
||||
|
||||
Leo identified these friction points:
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Skills vs Agents Confusion**
|
||||
> "I don't think skill would be the best way of handling an Agent"
|
||||
|
||||
Current state: Using skills to guide behavior that should be agent personalities
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Manual Script Invocation**
|
||||
Scripts exist but require manual execution:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python ops/scripts/create_gitea_issue.py --title "..." --problem "..." ...
|
||||
python ops/scripts/list_gitea_issues.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Mode Detection Redundancy**
|
||||
Branch detection logic is duplicated across:
|
||||
- CLAUDE.md
|
||||
- Each skill file
|
||||
- Manual checks in workflows
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Context Switching Overhead**
|
||||
User must manually:
|
||||
- Switch between chats
|
||||
- Remember which skill to load where
|
||||
- Copy/paste completion reports between chats
|
||||
|
||||
## Plugin Architecture Design
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Insight: The 3-Agent Model
|
||||
|
||||
Transform the three chats into three distinct agents:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
projman/
|
||||
├── agents/
|
||||
│ ├── planner.md # Chat 0 → Planning Agent
|
||||
│ ├── orchestrator.md # Chat 1 → PM Agent
|
||||
│ └── executor.md # Chat 2+ → Implementation Agent
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. MCP Server: `gitea-mcp`
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** Provide Gitea API access as tools that agents can use
|
||||
|
||||
**Tools to expose:**
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
{
|
||||
"list_issues": {
|
||||
state: "open" | "closed" | "all",
|
||||
labels: string[],
|
||||
assignee: string
|
||||
},
|
||||
"create_issue": {
|
||||
title: string,
|
||||
body: string,
|
||||
labels: string[],
|
||||
assignee: string,
|
||||
priority: "critical" | "high" | "medium" | "low"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"update_issue": {
|
||||
number: number,
|
||||
state: "open" | "closed",
|
||||
body: string,
|
||||
labels: string[]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"get_issue": {
|
||||
number: number
|
||||
},
|
||||
"add_comment": {
|
||||
number: number,
|
||||
body: string
|
||||
},
|
||||
"get_labels": {
|
||||
// Fetches all org + repo labels with metadata
|
||||
include_org: boolean,
|
||||
include_repo: boolean
|
||||
},
|
||||
"suggest_labels": {
|
||||
// Analyzes context and suggests appropriate labels
|
||||
issue_body: string,
|
||||
context: {
|
||||
branch: string,
|
||||
files_changed: string[],
|
||||
is_bug: boolean,
|
||||
components: string[]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Configuration:** `.mcp.json`
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"mcpServers": {
|
||||
"gitea": {
|
||||
"command": "node",
|
||||
"args": ["mcp-server/gitea-server.js"],
|
||||
"env": {
|
||||
"GITEA_URL": "${GITEA_URL}",
|
||||
"GITEA_OWNER": "${GITEA_OWNER}",
|
||||
"GITEA_REPO": "${GITEA_REPO}",
|
||||
"GITEA_API_TOKEN": "${GITEA_API_TOKEN}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Slash Commands
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary commands for user interaction:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
commands/
|
||||
├── sprint-plan.md # /sprint-plan - Start planning a new sprint
|
||||
├── sprint-start.md # /sprint-start - Begin sprint execution
|
||||
├── sprint-status.md # /sprint-status - Check current sprint progress
|
||||
├── sprint-close.md # /sprint-close - Complete sprint, capture lessons learned
|
||||
├── issue-create.md # /issue-create - Quick issue creation
|
||||
├── issue-list.md # /issue-list - List issues with filters
|
||||
├── labels-sync.md # /labels-sync - Sync label taxonomy from Gitea
|
||||
└── deploy-check.md # /deploy-check - Staging/prod environment validation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Example: `/labels-sync`**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: labels-sync
|
||||
description: Sync label taxonomy from Gitea and review changes
|
||||
agent: planner
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are updating the plugin's label reference from Gitea.
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow:**
|
||||
1. Fetch current labels from Gitea (org + repo)
|
||||
2. Compare with local reference (skills/label-taxonomy/labels-reference.md)
|
||||
3. Show user a diff of changes:
|
||||
- New labels added
|
||||
- Labels removed
|
||||
- Description/color changes
|
||||
4. Discuss impact: "The new Type/Refactor label means we should update suggestion logic for architectural changes"
|
||||
5. After approval, update local reference
|
||||
6. Update label suggestion rules if needed
|
||||
|
||||
This ensures the plugin stays in sync with your evolving label system.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Agents
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent: `planner.md`**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: planner
|
||||
description: Architecture analysis and sprint planning expert
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are the Planning Agent for project management.
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Role:**
|
||||
- Analyze business requirements
|
||||
- Make architectural decisions
|
||||
- Break work into implementation steps
|
||||
- Generate sprint planning documents
|
||||
- Create Gitea issues for approved plans
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Personality:**
|
||||
- Ask clarifying questions upfront
|
||||
- Think through edge cases
|
||||
- Consider architectural fit
|
||||
- Document risks explicitly
|
||||
- Never rush to implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Tools:**
|
||||
- gitea.create_issue - Create issues after approval
|
||||
- gitea.list_issues - Check for similar existing issues
|
||||
|
||||
**Branch Awareness:**
|
||||
${BRANCH_DETECTION_LOGIC}
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow:**
|
||||
[... rest of sprint-workflow.md content ...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent: `orchestrator.md`**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: orchestrator
|
||||
description: Sprint execution coordinator and progress tracker
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are the Orchestrator Agent for project management.
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Role:**
|
||||
- Manage sprint execution
|
||||
- Generate lean execution prompts
|
||||
- Track progress and update documentation
|
||||
- Handle Git operations (commit, merge, cleanup)
|
||||
- Coordinate task dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Personality:**
|
||||
- Concise and action-oriented
|
||||
- Track details meticulously
|
||||
- Signal next steps clearly
|
||||
- Never write application code yourself
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Tools:**
|
||||
- gitea.get_issue - Read issue details
|
||||
- gitea.update_issue - Update issue status
|
||||
- gitea.add_comment - Add progress notes
|
||||
|
||||
**Branch Awareness:**
|
||||
${BRANCH_DETECTION_LOGIC}
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow:**
|
||||
[... rest of sprint-orchestrator.md content ...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent: `executor.md`**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: executor
|
||||
description: Feature implementation and code execution specialist
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are the Executor Agent for project management.
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Role:**
|
||||
- Implement features according to execution prompts
|
||||
- Write clean, tested code
|
||||
- Follow architectural decisions from planning
|
||||
- Generate completion reports for orchestrator
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Personality:**
|
||||
- Implementation-focused
|
||||
- Follow specs precisely
|
||||
- Test as you build
|
||||
- Report blockers immediately
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Tools:**
|
||||
- None (uses standard code tools)
|
||||
|
||||
**Branch Awareness:**
|
||||
${BRANCH_DETECTION_LOGIC}
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow:**
|
||||
[... rest of sprint-executor.md content ...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. Skills
|
||||
|
||||
Skills become **supporting knowledge** rather than primary orchestrators:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
skills/
|
||||
├── gitea-api/
|
||||
│ └── SKILL.md # How to use Gitea MCP server effectively
|
||||
├── agile-pm/
|
||||
│ └── SKILL.md # Agile/PMP best practices
|
||||
└── branch-strategy/
|
||||
└── SKILL.MD # Git branching workflow
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5. Hooks
|
||||
|
||||
Automate repetitive actions:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"hooks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "post-task-sync",
|
||||
"event": "task_completed",
|
||||
"action": "run_command",
|
||||
"command": "update-docs",
|
||||
"description": "Sync documentation after task completion"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "staging-incident",
|
||||
"event": "file_changed",
|
||||
"filter": {
|
||||
"branch": "staging",
|
||||
"paths": ["src/**/*.py", "src/**/*.js"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"action": "warn",
|
||||
"message": "⚠️ Code changes on staging branch. Consider creating issue instead."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment-Aware Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Design Decision:** Plugin behavior adapts to Git branch
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// Branch detection in plugin
|
||||
const CURRENT_BRANCH = getCurrentBranch();
|
||||
const MODE = detectMode(CURRENT_BRANCH);
|
||||
|
||||
// Modify agent permissions based on mode
|
||||
switch (MODE) {
|
||||
case 'DEVELOPMENT':
|
||||
// Full access
|
||||
agents.planner.allowGiteaAPI = true;
|
||||
agents.orchestrator.allowFileWrite = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case 'STAGING':
|
||||
// Read-only code, can modify .env, can create issues
|
||||
agents.planner.allowGiteaAPI = true;
|
||||
agents.orchestrator.allowFileWrite = false;
|
||||
agents.orchestrator.allowEnvWrite = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case 'PRODUCTION':
|
||||
// Emergency mode only
|
||||
agents.planner.allowGiteaAPI = true; // Create incidents
|
||||
agents.orchestrator.allowFileWrite = false;
|
||||
agents.orchestrator.allowEnvWrite = true; // Emergency only
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: MCP Server (Week 1)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Replace Python scripts with MCP server
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
1. Build `gitea-mcp` server in Node.js/TypeScript
|
||||
2. Implement 5 core tools (list, create, update, get, comment)
|
||||
3. Test with environment variables from CuisineFlow
|
||||
4. Verify equivalent functionality to existing scripts
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- MCP server can create issues identical to `create_gitea_issue.py`
|
||||
- MCP server can list issues identical to `list_gitea_issues.py`
|
||||
- No regression in functionality
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Agents (Week 2)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Convert skills to agents
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
1. Create `agents/planner.md` from `sprint-workflow.md`
|
||||
2. Create `agents/orchestrator.md` from `sprint-orchestrator.md`
|
||||
3. Create `agents/executor.md` from `sprint-executor.md`
|
||||
4. Add agent-specific tool permissions
|
||||
5. Test agent invocation via commands
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- `/sprint-plan` invokes planner agent correctly
|
||||
- `/sprint-start` invokes orchestrator agent correctly
|
||||
- Agents have distinct personalities and tool access
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Commands (Week 2-3)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Create user-facing slash commands
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
1. Build 6 core commands (plan, start, status, issue-create, issue-list, deploy-check)
|
||||
2. Connect commands to agents
|
||||
3. Add branch detection to command behavior
|
||||
4. Test command flow end-to-end
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- Commands invoke correct agents
|
||||
- Branch restrictions work automatically
|
||||
- User workflow feels natural
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Hooks (Week 3)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Automate repetitive tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
1. Implement post-task documentation sync
|
||||
2. Add staging/production code change warnings
|
||||
3. Auto-update issue status on merge
|
||||
4. Test hook reliability
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- Hooks trigger at correct moments
|
||||
- No false positives
|
||||
- Improve workflow efficiency
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Skills Refactor (Week 4)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Convert orchestration skills to supporting knowledge
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
1. Extract Gitea API patterns → `skills/gitea-api/SKILL.md`
|
||||
2. Extract PM best practices → `skills/agile-pm/SKILL.md`
|
||||
3. Extract Git workflows → `skills/branch-strategy/SKILL.md`
|
||||
4. Remove duplication from agent prompts
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- Skills are referenced by agents, not primary orchestrators
|
||||
- Less token usage per interaction
|
||||
- Knowledge is reusable across agents
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 6: Local Testing (Week 4)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Validate entire plugin in CuisineFlow
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
1. Create local marketplace for testing
|
||||
2. Install plugin in CuisineFlow project
|
||||
3. Run through complete sprint cycle
|
||||
4. Compare to current workflow
|
||||
5. Fix issues and iterate
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- Plugin performs equivalently to current system
|
||||
- Workflow feels smoother, not worse
|
||||
- No major regressions
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 7: Distribution (Week 5)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Package for others to use
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
1. Write comprehensive README
|
||||
2. Add installation instructions
|
||||
3. Document configuration requirements
|
||||
4. Create example `.env` template
|
||||
5. Publish to plugin marketplace
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- Someone else can install and use it
|
||||
- Clear documentation
|
||||
- Configuration is straightforward
|
||||
|
||||
## Directory Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
projman/
|
||||
├── .claude-plugin/
|
||||
│ └── plugin.json
|
||||
├── commands/
|
||||
│ ├── sprint-plan.md
|
||||
│ ├── sprint-start.md
|
||||
│ ├── sprint-status.md
|
||||
│ ├── issue-create.md
|
||||
│ ├── issue-list.md
|
||||
│ └── deploy-check.md
|
||||
├── agents/
|
||||
│ ├── planner.md
|
||||
│ ├── orchestrator.md
|
||||
│ └── executor.md
|
||||
├── skills/
|
||||
│ ├── gitea-api/
|
||||
│ │ └── SKILL.md
|
||||
│ ├── agile-pm/
|
||||
│ │ └── SKILL.md
|
||||
│ └── branch-strategy/
|
||||
│ └── SKILL.md
|
||||
├── hooks/
|
||||
│ └── hooks.json
|
||||
├── .mcp.json
|
||||
├── mcp-server/
|
||||
│ ├── package.json
|
||||
│ ├── tsconfig.json
|
||||
│ ├── gitea-server.ts
|
||||
│ └── types.ts
|
||||
├── README.md
|
||||
├── LICENSE
|
||||
└── CHANGELOG.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 1: MCP vs Direct API Calls in Commands
|
||||
|
||||
**Choice:** Use MCP Server
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:**
|
||||
- Agents can use tools naturally in conversation
|
||||
- Easier to test MCP server independently
|
||||
- Future-proof for adding more integrations (Asana, Linear)
|
||||
- Follows Claude Code best practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 2: Three Agents vs One Agent with Modes
|
||||
|
||||
**Choice:** Three Distinct Agents
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:**
|
||||
- Clear separation of concerns matches Leo's three-chat workflow
|
||||
- Each agent has distinct personality and tool access
|
||||
- User knows exactly which agent they're talking to
|
||||
- Prevents mode confusion
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 3: Branch Detection in Plugin vs CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
**Choice:** Both
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:**
|
||||
- CLAUDE.md provides base-level permissions (file access)
|
||||
- Plugin agents adapt behavior based on branch (tool usage)
|
||||
- Defense in depth - two layers of protection
|
||||
- Plugin works with or without CLAUDE.md
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision 4: Skills as Orchestrators vs Knowledge
|
||||
|
||||
**Choice:** Skills as Supporting Knowledge
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:**
|
||||
- Agents are the primary interface
|
||||
- Skills reduce token usage (loaded only when relevant)
|
||||
- Skills can be shared across agents
|
||||
- Follows Anthropic's Agent Skills spec
|
||||
|
||||
## Validated Requirements from Leo
|
||||
|
||||
**Q1: Asana Integration**
|
||||
- ✅ Build Gitea-only first, add Asana as separate MCP server later
|
||||
|
||||
**Q2: Agent Invocation**
|
||||
- ✅ Via commands only (`/sprint-plan` → planner agent)
|
||||
|
||||
**Q3: Multi-Project Support**
|
||||
- ✅ Two plugins needed:
|
||||
- `projman`: Single-repo project management (build first)
|
||||
- `projman-pmo`: Multi-project orchestration (build second)
|
||||
- **Context:** Leo manages interdependent projects:
|
||||
- CuisineFlow (main product)
|
||||
- CuisineFlow-Site (demo sync + customer gateway)
|
||||
- Intuit Engine Service (API aggregator extraction - imminent)
|
||||
- HHL-Site (company presence)
|
||||
- These have real deployment dependencies and require coordination
|
||||
|
||||
**Q4: Deployment Environment**
|
||||
- ✅ Same plugin on laptop + VPS servers, branch-aware behavior handles differences
|
||||
|
||||
**Q5: Label System**
|
||||
- ✅ Leo has sophisticated 43-label taxonomy at org level (enforced consistency)
|
||||
- ✅ Include label suggestion in v1
|
||||
- ✅ Plugin maintains local reference, syncs from Gitea with agent review
|
||||
|
||||
**Q6: Lessons Learned**
|
||||
- ✅ Wiki-based implementation in v1 (NOT v2)
|
||||
- **Critical pain point:** 15 sprints with no lesson capture causing repeated mistakes
|
||||
- **Real example:** Claude Code infinite loops on same issues 2-3 times
|
||||
- Must capture at sprint close, reference at sprint start
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical:**
|
||||
- ✅ MCP server passes all integration tests
|
||||
- ✅ Agents invoke correctly via commands
|
||||
- ✅ Branch detection works 100% reliably
|
||||
- ✅ No token usage increase vs current system
|
||||
|
||||
**User Experience:**
|
||||
- ✅ Leo completes sprint cycle faster than before
|
||||
- ✅ Less context switching between chats
|
||||
- ✅ Fewer manual script invocations
|
||||
- ✅ Clearer agent personalities
|
||||
|
||||
**Distribution:**
|
||||
- ✅ Another PM can install and use it
|
||||
- ✅ Documentation is clear enough
|
||||
- ✅ Configuration takes <10 minutes
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
**Immediate (Today):**
|
||||
1. Leo reviews this analysis
|
||||
2. Answer open questions (Q1-Q4)
|
||||
3. Decide: build MCP server first or start with agents?
|
||||
|
||||
**Short-term (This Week):**
|
||||
1. Begin Phase 1 (MCP server) OR Phase 2 (agents)
|
||||
2. Set up local marketplace for testing
|
||||
3. Create `plugin.json` manifest
|
||||
|
||||
**Medium-term (Next 2 Weeks):**
|
||||
1. Complete Phases 1-4 (MCP, agents, commands, hooks)
|
||||
2. Test in real CuisineFlow sprint
|
||||
3. Iterate based on friction points
|
||||
|
||||
## Anti-Over-Engineering Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Before building anything, verify:
|
||||
- [ ] Have we done this manually 3+ times? ✅ (15 sprints)
|
||||
- [ ] Is current system actually broken? ✅ (messy, but Leo identified pain points)
|
||||
- [ ] Will plugin reduce friction? ✅ (fewer manual steps, clearer roles)
|
||||
- [ ] Can we build incrementally? ✅ (7-phase plan)
|
||||
- [ ] Is scope contained? ✅ (Gitea only, not all possible features)
|
||||
|
||||
**Verdict:** This plugin is justified. Proceed with confidence.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user