feat: v3.0.0 architecture overhaul
- Rename marketplace to lm-claude-plugins - Move MCP servers to root with symlinks - Add 6 PR tools to Gitea MCP (list_pull_requests, get_pull_request, get_pr_diff, get_pr_comments, create_pr_review, add_pr_comment) - Add clarity-assist plugin (prompt optimization with ND accommodations) - Add git-flow plugin (workflow automation) - Add pr-review plugin (multi-agent review with confidence scoring) - Centralize configuration docs - Update all documentation for v3.0.0 BREAKING CHANGE: MCP server paths changed, marketplace renamed Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
84
plugins/clarity-assist/commands/quick-clarify.md
Normal file
84
plugins/clarity-assist/commands/quick-clarify.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
# /quick-clarify - Rapid Clarification Mode
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Single-pass clarification for requests that are mostly clear but need minor disambiguation.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- Request is fairly clear, just one or two ambiguities
|
||||
- User is in a hurry
|
||||
- Follow-up to an already-clarified request
|
||||
- Simple feature additions or bug fixes
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Echo Understanding
|
||||
|
||||
Restate what you understood in a single sentence:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
"I understand you want [X] that does [Y]."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Quick Disambiguation
|
||||
|
||||
If needed, ask ONE multiple-choice question:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Just to confirm:** Should this [A] or [B]?
|
||||
1. [Option A with brief description]
|
||||
2. [Option B with brief description]
|
||||
3. Both
|
||||
4. Neither / Other approach
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Proceed or Confirm
|
||||
|
||||
If confident (>90%), proceed with a brief confirmation:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
"Got it. I'll implement [X with chosen option]. Starting now."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If less confident, offer a micro-summary:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
"Quick summary before I start:
|
||||
- [Key point 1]
|
||||
- [Key point 2]
|
||||
- [Assumption made]
|
||||
|
||||
Proceed? (Or clarify anything)"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Interaction
|
||||
|
||||
**User:** Add a delete button to the user list
|
||||
|
||||
**Quick-Clarify Response:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
I'll add a delete button to each row in the user list.
|
||||
|
||||
**Should deletion require confirmation?**
|
||||
1. Yes - show confirmation dialog (Recommended)
|
||||
2. No - delete immediately
|
||||
3. Soft delete - mark as deleted but keep data
|
||||
|
||||
[Asking because accidental deletions can be problematic]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Escalation to Full /clarify
|
||||
|
||||
If quick-clarify reveals complexity:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
"This is more involved than it first appeared - there are
|
||||
several decisions to make. Want me to switch to a more
|
||||
thorough clarification process? (Just say 'yes' or 'clarify')"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
For quick-clarify, no formal specification document is needed. Just proceed with the task after brief confirmation, documenting assumptions inline with the work.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user