2026-01-28 19:27:46 +00:00
11 changed files with 967 additions and 6 deletions
--- a/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json
+++ b/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  },
  "metadata": {
    "description": "Project management plugins with Gitea and NetBox integrations",
-    "version": "5.1.0"
+    "version": "5.2.0"
  },
  "plugins": [
    {
--- a/CHANGELOG.md
+++ b/CHANGELOG.md
@@ -4,10 +4,29 @@ All notable changes to the Leo Claude Marketplace will be documented in this fil
 The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/).
-## [Unreleased]
+## [5.2.0] - 2026-01-28
 ### Added
 #### Sprint 5: Documentation (V5.2.0 Plugin Enhancements)
 Documentation and guides for the plugin enhancements initiative.
 **git-flow v1.2.0:**
 - **Branching Strategy Guide** (`docs/BRANCHING-STRATEGY.md`) - Complete documentation of `development -> staging -> main` promotion flow with Mermaid diagrams
 **clarity-assist v1.2.0:**
 - **ND Support Guide** (`docs/ND-SUPPORT.md`) - Documentation of neurodivergent accommodations, features, and usage examples
 **Gitea MCP Server:**
 - **`update_issue` milestone parameter** - Can now assign/change milestones programmatically
 **Sprint Completed:**
 - Milestone: Sprint 5 - Documentation (closed 2026-01-28)
 - Issues: #266, #267, #268, #269
 - Wiki: [Change V5.2.0: Plugin Enhancements (Sprint 5 Documentation)](https://gitea.hotserv.cloud/personal-projects/leo-claude-mktplace/wiki/Change-V5.2.0%3A-Plugin-Enhancements-%28Sprint-5-Documentation%29)
 ---
 #### Sprint 4: Commands (V5.2.0 Plugin Enhancements)
 Implementation of 18 new user-facing commands across 8 plugins.
@@ -55,6 +74,7 @@ Implementation of 18 new user-facing commands across 8 plugins.
 ### Fixed
 - **MCP:** Project directory detection - all run.sh scripts now capture `CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR` from PWD before changing directories
 - **Docs:** Added Gitea auto-close behavior and MCP session restart notes to DEBUGGING-CHECKLIST.md
 ---
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Leo Claude Marketplace - v5.1.0
+# Leo Claude Marketplace - v5.2.0
 A collection of Claude Code plugins for project management, infrastructure automation, and development workflows.
--- a/docs/DEBUGGING-CHECKLIST.md
+++ b/docs/DEBUGGING-CHECKLIST.md
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 **Purpose:** Systematic approach to diagnose and fix plugin loading issues.
-Last Updated: 2026-01-22
+Last Updated: 2026-01-28
 ---
@@ -186,6 +186,47 @@ echo -e "\n=== Config Files ==="
 | Wrong path edits | Changes don't take effect | Edit installed path or reinstall after source changes |
 | Missing credentials | MCP connection errors | Create `~/.config/claude/gitea.env` with API credentials |
 | Invalid hook events | Hooks don't fire | Use only valid event names (see Step 7) |
 | Gitea issues not closing | Merged to non-default branch | Manually close issues (see below) |
 | MCP changes not taking effect | Session caching | Restart Claude Code session (see below) |
 ### Gitea Auto-Close Behavior
 **Issue:** Using `Closes #XX` or `Fixes #XX` in commit/PR messages does NOT auto-close issues when merging to `development`.
 **Root Cause:** Gitea only auto-closes issues when merging to the **default branch** (typically `main` or `master`). Merging to `development`, `staging`, or any other branch will NOT trigger auto-close.
 **Workaround:**
 1. Use the Gitea MCP tool to manually close issues after merging to development:
   ```
   mcp__plugin_projman_gitea__update_issue(issue_number=XX, state="closed")
   ```
 2. Or close issues via the Gitea web UI
 3. The auto-close keywords will still work when the changes are eventually merged to `main`
 **Recommendation:** Include the `Closes #XX` keywords in commits anyway - they'll work when the final merge to `main` happens.
 ### MCP Session Restart Requirement
 **Issue:** Changes to MCP servers, hooks, or plugin configuration don't take effect immediately.
 **Root Cause:** Claude Code loads MCP tools and plugin configuration at session start. These are cached in session memory and not reloaded dynamically.
 **What requires a session restart:**
 - MCP server code changes (Python files in `mcp-servers/`)
 - Changes to `.mcp.json` files
 - Changes to `hooks/hooks.json`
 - Changes to `plugin.json`
 - Adding new MCP tools or modifying tool signatures
 **What does NOT require a restart:**
 - Command/skill markdown files (`.md`) - these are read on invocation
 - Agent markdown files - read when agent is invoked
 **Correct workflow after plugin changes:**
 1. Make changes to source files
 2. Run `./scripts/verify-hooks.sh` to validate
 3. Inform user: "Please restart Claude Code for changes to take effect"
 4. **Do NOT clear cache mid-session** - see "Cache Clearing" section
 ---
--- a/mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/gitea_client.py
+++ b/mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/gitea_client.py
@@ -135,9 +135,24 @@ class GiteaClient:
        body: Optional[str] = None,
        state: Optional[str] = None,
        labels: Optional[List[str]] = None,
        milestone: Optional[int] = None,
        repo: Optional[str] = None
    ) -> Dict:
-        """Update existing issue. Repo must be 'owner/repo' format."""
+        """
        Update existing issue.
        Args:
            issue_number: Issue number to update
            title: New title (optional)
            body: New body (optional)
            state: New state - 'open' or 'closed' (optional)
            labels: New labels (optional)
            milestone: Milestone ID to assign (optional)
            repo: Repository in 'owner/repo' format
        Returns:
            Updated issue dictionary
        """
        owner, target_repo = self._parse_repo(repo)
        url = f"{self.base_url}/repos/{owner}/{target_repo}/issues/{issue_number}"
        data = {}
@@ -149,6 +164,8 @@ class GiteaClient:
            data['state'] = state
        if labels is not None:
            data['labels'] = labels
        if milestone is not None:
            data['milestone'] = milestone
        logger.info(f"Updating issue #{issue_number} in {owner}/{target_repo}")
        response = self.session.patch(url, json=data)
        response.raise_for_status()
--- a/mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/server.py
+++ b/mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/server.py
@@ -168,6 +168,10 @@ class GiteaMCPServer:
                                "items": {"type": "string"},
                                "description": "New labels"
                            },
                            "milestone": {
                                "type": "integer",
                                "description": "Milestone ID to assign"
                            },
                            "repo": {
                                "type": "string",
                                "description": "Repository name (for PMO mode)"
--- a/mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/tools/issues.py
+++ b/mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/tools/issues.py
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ class IssueTools:
        body: Optional[str] = None,
        state: Optional[str] = None,
        labels: Optional[List[str]] = None,
        milestone: Optional[int] = None,
        repo: Optional[str] = None
    ) -> Dict:
        """
@@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ class IssueTools:
            body: New body (optional)
            state: New state - 'open' or 'closed' (optional)
            labels: New labels (optional)
            milestone: Milestone ID to assign (optional)
            repo: Override configured repo (for PMO multi-repo)
        Returns:
@@ -229,7 +231,7 @@ class IssueTools:
        loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
        return await loop.run_in_executor(
            None,
-            lambda: self.gitea.update_issue(issue_number, title, body, state, labels, repo)
+            lambda: self.gitea.update_issue(issue_number, title, body, state, labels, milestone, repo)
        )
    async def add_comment(
--- a/plugins/clarity-assist/README.md
+++ b/plugins/clarity-assist/README.md
@@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ After clarification, you receive a structured specification:
 [List of assumptions]
 ```
 ## Documentation
 - [Neurodivergent Support Guide](docs/ND-SUPPORT.md) - How clarity-assist supports ND users with executive function challenges and cognitive differences
 ## Integration
 For CLAUDE.md integration instructions, see `claude-md-integration.md`.
--- a/plugins/clarity-assist/docs/ND-SUPPORT.md
+++ b/plugins/clarity-assist/docs/ND-SUPPORT.md
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
 # Neurodivergent Support in clarity-assist
 This document describes how clarity-assist is designed to support users with neurodivergent traits, including ADHD, autism, anxiety, and other conditions that affect executive function, sensory processing, or cognitive style.
 ## Overview
 ### Purpose
 clarity-assist exists to help all users transform vague or incomplete requests into clear, actionable specifications. For neurodivergent users specifically, it addresses common challenges:
 - **Executive function difficulties** - Breaking down complex tasks, getting started, managing scope
 - **Working memory limitations** - Keeping track of context across long conversations
 - **Decision fatigue** - Facing too many open-ended choices
 - **Processing style differences** - Preferring structured, predictable interactions
 - **Anxiety around uncertainty** - Needing clear expectations and explicit confirmation
 ### Philosophy
 Our design philosophy centers on three principles:
 1. **Reduce cognitive load** - Never force the user to hold too much in their head at once
 2. **Provide structure** - Use consistent, predictable patterns for all interactions
 3. **Respect different communication styles** - Accommodate rather than assume one "right" way to think
 ## Features for ND Users
 ### 1. Reduced Cognitive Load
 **Prompt Simplification**
 - The 4-D methodology (Deconstruct, Diagnose, Develop, Deliver) breaks down complex requests into manageable phases
 - Users never need to specify everything upfront - clarification happens incrementally
 **Task Breakdown**
 - Large requests are decomposed into explicit components
 - Dependencies and relationships are surfaced rather than left implicit
 - Scope boundaries are clearly defined (in-scope vs. out-of-scope)
 ### 2. Structured Output
 **Consistent Formatting**
 - Every clarification session produces the same structured specification:
  - Summary (1-2 sentences)
  - Scope (In/Out)
  - Requirements table (numbered, prioritized)
  - Assumptions list
 - This predictability reduces the mental effort of parsing responses
 **Predictable Patterns**
 - Questions always follow the same format
 - Progress summaries appear at regular intervals
 - Escalation (simple to complex) is always offered, never forced
 **Bulleted Lists Over Prose**
 - Requirements are presented as scannable lists, not paragraphs
 - Options are numbered for easy reference
 - Key information is highlighted with bold labels
 ### 3. Customizable Verbosity
 **Detail Levels**
 - `/clarify` - Full methodology for complex requests (more thorough, more questions)
 - `/quick-clarify` - Rapid mode for simple disambiguation (fewer questions, faster)
 **User Control**
 - Users can always say "that's enough detail" to end questioning early
 - The plugin offers to break sessions into smaller parts
 - "Good enough for now" is explicitly validated as an acceptable outcome
 ### 4. Vagueness Detection
 The `UserPromptSubmit` hook automatically detects prompts that might benefit from clarification and gently suggests using `/clarify`.
 **Detection Signals**
 - Short prompts (< 10 words) without specific technical terms
 - Vague action phrases: "help me", "fix this", "make it better"
 - Ambiguous scope words: "somehow", "something", "stuff", "etc."
 - Open questions without context
 **Non-Blocking Approach**
 - The hook never prevents you from proceeding
 - It provides a suggestion with a vagueness score (percentage)
 - You can disable auto-suggestions entirely via environment variable
 ### 5. Focus Aids
 **Task Prioritization**
 - Requirements are tagged as Must/Should/Could/Won't (MoSCoW)
 - Critical items are separated from nice-to-haves
 - Scope creep is explicitly called out and deferred
 **Context Switching Warnings**
 - When questions touch multiple areas, the plugin acknowledges the complexity
 - Offers to focus on one aspect at a time
 - Summarizes frequently to rebuild context after interruptions
 ## How It Works
 ### The UserPromptSubmit Hook
 When you submit a prompt, the vagueness detection hook (`hooks/vagueness-check.sh`) runs automatically:
 ```
 User submits prompt
       |
       v
 Hook reads prompt from stdin
       |
       v
 Skip if: empty, starts with /, or contains file paths
       |
       v
 Calculate vagueness score (0.0 - 1.0)
  - Short prompts: +0.3
  - Vague action phrases: +0.2
  - Ambiguous scope words: +0.15
  - Missing technical specifics: +0.2
  - Short questions without context: +0.15
       |
       v
 If score >= threshold (default 0.6):
  - Output gentle suggestion with [clarity-assist] prefix
  - Show vagueness percentage
       |
       v
 Exit 0 (always non-blocking)
 ```
 ### Example Hook Output
 ```
 [clarity-assist] Your prompt could benefit from more clarity.
 [clarity-assist] Consider running /clarity-assist to refine your request.
 [clarity-assist] (Vagueness score: 65% - this is a suggestion, not a block)
 ```
 ### The 4-D Methodology
 | Phase | What Happens | ND Benefit |
 |-------|--------------|------------|
 | **Deconstruct** | Break request into components | Shows the full picture without overwhelming |
 | **Diagnose** | Identify gaps and conflicts | Surfaces hidden assumptions |
 | **Develop** | Ask structured questions | Option-based, chunked, contextual |
 | **Deliver** | Produce specification | Consistent, scannable format |
 ## Usage Examples
 ### Before: Vague Request
 ```
 User: Make the app faster
 ```
 This triggers vagueness detection because:
 - Short (4 words)
 - Vague action ("make")
 - No specific technical context
 - No measurable outcome
 ### After: Clarified with /clarify
 ```
 User: /clarify Make the app faster
 Claude: Let me help clarify what kind of performance improvements you're looking for.
 **What type of slowness are you experiencing?**
 1. Initial page load takes too long
 2. Interactions feel sluggish (clicking, typing)
 3. API calls are slow
 4. All of the above
 5. Other
 [I'm asking because each has very different solutions]
 ```
 ```
 User: 1
 Claude: Initial page load - got it.
 **What's an acceptable load time for you?**
 1. Under 1 second (aggressive)
 2. Under 2 seconds (standard)
 3. Under 3 seconds (relaxed)
 4. I don't have a specific target
 [This helps me know whether to suggest quick wins or a major optimization effort]
 ```
 After 2-3 more questions, the user receives:
 ```markdown
 ## Clarified Request
 ### Summary
 Optimize initial page load time to under 2 seconds by addressing bundle size and initial render blocking resources.
 ### Scope
 **In Scope:**
 - Bundle analysis and splitting
 - Lazy loading non-critical components
 - Image optimization
 - CSS/JS minification check
 **Out of Scope:**
 - Backend API optimization
 - Database query performance
 - CDN setup
 ### Requirements
 | # | Requirement | Priority | Notes |
 |---|-------------|----------|-------|
 | 1 | Page loads in < 2s on 4G | Must | Measured via Lighthouse |
 | 2 | Largest contentful paint < 1.5s | Should | Core Web Vital |
 | 3 | No layout shift after load | Should | CLS < 0.1 |
 ### Assumptions
 - Current load time is > 3 seconds (based on "too long" description)
 - Target browsers: modern evergreen (Chrome, Firefox, Safari)
 - Build tooling already configured (webpack/vite)
 ```
 ### Common Patterns Detected
 | Pattern | Example | What It Triggers |
 |---------|---------|------------------|
 | Missing context | "Fix the bug" | "Which bug? In which file or feature?" |
 | Ambiguous scope | "Update the user stuff" | "What specifically needs updating?" |
 | Unclear goals | "Make it better" | "Better in what way? Faster? Cleaner? More features?" |
 | Implicit knowledge | "Do it like last time" | "I don't have context from previous sessions" |
 | Conflicting requests | "Keep it simple but add everything" | "Which matters more: simplicity or completeness?" |
 ### Quick-Clarify Example
 For simpler requests that just need minor disambiguation:
 ```
 User: /quick-clarify Add a delete button to the user list
 Claude: I'll add a delete button to each row in the user list.
 **Should deletion require confirmation?**
 1. Yes - show confirmation dialog (Recommended)
 2. No - delete immediately
 3. Soft delete - mark as deleted but keep data
 [Asking because accidental deletions can be problematic]
 ```
 ```
 User: 1
 Claude: Got it. I'll implement a delete button with confirmation dialog. Starting now.
 ```
 ## Configuration Options
 ### Environment Variables
 | Variable | Default | Description |
 |----------|---------|-------------|
 | `CLARITY_ASSIST_AUTO_SUGGEST` | `true` | Enable/disable automatic vagueness detection |
 | `CLARITY_ASSIST_VAGUENESS_THRESHOLD` | `0.6` | Score threshold to trigger suggestion (0.0-1.0) |
 ### Disabling Auto-Suggestions
 If you find the vagueness detection unhelpful, disable it in your shell profile or `.env`:
 ```bash
 export CLARITY_ASSIST_AUTO_SUGGEST=false
 ```
 ### Adjusting Sensitivity
 To make detection more or less sensitive:
 ```bash
 # More sensitive (suggests more often)
 export CLARITY_ASSIST_VAGUENESS_THRESHOLD=0.4
 # Less sensitive (only very vague prompts)
 export CLARITY_ASSIST_VAGUENESS_THRESHOLD=0.8
 ```
 ## Tips for ND Users
 ### If You're Feeling Overwhelmed
 - Use `/quick-clarify` instead of `/clarify` for faster interactions
 - Say "let's focus on just one thing" to narrow scope
 - Ask to "pause and summarize" at any point
 - It's OK to say "I don't know" - the plugin will offer concrete alternatives
 ### If You Have Executive Function Challenges
 - Start with `/clarify` even for tasks you think are simple - it helps with planning
 - The structured specification can serve as a checklist
 - Use the scope boundaries to prevent scope creep
 ### If You Prefer Detailed Structure
 - The 4-D methodology provides a predictable framework
 - All output follows consistent formatting
 - Questions always offer numbered options
 ### If You Have Anxiety About Getting It Right
 - The plugin validates "good enough for now" as acceptable
 - You can always revisit and change earlier answers
 - Assumptions are explicitly listed - nothing is hidden
 ## Accessibility Notes
 - All output uses standard markdown that works with screen readers
 - No time pressure - take as long as you need between responses
 - Questions are designed to be answerable without deep context retrieval
 - Visual patterns (bold, bullets, tables) create scannable structure
 ## Feedback
 If you have suggestions for improving neurodivergent support in clarity-assist, please open an issue at:
 https://gitea.hotserv.cloud/personal-projects/leo-claude-mktplace/issues
 Include the label `clarity-assist` and describe:
 - What challenge you faced
 - What would have helped
 - Any specific accommodations you'd like to see
--- a/plugins/git-flow/README.md
+++ b/plugins/git-flow/README.md
@@ -119,6 +119,10 @@ The git-assistant agent helps resolve merge conflicts with analysis and recommen
 → Status: Clean, up-to-date
 ```
 ## Documentation
 - [Branching Strategy Guide](docs/BRANCHING-STRATEGY.md) - Detailed documentation of the `development -> staging -> main` promotion flow
 ## Integration
 For CLAUDE.md integration instructions, see `claude-md-integration.md`.
--- a/plugins/git-flow/docs/BRANCHING-STRATEGY.md
+++ b/plugins/git-flow/docs/BRANCHING-STRATEGY.md
@@ -0,0 +1,541 @@
 # Branching Strategy
 ## Overview
 This document defines the branching strategy used by git-flow to manage code changes across environments. The strategy ensures:
 - **Stability**: Production code is always release-ready
 - **Isolation**: Features are developed in isolation without affecting others
 - **Traceability**: Clear history of what changed and when
 - **Collaboration**: Multiple developers can work simultaneously without conflicts
 The strategy follows a hierarchical promotion model: feature branches merge into development, which promotes to staging for testing, and finally to main for production release.
 ## Branch Types
 ### Main Branches
 | Branch | Purpose | Stability | Direct Commits |
 |--------|---------|-----------|----------------|
 | `main` | Production releases | Highest | Never |
 | `staging` | Pre-production testing | High | Never |
 | `development` | Active development | Medium | Never |
 ### Feature Branches
 Feature branches are short-lived branches created from `development` for implementing specific changes.
 | Prefix | Purpose | Example |
 |--------|---------|---------|
 | `feat/` | New features | `feat/user-authentication` |
 | `fix/` | Bug fixes | `fix/login-timeout-error` |
 | `docs/` | Documentation only | `docs/api-reference` |
 | `refactor/` | Code restructuring | `refactor/auth-module` |
 | `test/` | Test additions/fixes | `test/auth-coverage` |
 | `chore/` | Maintenance tasks | `chore/update-dependencies` |
 ### Special Branches
 | Branch | Purpose | Created From | Merges Into |
 |--------|---------|--------------|-------------|
 | `hotfix/*` | Emergency production fixes | `main` | `main` AND `development` |
 | `release/*` | Release preparation | `development` | `staging` then `main` |
 ## Branch Hierarchy
 ```
                    PRODUCTION
                        │
                        ▼
    ┌───────────────[ main ]───────────────┐
    │           (stable releases)           │
    │                   ▲                   │
    │                   │ PR                │
    │                   │                   │
    │           ┌───────┴───────┐           │
    │           │   staging     │           │
    │           │  (testing)    │           │
    │           └───────▲───────┘           │
    │                   │ PR                │
    │                   │                   │
    │         ┌─────────┴─────────┐         │
    │         │   development    │          │
    │         │ (integration)    │          │
    │         └─────────▲─────────┘         │
    │              ╱    │    ╲              │
    │           PR╱     │PR   ╲PR           │
    │           ╱       │      ╲            │
    │    ┌─────┴──┐  ┌──┴───┐  ┌┴─────┐    │
    │    │ feat/* │  │ fix/*│  │docs/*│    │
    │    └────────┘  └──────┘  └──────┘    │
    │         FEATURE BRANCHES              │
    └───────────────────────────────────────┘
 ```
 ## Workflow
 ### Feature Development
 The standard workflow for implementing a new feature or fix:
 ```mermaid
 gitGraph
    commit id: "initial"
    branch development
    checkout development
    commit id: "dev-base"
    branch feat/new-feature
    checkout feat/new-feature
    commit id: "implement"
    commit id: "tests"
    commit id: "polish"
    checkout development
    merge feat/new-feature id: "PR merged"
    commit id: "other-work"
 ```
 **Steps:**
 1. **Create branch from development**
   ```bash
   git checkout development
   git pull origin development
   git checkout -b feat/add-user-auth
   ```
   Or use git-flow command:
   ```
   /branch-start add user authentication
   ```
 2. **Implement changes**
   - Make commits following conventional commit format
   - Keep commits atomic and focused
   - Push regularly to remote
 3. **Create Pull Request**
   - Target: `development`
   - Include description of changes
   - Link related issues
 4. **Review and merge**
   - Address review feedback
   - Squash or rebase as needed
   - Merge when approved
 5. **Cleanup**
   - Delete feature branch after merge
   ```
   /branch-cleanup
   ```
 ### Release Promotion
 Promoting code from development to production:
 ```mermaid
 gitGraph
    commit id: "v1.0.0" tag: "v1.0.0"
    branch development
    checkout development
    commit id: "feat-1"
    commit id: "feat-2"
    commit id: "fix-1"
    branch staging
    checkout staging
    commit id: "staging-test"
    checkout main
    merge staging id: "v1.1.0" tag: "v1.1.0"
    checkout development
    merge main id: "sync"
 ```
 **Steps:**
 1. **Prepare release**
   - Ensure development is stable
   - Update version numbers
   - Update CHANGELOG.md
 2. **Promote to staging**
   ```bash
   git checkout staging
   git merge development
   git push origin staging
   ```
 3. **Test in staging**
   - Run integration tests
   - Perform QA validation
   - Fix any issues (merge fixes to development first, then re-promote)
 4. **Promote to main**
   ```bash
   git checkout main
   git merge staging
   git tag -a v1.1.0 -m "Release v1.1.0"
   git push origin main --tags
   ```
 5. **Sync development**
   ```bash
   git checkout development
   git merge main
   git push origin development
   ```
 ### Hotfix Handling
 Emergency fixes for production issues:
 ```mermaid
 gitGraph
    commit id: "v1.0.0" tag: "v1.0.0"
    branch development
    checkout development
    commit id: "ongoing-work"
    checkout main
    branch hotfix/critical-bug
    checkout hotfix/critical-bug
    commit id: "fix"
    checkout main
    merge hotfix/critical-bug id: "v1.0.1" tag: "v1.0.1"
    checkout development
    merge main id: "sync-fix"
 ```
 **Steps:**
 1. **Create hotfix branch from main**
   ```bash
   git checkout main
   git pull origin main
   git checkout -b hotfix/critical-security-fix
   ```
 2. **Implement fix**
   - Minimal, focused changes only
   - Include tests for the fix
   - Follow conventional commit format
 3. **Merge to main**
   ```bash
   git checkout main
   git merge hotfix/critical-security-fix
   git tag -a v1.0.1 -m "Hotfix: critical security fix"
   git push origin main --tags
   ```
 4. **Merge to development** (critical step)
   ```bash
   git checkout development
   git merge main
   git push origin development
   ```
 5. **Delete hotfix branch**
   ```bash
   git branch -d hotfix/critical-security-fix
   git push origin --delete hotfix/critical-security-fix
   ```
 ## PR Requirements
 ### To development
 | Requirement | Description |
 |-------------|-------------|
 | Passing tests | All CI tests must pass |
 | Conventional commit | Message follows `type(scope): description` format |
 | No conflicts | Branch must be rebased on latest development |
 | Code review | At least one approval (recommended) |
 ### To staging
 | Requirement | Description |
 |-------------|-------------|
 | All checks pass | CI, linting, tests, security scans |
 | From development | Only PRs from development branch |
 | Clean history | Squashed or rebased commits |
 | Release notes | CHANGELOG updated with version |
 ### To main (Protected)
 | Requirement | Description |
 |-------------|-------------|
 | Source restriction | PRs only from `staging` or `development` |
 | All checks pass | Complete CI pipeline success |
 | Approvals | Minimum 1-2 reviewer approvals |
 | No direct push | Force push disabled |
 | Version tag | Must include version tag on merge |
 ## Branch Flow Diagram
 ### Complete Lifecycle
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
    subgraph Feature["Feature Development"]
        A[Create feature branch] --> B[Implement changes]
        B --> C[Push commits]
        C --> D[Create PR to development]
        D --> E{Review passed?}
        E -->|No| B
        E -->|Yes| F[Merge to development]
        F --> G[Delete feature branch]
    end
    subgraph Release["Release Cycle"]
        H[development stable] --> I[Create PR to staging]
        I --> J[Test in staging]
        J --> K{Tests passed?}
        K -->|No| L[Fix in development]
        L --> H
        K -->|Yes| M[Create PR to main]
        M --> N[Tag release]
        N --> O[Sync development]
    end
    subgraph Hotfix["Hotfix Process"]
        P[Critical bug in prod] --> Q[Create hotfix from main]
        Q --> R[Implement fix]
        R --> S[Merge to main + tag]
        S --> T[Merge to development]
    end
    G --> H
    O --> Feature
    T --> Feature
 ```
 ### Release Cycle Timeline
 ```mermaid
 gantt
    title Release Cycle
    dateFormat  YYYY-MM-DD
    section Feature Development
    Feature A           :a1, 2024-01-01, 5d
    Feature B           :a2, 2024-01-03, 4d
    Bug Fix             :a3, 2024-01-06, 2d
    section Integration
    Merge to development:b1, after a1, 1d
    Integration testing :b2, after b1, 2d
    section Release
    Promote to staging  :c1, after b2, 1d
    QA testing          :c2, after c1, 3d
    Release to main     :milestone, after c2, 0d
 ```
 ## Examples
 ### Example 1: Adding a New Feature
 **Scenario:** Add user password reset functionality
 ```bash
 # 1. Start from development
 git checkout development
 git pull origin development
 # 2. Create feature branch
 git checkout -b feat/password-reset
 # 3. Make changes and commit
 git add src/auth/password-reset.ts
 git commit -m "feat(auth): add password reset request handler"
 git add src/email/templates/reset-email.html
 git commit -m "feat(email): add password reset email template"
 git add tests/auth/password-reset.test.ts
 git commit -m "test(auth): add password reset tests"
 # 4. Push and create PR
 git push -u origin feat/password-reset
 # Create PR targeting development
 # 5. After merge, cleanup
 git checkout development
 git pull origin development
 git branch -d feat/password-reset
 ```
 ### Example 2: Bug Fix
 **Scenario:** Fix login timeout issue
 ```bash
 # 1. Create fix branch
 git checkout development
 git pull origin development
 git checkout -b fix/login-timeout
 # 2. Fix and commit
 git add src/auth/session.ts
 git commit -m "fix(auth): increase session timeout to 30 minutes
 The default 5-minute timeout was causing frequent re-authentication.
 Extended to 30 minutes based on user feedback.
 Closes #456"
 # 3. Push and create PR
 git push -u origin fix/login-timeout
 ```
 ### Example 3: Documentation Update
 **Scenario:** Update API documentation
 ```bash
 # 1. Create docs branch
 git checkout development
 git checkout -b docs/api-authentication
 # 2. Update docs
 git add docs/api/authentication.md
 git commit -m "docs(api): document authentication endpoints
 Add detailed documentation for:
 - POST /auth/login
 - POST /auth/logout
 - POST /auth/refresh
 - GET /auth/me"
 # 3. Push and create PR
 git push -u origin docs/api-authentication
 ```
 ### Example 4: Emergency Hotfix
 **Scenario:** Critical security vulnerability in production
 ```bash
 # 1. Create hotfix from main
 git checkout main
 git pull origin main
 git checkout -b hotfix/sql-injection
 # 2. Fix the issue
 git add src/db/queries.ts
 git commit -m "fix(security): sanitize SQL query parameters
 CRITICAL: Addresses SQL injection vulnerability in user search.
 All user inputs are now properly parameterized.
 CVE: CVE-2024-XXXXX"
 # 3. Merge to main with tag
 git checkout main
 git merge hotfix/sql-injection
 git tag -a v2.1.1 -m "Hotfix: SQL injection vulnerability"
 git push origin main --tags
 # 4. Sync to development (IMPORTANT!)
 git checkout development
 git merge main
 git push origin development
 # 5. Cleanup
 git branch -d hotfix/sql-injection
 ```
 ### Example 5: Release Promotion
 **Scenario:** Release version 2.2.0
 ```bash
 # 1. Ensure development is ready
 git checkout development
 git pull origin development
 # Run full test suite
 npm test
 # 2. Update version and changelog
 # Edit package.json, CHANGELOG.md
 git add package.json CHANGELOG.md
 git commit -m "chore(release): prepare v2.2.0"
 # 3. Promote to staging
 git checkout staging
 git merge development
 git push origin staging
 # 4. After QA approval, promote to main
 git checkout main
 git merge staging
 git tag -a v2.2.0 -m "Release v2.2.0"
 git push origin main --tags
 # 5. Sync development
 git checkout development
 git merge main
 git push origin development
 ```
 ## Configuration
 ### Environment Variables
 Configure the branching strategy via environment variables:
 ```bash
 # Default base branch for new features
 GIT_DEFAULT_BASE=development
 # Protected branches (comma-separated)
 GIT_PROTECTED_BRANCHES=main,master,development,staging,production
 # Workflow style
 GIT_WORKFLOW_STYLE=feature-branch
 # Auto-delete merged branches
 GIT_AUTO_DELETE_MERGED=true
 ```
 ### Per-Project Configuration
 Create `.git-flow.json` in project root:
 ```json
 {
  "defaultBase": "development",
  "protectedBranches": ["main", "staging", "development"],
  "branchPrefixes": ["feat", "fix", "docs", "refactor", "test", "chore"],
  "requirePR": {
    "main": true,
    "staging": true,
    "development": false
  },
  "squashOnMerge": {
    "development": true,
    "staging": false,
    "main": false
  }
 }
 ```
 ## Best Practices
 ### Do
 - Keep feature branches short-lived (< 1 week)
 - Rebase feature branches on development regularly
 - Write descriptive commit messages
 - Delete branches after merging
 - Tag all releases on main
 - Always sync development after hotfixes
 ### Avoid
 - Long-lived feature branches
 - Direct commits to protected branches
 - Force pushing to shared branches
 - Merging untested code to staging
 - Skipping the development sync after hotfixes
 ## Related Documentation
 - [Branching Strategies Skill](/plugins/git-flow/skills/workflow-patterns/branching-strategies.md)
 - [git-flow README](/plugins/git-flow/README.md)
 - [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/)
`@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@`
	`# Leo Claude Marketplace - v5.1.0`	`# Leo Claude Marketplace - v5.2.0`

	`A collection of Claude Code plugins for project management, infrastructure automation, and development workflows.`	`A collection of Claude Code plugins for project management, infrastructure automation, and development workflows.`