feat: Domain Advisory Pattern - viz-platform integration (Sprint 9) #370
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
|
||||
},
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"description": "Project management plugins with Gitea and NetBox integrations",
|
||||
"version": "5.5.0"
|
||||
"version": "5.6.0"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"plugins": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
17
CHANGELOG.md
17
CHANGELOG.md
@@ -4,6 +4,23 @@ All notable changes to the Leo Claude Marketplace will be documented in this fil
|
||||
|
||||
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/).
|
||||
|
||||
## [5.6.0] - 2026-02-01
|
||||
|
||||
### Added
|
||||
- **Domain Advisory Pattern**: Cross-plugin integration enabling projman to consult domain-specific plugins during sprint lifecycle
|
||||
- **projman**: New `domain-consultation.md` skill for domain detection and gate protocols
|
||||
- **viz-platform**: New `design-reviewer` agent for design system compliance auditing
|
||||
- **viz-platform**: New `design-system-audit.md` skill defining audit rules and severity levels
|
||||
- **viz-platform**: New `/design-review` command for detailed design system audits
|
||||
- **viz-platform**: New `/design-gate` command for binary pass/fail validation gates
|
||||
- **Labels**: New `Domain/Viz` and `Domain/Data` labels for domain routing
|
||||
|
||||
### Changed
|
||||
- **projman planner**: Now loads domain-consultation skill and performs domain detection during planning
|
||||
- **projman orchestrator**: Now runs domain gates before marking Domain/* labeled issues as complete
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## [5.5.0] - 2026-02-01
|
||||
|
||||
### Added
|
||||
|
||||
19
README.md
19
README.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Leo Claude Marketplace - v5.5.0
|
||||
# Leo Claude Marketplace - v5.6.0
|
||||
|
||||
A collection of Claude Code plugins for project management, infrastructure automation, and development workflows.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -138,7 +138,22 @@ Visualization toolkit with version-locked component validation and design token
|
||||
- 5 Page tools for multi-page app structure
|
||||
- Dual theme storage: user-level and project-level
|
||||
|
||||
**Commands:** `/chart`, `/chart-export`, `/dashboard`, `/theme`, `/theme-new`, `/theme-css`, `/component`, `/accessibility-check`, `/breakpoints`, `/initial-setup`
|
||||
**Commands:** `/chart`, `/chart-export`, `/dashboard`, `/theme`, `/theme-new`, `/theme-css`, `/component`, `/accessibility-check`, `/breakpoints`, `/design-review`, `/design-gate`, `/initial-setup`
|
||||
|
||||
## Domain Advisory Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
The marketplace supports cross-plugin domain advisory integration:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Domain Detection**: projman automatically detects when issues involve specialized domains (frontend/viz, data engineering)
|
||||
- **Acceptance Criteria**: Domain-specific acceptance criteria are added to issues during planning
|
||||
- **Execution Gates**: Domain validation gates (`/design-gate`, `/data-gate`) run before issue completion
|
||||
- **Extensible**: New domains can be added by creating advisory agents and gate commands
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Domains:**
|
||||
| Domain | Plugin | Gate Command |
|
||||
|--------|--------|--------------|
|
||||
| Visualization | viz-platform | `/design-gate` |
|
||||
| Data (planned) | data-platform | `/data-gate` |
|
||||
|
||||
## MCP Servers
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ You are the **Orchestrator Agent** - a concise, action-oriented coordinator who
|
||||
- skills/progress-tracking.md
|
||||
- skills/runaway-detection.md
|
||||
- skills/wiki-conventions.md
|
||||
- skills/domain-consultation.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Personality
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -73,6 +74,25 @@ Execute `skills/dependency-management.md` - Check for file conflicts before para
|
||||
### 6. Track Progress
|
||||
Execute `skills/progress-tracking.md` - Manage status labels, parse progress comments.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.5. Domain Gate Checks
|
||||
Execute `skills/domain-consultation.md` (Execution Gate Protocol section):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Before marking any issue as complete**, check for `Domain/*` labels
|
||||
2. **If `Domain/Viz` label present:**
|
||||
- Identify files changed by this issue
|
||||
- Invoke `/design-gate <path-to-changed-files>`
|
||||
- Gate PASS → proceed to mark issue complete
|
||||
- Gate FAIL → add comment to issue with failure details, keep issue open
|
||||
3. **If `Domain/Data` label present:**
|
||||
- Identify files changed by this issue
|
||||
- Invoke `/data-gate <path-to-changed-files>`
|
||||
- Gate PASS → proceed to mark issue complete
|
||||
- Gate FAIL → add comment to issue with failure details, keep issue open
|
||||
4. **If gate command unavailable** (MCP server not running):
|
||||
- Warn user: "Domain gate unavailable - proceeding without validation"
|
||||
- Proceed with completion (non-blocking degradation)
|
||||
- Do NOT silently skip
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Monitor for Runaway Agents
|
||||
Execute `skills/runaway-detection.md` - Intervene when agents are stuck.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -93,6 +113,7 @@ Execute `skills/git-workflow.md` - Merge, tag, clean up branches.
|
||||
4. **ALWAYS monitor dispatched agents** - Intervene if stuck
|
||||
5. **ALWAYS capture lessons** - Don't skip the interview at sprint close
|
||||
6. **ALWAYS update milestone** - Close milestone when sprint complete
|
||||
7. **ALWAYS run domain gates** - Issues with `Domain/*` labels must pass gates before completion
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Mission
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ You are the **Planner Agent** - a methodical architect who thoroughly analyzes r
|
||||
- skills/sprint-approval.md
|
||||
- skills/planning-workflow.md
|
||||
- skills/label-taxonomy/labels-reference.md
|
||||
- skills/domain-consultation.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Personality
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -66,10 +67,25 @@ Execute `skills/wiki-conventions.md` - Create proposal and implementation pages.
|
||||
### 6. Task Sizing
|
||||
Execute `skills/task-sizing.md` - **REFUSE to create L/XL tasks without breakdown.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Issue Creation
|
||||
### 7. Domain Consultation
|
||||
|
||||
Execute `skills/domain-consultation.md` (Planning Protocol section):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **After drafting issues but BEFORE creating them in Gitea**
|
||||
2. **Analyze each issue for domain signals:**
|
||||
- Check planned labels for `Component/Frontend`, `Component/UI` -> Domain/Viz
|
||||
- Check planned labels for `Component/Database`, `Component/Data` -> Domain/Data
|
||||
- Scan issue description for domain keywords (see skill for full list)
|
||||
3. **For detected domains, append acceptance criteria:**
|
||||
- Domain/Viz: Design System Compliance checklist
|
||||
- Domain/Data: Data Integrity checklist
|
||||
4. **Add corresponding `Domain/*` label** to the issue's label set
|
||||
5. **Document in planning summary** which issues have domain gates active
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Issue Creation
|
||||
Execute `skills/issue-conventions.md` - Use proper format with wiki references.
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Request Approval
|
||||
### 9. Request Approval
|
||||
Execute `skills/sprint-approval.md` - Planning DOES NOT equal execution permission.
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical Reminders
|
||||
@@ -81,6 +97,7 @@ Execute `skills/sprint-approval.md` - Planning DOES NOT equal execution permissi
|
||||
5. **ALWAYS search lessons** - Past experience informs better planning
|
||||
6. **ALWAYS include wiki reference** - Every issue links to implementation wiki page
|
||||
7. **ALWAYS use proper title format** - `[Sprint XX] <type>: <description>`
|
||||
8. **ALWAYS check domain signals** - Every issue gets checked for viz/data domain applicability before creation
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Mission
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
163
plugins/projman/skills/domain-consultation.md
Normal file
163
plugins/projman/skills/domain-consultation.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: domain-consultation
|
||||
description: Cross-plugin domain consultation for specialized planning and validation
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Domain Consultation
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Enables projman agents to detect domain-specific work and consult specialized plugins for expert validation during planning and execution phases. This skill is the backbone of the Domain Advisory Pattern.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
| Agent | Phase | Action |
|
||||
|-------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| Planner | After task sizing, before issue creation | Detect domains, add acceptance criteria |
|
||||
| Orchestrator | Before marking issue complete | Run domain gates, block if violations |
|
||||
| Code Reviewer | During review | Include domain compliance in findings |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Domain Detection Rules
|
||||
|
||||
| Signal Type | Detection Pattern | Domain Plugin | Action |
|
||||
|-------------|-------------------|---------------|--------|
|
||||
| Label-based | `Component/Frontend`, `Component/UI` | viz-platform | Add design system criteria, apply `Domain/Viz` |
|
||||
| Content-based | Keywords: DMC, Dash, layout, theme, component, dashboard, chart, responsive, color, UI, frontend, Plotly | viz-platform | Same as above |
|
||||
| Label-based | `Component/Database`, `Component/Data` | data-platform | Add data validation criteria, apply `Domain/Data` |
|
||||
| Content-based | Keywords: schema, migration, pipeline, dbt, table, column, query, PostgreSQL, lineage, data model | data-platform | Same as above |
|
||||
| Both signals | Frontend + Data signals present | Both plugins | Apply both sets of criteria |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Planning Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
When creating issues, the planner MUST:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Analyze each issue** for domain signals (check labels AND scan description for keywords)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **For Domain/Viz issues**, append this acceptance criteria block:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Design System Compliance
|
||||
- [ ] All DMC components validated against registry
|
||||
- [ ] Theme tokens used (no hardcoded colors/sizes)
|
||||
- [ ] Accessibility check passed (WCAG contrast)
|
||||
- [ ] Responsive breakpoints verified
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **For Domain/Data issues**, append this acceptance criteria block:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Data Integrity
|
||||
- [ ] Schema changes validated
|
||||
- [ ] dbt tests pass
|
||||
- [ ] Lineage intact (no orphaned models)
|
||||
- [ ] Data types verified
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Apply the corresponding `Domain/*` label** to route the issue through gates
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Document in planning summary** which issues have domain gates active
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution Gate Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
Before marking any issue as complete, the orchestrator MUST:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Check issue labels** for `Domain/*` labels
|
||||
|
||||
2. **If `Domain/Viz` label present:**
|
||||
- Identify files changed by this issue
|
||||
- Invoke `/design-gate <path-to-changed-files>`
|
||||
- Gate PASS → proceed to mark issue complete
|
||||
- Gate FAIL → add comment to issue with failure details, keep issue open
|
||||
|
||||
3. **If `Domain/Data` label present:**
|
||||
- Identify files changed by this issue
|
||||
- Invoke `/data-gate <path-to-changed-files>`
|
||||
- Gate PASS → proceed to mark issue complete
|
||||
- Gate FAIL → add comment to issue with failure details, keep issue open
|
||||
|
||||
4. **If gate command unavailable** (MCP server not running):
|
||||
- Warn user: "Domain gate unavailable - proceeding without validation"
|
||||
- Proceed with completion (non-blocking degradation)
|
||||
- Do NOT silently skip - always inform user
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
During code review, the code reviewer SHOULD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. After completing standard code quality and security checks, check for `Domain/*` labels
|
||||
|
||||
2. **If Domain/Viz:** Include "Design System Compliance" section in review report
|
||||
- Reference `/design-review` findings if available
|
||||
- Check for hardcoded colors, invalid props, accessibility issues
|
||||
|
||||
3. **If Domain/Data:** Include "Data Integrity" section in review report
|
||||
- Reference `/data-gate` findings if available
|
||||
- Check for schema validity, lineage integrity
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Extensibility
|
||||
|
||||
To add a new domain (e.g., `Domain/Infra` for cmdb-assistant):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **In domain plugin:** Create advisory agent + gate command
|
||||
- Agent: `agents/infra-advisor.md`
|
||||
- Gate command: `commands/infra-gate.md`
|
||||
- Audit skill: `skills/infra-audit.md`
|
||||
|
||||
2. **In this skill:** Add detection rules to the Detection Rules table above
|
||||
- Define label-based signals (e.g., `Component/Infrastructure`)
|
||||
- Define content-based keywords (e.g., "server", "network", "NetBox")
|
||||
|
||||
3. **In label taxonomy:** Add `Domain/Infra` label with appropriate color
|
||||
- Update `plugins/projman/skills/label-taxonomy/labels-reference.md`
|
||||
|
||||
4. **No changes needed** to planner.md or orchestrator.md agent files
|
||||
- They read this skill dynamically
|
||||
- Detection rules table is the single source of truth
|
||||
|
||||
This pattern ensures domain expertise stays in domain plugins while projman orchestrates when to ask.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Domain Acceptance Criteria Templates
|
||||
|
||||
### Design System Compliance (Domain/Viz)
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Design System Compliance
|
||||
- [ ] All DMC components validated against registry
|
||||
- [ ] Theme tokens used (no hardcoded colors/sizes)
|
||||
- [ ] Accessibility check passed (WCAG contrast)
|
||||
- [ ] Responsive breakpoints verified
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Integrity (Domain/Data)
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Data Integrity
|
||||
- [ ] Schema changes validated
|
||||
- [ ] dbt tests pass
|
||||
- [ ] Lineage intact (no orphaned models)
|
||||
- [ ] Data types verified
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Gate Command Reference
|
||||
|
||||
| Domain | Gate Command | Review Command | Advisory Agent |
|
||||
|--------|--------------|----------------|----------------|
|
||||
| Viz | `/design-gate <path>` | `/design-review <path>` | `design-reviewer` |
|
||||
| Data | `/data-gate <path>` | `/data-review <path>` | `data-advisor` |
|
||||
|
||||
Gate commands return binary PASS/FAIL for automation.
|
||||
Review commands return detailed reports for human review.
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ description: Dynamic reference for Gitea label taxonomy (organization + reposito
|
||||
|
||||
This skill provides the current label taxonomy used for issue classification in Gitea. Labels are **fetched dynamically** from Gitea and should never be hardcoded.
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Taxonomy:** 47 labels (31 organization + 16 repository)
|
||||
**Current Taxonomy:** 49 labels (31 organization + 18 repository)
|
||||
|
||||
## Organization Labels (31)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Organization-level labels are shared across all repositories in your configured
|
||||
- `Status/Failed` (#de350b) - Implementation attempted but failed, needs investigation
|
||||
- `Status/Deferred` (#6554c0) - Moved to a future sprint or backlog
|
||||
|
||||
## Repository Labels (16)
|
||||
## Repository Labels (18)
|
||||
|
||||
Repository-level labels are specific to each project.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,6 +90,27 @@ Repository-level labels are specific to each project.
|
||||
- `Tech/Vue` (#42b883) - Vue.js frontend framework
|
||||
- `Tech/FastAPI` (#009688) - FastAPI backend framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Domain (2 labels)
|
||||
|
||||
Cross-plugin integration labels for domain-specific validation gates.
|
||||
|
||||
| Label | Color | Description |
|
||||
|-------|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| `Domain/Viz` | `#7c4dff` | Issue involves visualization/frontend — triggers viz-platform design gates |
|
||||
| `Domain/Data` | `#00bfa5` | Issue involves data engineering — triggers data-platform data gates |
|
||||
|
||||
**Detection Rules:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Domain/Viz:**
|
||||
- Keywords: "dashboard", "chart", "theme", "DMC", "component", "layout", "responsive", "color", "UI", "frontend", "Dash", "Plotly"
|
||||
- Also applied when: `Component/Frontend` or `Component/UI` label is present
|
||||
- Example: "Create new neighbourhood comparison dashboard tab"
|
||||
|
||||
**Domain/Data:**
|
||||
- Keywords: "schema", "migration", "pipeline", "dbt", "table", "column", "query", "PostgreSQL", "lineage", "data model"
|
||||
- Also applied when: `Component/Database` or `Component/Data` label is present
|
||||
- Example: "Add census demographic data pipeline"
|
||||
|
||||
## Label Suggestion Logic
|
||||
|
||||
When suggesting labels for issues, consider the following patterns:
|
||||
|
||||
288
plugins/viz-platform/agents/design-reviewer.md
Normal file
288
plugins/viz-platform/agents/design-reviewer.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,288 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
agent: design-reviewer
|
||||
description: Reviews code for design system compliance using viz-platform MCP tools
|
||||
triggers:
|
||||
- /design-review command
|
||||
- /design-gate command
|
||||
- projman orchestrator domain gate
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Design Reviewer Agent
|
||||
|
||||
You are a strict design system compliance auditor. Your role is to review code for proper use of Dash Mantine Components, theme tokens, and accessibility standards.
|
||||
|
||||
## Visual Output Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**MANDATORY: Display header at start of every response.**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| VIZ-PLATFORM - Design Reviewer |
|
||||
| [Target Path] |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Trigger Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
Activate this agent when:
|
||||
- User runs `/design-review <path>`
|
||||
- User runs `/design-gate <path>`
|
||||
- Projman orchestrator requests design domain gate check
|
||||
- Code review includes DMC/Dash components
|
||||
|
||||
## Skills to Load
|
||||
|
||||
- skills/design-system-audit.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Available MCP Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Purpose |
|
||||
|------|---------|
|
||||
| `validate_component` | Check DMC component configurations for invalid props |
|
||||
| `get_component_props` | Retrieve expected props for a component |
|
||||
| `list_components` | Cross-reference components against DMC registry |
|
||||
| `theme_validate` | Validate theme configuration |
|
||||
| `accessibility_validate_colors` | Verify color contrast meets WCAG standards |
|
||||
| `accessibility_validate_theme` | Full theme accessibility audit |
|
||||
|
||||
## Operating Modes
|
||||
|
||||
### Review Mode (default)
|
||||
|
||||
Triggered by `/design-review <path>`
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics:**
|
||||
- Produces detailed report with all findings
|
||||
- Groups findings by severity (FAIL/WARN/INFO)
|
||||
- Includes actionable recommendations with code fixes
|
||||
- Does NOT block - informational only
|
||||
- Shows theme compliance percentage
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate Mode
|
||||
|
||||
Triggered by `/design-gate <path>` or projman orchestrator domain gate
|
||||
|
||||
**Characteristics:**
|
||||
- Binary PASS/FAIL output
|
||||
- Only reports FAIL-level issues
|
||||
- Returns exit status for automation integration
|
||||
- Blocks completion on FAIL
|
||||
- Compact output for CI/CD pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
## Audit Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Receive Target Path
|
||||
Accept file or directory path from command invocation.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Scan for DMC Usage
|
||||
Find relevant files:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Look for files with DMC imports
|
||||
import dash_mantine_components as dmc
|
||||
|
||||
# Look for component instantiations
|
||||
dmc.Button(...)
|
||||
dmc.Card(...)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Component Validation
|
||||
For each DMC component found:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Extract component name and props from code
|
||||
2. Call `list_components` to verify component exists in registry
|
||||
3. Call `get_component_props` to get valid prop schema
|
||||
4. Compare used props against schema
|
||||
5. **FAIL**: Invalid props, unknown components
|
||||
6. **WARN**: Deprecated patterns, React-style props
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Theme Compliance Check
|
||||
Detect hardcoded values that should use theme tokens:
|
||||
|
||||
| Pattern | Issue | Recommendation |
|
||||
|---------|-------|----------------|
|
||||
| `color="#228be6"` | Hardcoded color | Use `color="blue"` or theme token |
|
||||
| `color="rgb(34, 139, 230)"` | Hardcoded RGB | Use theme color reference |
|
||||
| `style={"padding": "16px"}` | Hardcoded size | Use `p="md"` prop |
|
||||
| `style={"fontSize": "14px"}` | Hardcoded font | Use `size="sm"` prop |
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Accessibility Validation
|
||||
Check accessibility compliance:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Call `accessibility_validate_colors` on detected color pairs
|
||||
2. Check color contrast ratios (min 4.5:1 for AA)
|
||||
3. Verify interactive components have accessible labels
|
||||
4. Flag missing aria-labels on buttons/links
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Report
|
||||
Output format depends on operating mode.
|
||||
|
||||
## Report Formats
|
||||
|
||||
### Gate Mode Output
|
||||
|
||||
**PASS:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
DESIGN GATE: PASS
|
||||
No blocking design system violations found.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**FAIL:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
DESIGN GATE: FAIL
|
||||
|
||||
Blocking Issues (2):
|
||||
1. app/pages/home.py:45 - Invalid prop 'onclick' on dmc.Button
|
||||
Fix: Use 'n_clicks' for click handling
|
||||
|
||||
2. app/components/nav.py:12 - Component 'dmc.Navbar' not found
|
||||
Fix: Use 'dmc.AppShell.Navbar' (DMC v0.14+)
|
||||
|
||||
Run /design-review for full audit report.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Review Mode Output
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
| VIZ-PLATFORM - Design Review Report |
|
||||
| /path/to/project |
|
||||
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
||||
|
||||
Files Scanned: 8
|
||||
Components Analyzed: 34
|
||||
Theme Compliance: 78%
|
||||
|
||||
## FAIL - Must Fix (2)
|
||||
|
||||
### app/pages/home.py:45
|
||||
**Invalid prop on dmc.Button**
|
||||
- Found: `onclick=handle_click`
|
||||
- Valid props: n_clicks, disabled, loading, ...
|
||||
- Fix: `n_clicks` triggers callback, not `onclick`
|
||||
|
||||
### app/components/nav.py:12
|
||||
**Component not in registry**
|
||||
- Found: `dmc.Navbar`
|
||||
- Status: Removed in DMC v0.14
|
||||
- Fix: Use `dmc.AppShell.Navbar` instead
|
||||
|
||||
## WARN - Should Fix (3)
|
||||
|
||||
### app/pages/home.py:23
|
||||
**Hardcoded color**
|
||||
- Found: `color="#228be6"`
|
||||
- Recommendation: Use `theme.colors.blue[6]` or `color="blue"`
|
||||
|
||||
### app/components/card.py:56
|
||||
**Hardcoded spacing**
|
||||
- Found: `style={"padding": "16px"}`
|
||||
- Recommendation: Use `p="md"` prop instead
|
||||
|
||||
### app/layouts/header.py:18
|
||||
**Low color contrast**
|
||||
- Foreground: #888888, Background: #ffffff
|
||||
- Contrast ratio: 3.5:1 (below AA standard of 4.5:1)
|
||||
- Recommendation: Darken text to #757575 for 4.6:1 ratio
|
||||
|
||||
## INFO - Suggestions (2)
|
||||
|
||||
### app/components/card.py:8
|
||||
**Consider more specific component**
|
||||
- Found: `dmc.Box` used as card container
|
||||
- Suggestion: `dmc.Paper` provides card semantics and shadow
|
||||
|
||||
### app/pages/dashboard.py:92
|
||||
**Missing aria-label**
|
||||
- Found: `dmc.ActionIcon` without accessible label
|
||||
- Suggestion: Add `aria-label="Close"` for screen readers
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Severity | Count | Action |
|
||||
|----------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| FAIL | 2 | Must fix before merge |
|
||||
| WARN | 3 | Address in this PR or follow-up |
|
||||
| INFO | 2 | Optional improvements |
|
||||
|
||||
Gate Status: FAIL (2 blocking issues)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Severity Definitions
|
||||
|
||||
| Level | Criteria | Action Required |
|
||||
|-------|----------|-----------------|
|
||||
| **FAIL** | Invalid props, unknown components, breaking changes | Must fix before merge |
|
||||
| **WARN** | Hardcoded values, deprecated patterns, contrast issues | Should fix |
|
||||
| **INFO** | Suboptimal patterns, missing optional attributes | Consider for improvement |
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Violations
|
||||
|
||||
### FAIL-Level Issues
|
||||
|
||||
| Issue | Pattern | Fix |
|
||||
|-------|---------|-----|
|
||||
| Invalid prop | `onclick=handler` | Use `n_clicks` + callback |
|
||||
| Unknown component | `dmc.Navbar` | Use `dmc.AppShell.Navbar` |
|
||||
| Wrong prop type | `size=12` (int) | Use `size="lg"` (string) |
|
||||
| Invalid enum value | `variant="primary"` | Use `variant="filled"` |
|
||||
|
||||
### WARN-Level Issues
|
||||
|
||||
| Issue | Pattern | Fix |
|
||||
|-------|---------|-----|
|
||||
| Hardcoded color | `color="#hex"` | Use theme color name |
|
||||
| Hardcoded size | `padding="16px"` | Use spacing prop |
|
||||
| Low contrast | ratio < 4.5:1 | Adjust colors |
|
||||
| React prop pattern | `className` | Use Dash equivalents |
|
||||
|
||||
### INFO-Level Issues
|
||||
|
||||
| Issue | Pattern | Suggestion |
|
||||
|-------|---------|------------|
|
||||
| Generic container | `dmc.Box` for cards | Use `dmc.Paper` |
|
||||
| Missing aria-label | Interactive without label | Add accessible name |
|
||||
| Inline styles | `style={}` overuse | Use component props |
|
||||
|
||||
## Error Handling
|
||||
|
||||
| Error | Response |
|
||||
|-------|----------|
|
||||
| MCP server unavailable | Report error, suggest checking viz-platform MCP setup |
|
||||
| No DMC files found | "No Dash Mantine Components detected in target path" |
|
||||
| Invalid path | "Path not found: {path}" |
|
||||
| Empty directory | "No Python files found in {path}" |
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Projman
|
||||
|
||||
When called as a domain gate by projman orchestrator:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Receive path from orchestrator
|
||||
2. Run audit in gate mode
|
||||
3. Return structured result:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"gate": "design",
|
||||
"status": "PASS|FAIL",
|
||||
"blocking_count": 0,
|
||||
"summary": "No violations found"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
4. Orchestrator decides whether to proceed based on gate status
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Interactions
|
||||
|
||||
**User**: `/design-review src/pages/`
|
||||
**Agent**:
|
||||
1. Scans all .py files in src/pages/
|
||||
2. Identifies DMC component usage
|
||||
3. Validates each component with MCP tools
|
||||
4. Checks theme token usage
|
||||
5. Runs accessibility validation
|
||||
6. Returns full review report
|
||||
|
||||
**User**: `/design-gate src/`
|
||||
**Agent**:
|
||||
1. Scans all .py files
|
||||
2. Identifies FAIL-level issues only
|
||||
3. Returns PASS if clean, FAIL with blocking issues if not
|
||||
4. Compact output for pipeline integration
|
||||
93
plugins/viz-platform/commands/design-gate.md
Normal file
93
plugins/viz-platform/commands/design-gate.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Design system compliance gate (pass/fail) for sprint execution
|
||||
arguments:
|
||||
- name: path
|
||||
description: File or directory to validate
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /design-gate
|
||||
|
||||
Binary pass/fail validation for design system compliance. Used by projman orchestrator during sprint execution to gate issue completion.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/design-gate <path>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/design-gate ./app/pages/dashboard.py
|
||||
/design-gate ./app/components/
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## What It Does
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Activates** the `design-reviewer` agent in gate mode
|
||||
2. **Loads** the `skills/design-system-audit.md` skill
|
||||
3. **Scans** target path for DMC usage
|
||||
4. **Checks only for FAIL-level violations:**
|
||||
- Invalid component props
|
||||
- Non-existent components
|
||||
- Missing required props
|
||||
- Deprecated components
|
||||
5. **Returns binary result:**
|
||||
- `PASS` - No blocking violations found
|
||||
- `FAIL` - One or more blocking violations
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
### On PASS
|
||||
```
|
||||
DESIGN GATE: PASS
|
||||
No blocking design system violations found.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### On FAIL
|
||||
```
|
||||
DESIGN GATE: FAIL
|
||||
|
||||
Blocking Issues (2):
|
||||
1. app/pages/home.py:45 - Invalid prop 'onclick' on dmc.Button
|
||||
Fix: Use 'n_clicks' for click handling
|
||||
|
||||
2. app/components/nav.py:12 - Component 'dmc.Navbar' not found
|
||||
Fix: Use 'dmc.AppShell.Navbar' (DMC v0.14+)
|
||||
|
||||
Run /design-review for full audit report.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with projman
|
||||
|
||||
This command is automatically invoked by the projman orchestrator when:
|
||||
|
||||
1. An issue has the `Domain/Viz` label
|
||||
2. The orchestrator is about to mark the issue as complete
|
||||
3. The orchestrator passes the path of changed files
|
||||
|
||||
**Gate behavior:**
|
||||
- PASS → Issue can be marked complete
|
||||
- FAIL → Issue stays open, blocker comment added
|
||||
|
||||
## Differences from /design-review
|
||||
|
||||
| Aspect | /design-gate | /design-review |
|
||||
|--------|--------------|----------------|
|
||||
| Output | Binary PASS/FAIL | Detailed report |
|
||||
| Severity | FAIL only | FAIL + WARN + INFO |
|
||||
| Purpose | Automation gate | Human review |
|
||||
| Verbosity | Minimal | Comprehensive |
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- **Automated pipelines**: CI/CD design system checks
|
||||
- **Sprint execution**: Automatic quality gates
|
||||
- **Quick validation**: Fast pass/fail without full report
|
||||
|
||||
For detailed findings, use `/design-review` instead.
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- viz-platform MCP server must be running
|
||||
- Target path must exist
|
||||
70
plugins/viz-platform/commands/design-review.md
Normal file
70
plugins/viz-platform/commands/design-review.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Audit codebase for design system compliance
|
||||
arguments:
|
||||
- name: path
|
||||
description: File or directory to audit
|
||||
required: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# /design-review
|
||||
|
||||
Scans target path for Dash Mantine Components usage and validates against design system standards.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/design-review <path>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
/design-review ./app/pages/
|
||||
/design-review ./app/components/dashboard.py
|
||||
/design-review .
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## What It Does
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Activates** the `design-reviewer` agent in review mode
|
||||
2. **Loads** the `skills/design-system-audit.md` skill
|
||||
3. **Scans** target path for:
|
||||
- Python files with DMC imports
|
||||
- Component instantiations and their props
|
||||
- Style dictionaries and color values
|
||||
- Accessibility attributes
|
||||
4. **Validates** against:
|
||||
- DMC component registry (valid components and props)
|
||||
- Theme token usage (no hardcoded colors/sizes)
|
||||
- Accessibility standards (contrast, ARIA labels)
|
||||
5. **Produces** detailed report grouped by severity
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Generates a comprehensive audit report with:
|
||||
|
||||
- **FAIL**: Invalid props, deprecated components, missing required props
|
||||
- **WARN**: Hardcoded colors/sizes, missing accessibility attributes
|
||||
- **INFO**: Optimization suggestions, consistency recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
Each finding includes:
|
||||
- File path and line number
|
||||
- Description of the issue
|
||||
- Recommended fix
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- **Before PR review**: Catch design system violations early
|
||||
- **On existing codebases**: Audit for compliance gaps
|
||||
- **During refactoring**: Ensure changes maintain compliance
|
||||
- **Learning**: Understand design system best practices
|
||||
|
||||
## Related Commands
|
||||
|
||||
- `/design-gate` - Binary pass/fail for sprint execution (no detailed report)
|
||||
- `/component` - Inspect individual DMC component props
|
||||
- `/theme` - Check active theme configuration
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- viz-platform MCP server must be running
|
||||
- Target path must contain Python files with DMC usage
|
||||
280
plugins/viz-platform/skills/design-system-audit.md
Normal file
280
plugins/viz-platform/skills/design-system-audit.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: design-system-audit
|
||||
description: Design system compliance rules and violation patterns for viz-platform audits
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Design System Audit
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Defines what to check, how to classify violations, and common patterns for design system compliance auditing of Dash Mantine Components (DMC) code.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What to Check
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Component Prop Validity
|
||||
|
||||
| Check | Tool | Severity |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|
|
||||
| Invalid prop names (typos) | `validate_component` | FAIL |
|
||||
| Invalid prop values | `validate_component` | FAIL |
|
||||
| Missing required props | `validate_component` | FAIL |
|
||||
| Deprecated props | `get_component_props` | WARN |
|
||||
| Unknown props | `validate_component` | WARN |
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Theme Token Usage
|
||||
|
||||
| Check | Detection | Severity |
|
||||
|-------|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| Hardcoded hex colors | Regex `#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,6}` | WARN |
|
||||
| Hardcoded RGB/RGBA | Regex `rgb\(` | WARN |
|
||||
| Hardcoded font sizes | Regex `fontSize=\d+` | WARN |
|
||||
| Hardcoded spacing | Regex `margin=\d+|padding=\d+` | INFO |
|
||||
| Missing theme provider | AST analysis | FAIL |
|
||||
|
||||
**Allowed exceptions:**
|
||||
- Colors in theme definition files
|
||||
- Test/fixture files
|
||||
- Comments and documentation
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Accessibility Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
| Check | Tool | Severity |
|
||||
|-------|------|----------|
|
||||
| Color contrast ratio < 4.5:1 (AA) | `accessibility_validate_colors` | WARN |
|
||||
| Color contrast ratio < 3:1 (large text) | `accessibility_validate_colors` | WARN |
|
||||
| Missing aria-label on interactive | Manual scan | WARN |
|
||||
| Color-only information | `accessibility_validate_theme` | WARN |
|
||||
| Focus indicator missing | Manual scan | INFO |
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Responsive Design
|
||||
|
||||
| Check | Detection | Severity |
|
||||
|-------|-----------|----------|
|
||||
| Fixed pixel widths > 600px | Regex `width=\d{3,}` | INFO |
|
||||
| Missing breakpoint handling | No `visibleFrom`/`hiddenFrom` | INFO |
|
||||
| Non-responsive layout | Fixed Grid columns | INFO |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Violations
|
||||
|
||||
### FAIL-Level Violations
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Invalid prop name (typo)
|
||||
dmc.Button(colour="blue") # Should be 'color'
|
||||
|
||||
# Invalid enum value
|
||||
dmc.Button(size="large") # Should be 'lg'
|
||||
|
||||
# Missing required prop
|
||||
dmc.Select(data=[...]) # Missing 'id' for callbacks
|
||||
|
||||
# Invalid component name
|
||||
dmc.Buttons(...) # Should be 'Button'
|
||||
|
||||
# Wrong case
|
||||
dmc.Button(fullwidth=True) # Should be 'fullWidth'
|
||||
|
||||
# React patterns in Dash
|
||||
dmc.Button(onClick=fn) # Should use 'id' + callback
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### WARN-Level Violations
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Hardcoded colors
|
||||
dmc.Text(color="#ff0000") # Use theme token
|
||||
dmc.Button(style={"color": "red"}) # Use theme token
|
||||
|
||||
# Hardcoded font size
|
||||
dmc.Text(style={"fontSize": "14px"}) # Use 'size' prop
|
||||
|
||||
# Poor contrast
|
||||
dmc.Text(color="gray") # Check contrast ratio
|
||||
|
||||
# Inline styles for colors
|
||||
dmc.Container(style={"backgroundColor": "#f0f0f0"})
|
||||
|
||||
# Deprecated patterns
|
||||
dmc.Button(variant="subtle") # Check if still supported
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### INFO-Level Violations
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Fixed widths
|
||||
dmc.Container(w=800) # Consider responsive
|
||||
|
||||
# Missing responsive handling
|
||||
dmc.Grid.Col(span=6) # Consider span={{ base: 12, md: 6 }}
|
||||
|
||||
# Optimization opportunity
|
||||
dmc.Stack([dmc.Text(...) for _ in range(100)]) # Consider virtualization
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Severity Classification
|
||||
|
||||
| Level | Icon | Meaning | Action |
|
||||
|-------|------|---------|--------|
|
||||
| **FAIL** | Red circle | Blocking issue, will cause runtime error | Must fix before completion |
|
||||
| **WARN** | Orange circle | Quality issue, violates best practices | Should fix, may be waived |
|
||||
| **INFO** | Yellow circle | Suggestion for improvement | Consider for future |
|
||||
|
||||
### Severity Decision Tree
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Is it invalid syntax/props?
|
||||
YES -> FAIL
|
||||
NO -> Does it violate accessibility standards?
|
||||
YES -> WARN
|
||||
NO -> Does it use hardcoded styles?
|
||||
YES -> WARN
|
||||
NO -> Is it a best practice suggestion?
|
||||
YES -> INFO
|
||||
NO -> Not a violation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Scanning Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### File Types to Scan
|
||||
|
||||
| Extension | Priority | Check For |
|
||||
|-----------|----------|-----------|
|
||||
| `*.py` | High | DMC component usage |
|
||||
| `*.dash.py` | High | Layout definitions |
|
||||
| `theme*.py` | High | Theme configuration |
|
||||
| `layout*.py` | High | Layout structure |
|
||||
| `components/*.py` | High | Custom components |
|
||||
| `callbacks/*.py` | Medium | Component references |
|
||||
|
||||
### Scan Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Find relevant files**
|
||||
```
|
||||
glob: **/*.py
|
||||
filter: Contains 'dmc.' or 'dash_mantine_components'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Extract component usages**
|
||||
- Parse Python AST
|
||||
- Find all `dmc.*` calls
|
||||
- Extract component name and kwargs
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Validate each component**
|
||||
- Call `validate_component(name, props)`
|
||||
- Record violations with file:line reference
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Scan for patterns**
|
||||
- Hardcoded colors (regex)
|
||||
- Inline styles (AST)
|
||||
- Fixed dimensions (regex)
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Run accessibility checks**
|
||||
- Extract color combinations
|
||||
- Call `accessibility_validate_colors`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Report Template
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Design System Audit Report
|
||||
==========================
|
||||
Path: <scanned-path>
|
||||
Files Scanned: N
|
||||
Timestamp: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS
|
||||
|
||||
Summary
|
||||
-------
|
||||
FAIL: N blocking violations
|
||||
WARN: N quality warnings
|
||||
INFO: N suggestions
|
||||
|
||||
Findings
|
||||
--------
|
||||
|
||||
FAIL Violations (must fix)
|
||||
--------------------------
|
||||
[file.py:42] Invalid prop 'colour' on Button
|
||||
Found: colour="blue"
|
||||
Expected: color="blue"
|
||||
Docs: https://mantine.dev/core/button
|
||||
|
||||
[file.py:58] Invalid size value on Text
|
||||
Found: size="huge"
|
||||
Expected: One of ['xs', 'sm', 'md', 'lg', 'xl']
|
||||
|
||||
WARN Violations (should fix)
|
||||
----------------------------
|
||||
[theme.py:15] Hardcoded color detected
|
||||
Found: color="#ff0000"
|
||||
Suggestion: Use theme color token (e.g., color="red")
|
||||
|
||||
[layout.py:23] Low contrast ratio (3.2:1)
|
||||
Found: Text on background
|
||||
Required: 4.5:1 for WCAG AA
|
||||
Suggestion: Darken text or lighten background
|
||||
|
||||
INFO Suggestions
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
[dashboard.py:100] Consider responsive breakpoints
|
||||
Found: span=6 (fixed)
|
||||
Suggestion: span={{ base: 12, md: 6 }}
|
||||
|
||||
Files Scanned
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
- src/components/button.py (3 components)
|
||||
- src/layouts/main.py (8 components)
|
||||
- src/theme.py (1 theme config)
|
||||
|
||||
Gate Result: PASS | FAIL
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with MCP Tools
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Purpose | When Used |
|
||||
|------|---------|-----------|
|
||||
| `validate_component` | Check component props | Every component found |
|
||||
| `get_component_props` | Get expected props | When suggesting fixes |
|
||||
| `list_components` | Verify component exists | Unknown component names |
|
||||
| `theme_validate` | Validate theme config | Theme files |
|
||||
| `accessibility_validate_colors` | Check contrast | Color combinations |
|
||||
| `accessibility_validate_theme` | Full a11y audit | Theme files |
|
||||
|
||||
### Tool Call Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
For each Python file:
|
||||
For each dmc.Component(...) found:
|
||||
result = validate_component(
|
||||
component_name="Component",
|
||||
props={extracted_props}
|
||||
)
|
||||
if result.errors:
|
||||
record FAIL violation
|
||||
if result.warnings:
|
||||
record WARN violation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Skip Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Do not flag violations in:
|
||||
|
||||
- `**/tests/**` - Test files may have intentional violations
|
||||
- `**/__pycache__/**` - Compiled files
|
||||
- `**/fixtures/**` - Test fixtures
|
||||
- Files with `# noqa: design-audit` comment
|
||||
- Theme definition files (colors are expected there)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user