Phase 1b: Rename all ~94 commands across 12 plugins to /<noun> <action> sub-command pattern. Git-flow consolidated from 8→5 commands (commit variants absorbed into --push/--merge/--sync flags). Dispatch files, name: frontmatter, and cross-reference updates for all plugins. Phase 2: Design documents for 8 new plugins in docs/designs/. Phase 3: Scaffold 8 new plugins — saas-api-platform, saas-db-migrate, saas-react-platform, saas-test-pilot, data-seed, ops-release-manager, ops-deploy-pipeline, debug-mcp. Each with plugin.json, commands, agents, skills, README, and claude-md-integration. Marketplace grows from 12→20. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.6 KiB
2.6 KiB
description
| description |
|---|
| Mocking, stubbing, and dependency injection strategies for tests |
Mock Patterns Skill
Overview
Mocking strategies and best practices for isolating code under test from external dependencies.
When to Mock
| Situation | Mock? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| External API calls | Yes | Unreliable, slow, costs money |
| Database queries | Depends | Mock for unit, real for integration |
| File system | Depends | Mock for unit, tmpdir for integration |
| Time/date functions | Yes | Deterministic tests |
| Random/UUID generation | Yes | Reproducible tests |
| Pure utility functions | No | Fast, deterministic, no side effects |
| Internal business logic | No | Test the real thing |
Python Mocking
unittest.mock / pytest-mock
patch("module.path.to.dependency") # Replaces at import location
patch.object(MyClass, "method") # Replaces on specific class
MagicMock(return_value=expected) # Creates callable mock
MagicMock(side_effect=Exception("e")) # Raises on call
Critical rule: Patch where the dependency is USED, not where it is DEFINED.
- If
views.pyimportsfrom services import send_email, patchviews.send_email, NOTservices.send_email.
pytest-mock (preferred)
Use the mocker fixture for cleaner syntax:
mocker.patch("module.function")— auto-cleanup after testmocker.spy(obj, "method")— record calls without replacing
JavaScript Mocking
Jest
jest.mock("./module") // Auto-mock entire module
jest.spyOn(object, "method") // Spy without replacing
jest.fn().mockReturnValue(value) // Create mock function
Vitest
vi.mock("./module") // Same API as Jest
vi.spyOn(object, "method")
vi.fn().mockReturnValue(value)
Mock vs Stub vs Spy
| Type | Behavior | Use When |
|---|---|---|
| Mock | Replace entirely, return fake data | Isolating from external service |
| Stub | Provide canned responses | Controlling specific return values |
| Spy | Record calls, keep real behavior | Verifying interactions without changing behavior |
Dependency Injection Patterns
Prefer DI over mocking when possible:
- Constructor injection: pass dependencies as constructor args
- Function parameters: accept collaborators as arguments with defaults
- Context managers: swap implementations via context
DI makes tests simpler and avoids brittle mock paths.
Anti-Patterns
- Mocking too deep (mock chains:
mock.return_value.method.return_value) - Asserting on mock call counts instead of outcomes
- Mocking the system under test
- Not resetting mocks between tests (use autouse fixtures or afterEach)