Files
leo-claude-mktplace/plugins/pr-review/commands/pr-review.md
lmiranda b5d36865ee feat(plugins): add Visual Output headers to all other plugin commands
Add single-line visual headers to 66 command files across 10 plugins:
- clarity-assist (2 commands): 💬
- claude-config-maintainer (5 commands): ⚙️
- cmdb-assistant (11 commands): 🖥️
- code-sentinel (3 commands): 🔒
- contract-validator (5 commands): 
- data-platform (10 commands): 📊
- doc-guardian (5 commands): 📝
- git-flow (8 commands): 🔀
- pr-review (7 commands): 🔍
- viz-platform (10 commands): 🎨

Each command now displays a consistent header at execution start:
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  [icon] PLUGIN-NAME · Command Description                       │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Addresses #275 (other plugin commands visual output)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-28 17:24:49 -05:00

5.0 KiB

/pr-review - Full Multi-Agent Review

Visual Output

When executing this command, display the plugin header:

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  🔍 PR-REVIEW · Full Review                                       │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Then proceed with the review.

Purpose

Conduct a comprehensive pull request review using specialized agents for security, performance, maintainability, and test coverage.

Usage

/pr-review <pr-number> [--repo owner/repo]

Behavior

Step 1: Fetch PR Data

Using Gitea MCP tools:

  1. get_pull_request - PR metadata
  2. get_pr_diff - Code changes
  3. get_pr_comments - Existing discussion

Step 2: Dispatch to Agents

The coordinator dispatches review tasks to specialized agents:

PR Review: #123 - Add user authentication
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

Dispatching to review agents:
├─ Security Reviewer     → analyzing...
├─ Performance Analyst   → analyzing...
├─ Maintainability Auditor → analyzing...
└─ Test Validator        → analyzing...

Step 3: Aggregate Findings

Collect findings from all agents, each with:

  • Category (security, performance, maintainability, tests)
  • Severity (critical, major, minor, suggestion)
  • Confidence score (0.0 - 1.0)
  • File and line reference
  • Description
  • Suggested fix (if applicable)

Step 4: Filter by Confidence

Filter findings based on PR_REVIEW_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD (default: 0.7):

Confidence Label Description
0.9 - 1.0 HIGH Definite issue, must address
0.7 - 0.89 MEDIUM Likely issue, should address
0.5 - 0.69 LOW Possible concern, consider addressing
< threshold (filtered) Below configured threshold

Note: With the default threshold of 0.7, only MEDIUM and HIGH confidence findings are shown. Adjust PR_REVIEW_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD to include more or fewer findings.

Step 5: Generate Report

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
PR Review Report: #123
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════

Summary:
  Files changed: 12
  Lines added: 234
  Lines removed: 45

Findings: 8 total
  🔴 Critical: 1
  🟠 Major: 2
  🟡 Minor: 3
  💡 Suggestions: 2

───────────────────────────────────────────────────
CRITICAL FINDINGS
───────────────────────────────────────────────────

[SEC-001] SQL Injection Vulnerability (Confidence: 0.95)
File: src/api/users.ts:45
Category: Security

The query uses string interpolation without parameterization:
```ts
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;

Suggested fix:

const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?';
db.query(query, [userId]);

─────────────────────────────────────────────────── MAJOR FINDINGS ───────────────────────────────────────────────────

[PERF-001] N+1 Query Pattern (Confidence: 0.82) ...

─────────────────────────────────────────────────── VERDICT ───────────────────────────────────────────────────

REQUEST_CHANGES

This PR has 1 critical security issue that must be addressed before merging. See SEC-001 above.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────


### Step 6: Submit Review (Optional)

Submit this review to Gitea?

  1. Yes, with REQUEST_CHANGES
  2. Yes, as COMMENT only
  3. No, just show me the report

If yes, use `create_pr_review` MCP tool.

## Output

Full review report with:
- Summary statistics
- Findings grouped by severity
- Code snippets with context
- Suggested fixes
- Overall verdict

## Configuration

| Variable | Default | Description |
|----------|---------|-------------|
| `PR_REVIEW_CONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD` | `0.7` | Minimum confidence to report (0.0-1.0) |
| `PR_REVIEW_AUTO_SUBMIT` | `false` | Auto-submit to Gitea |