Add "lessons/sprints/sprint-6---visual-branding-and-documentation-maintenance"
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Sprint 6 - Visual Branding and Documentation Maintenance
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Metadata
|
||||||
|
- **Sprint:** Sprint 6 - Visual Branding Overhaul
|
||||||
|
- **Issues:** #272, #273, #274, #275, #276, #277, #278
|
||||||
|
- **PRs:** #284, #285
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Context
|
||||||
|
Implementing consistent visual headers across all 12 plugins with 109 files modified. Also discovered significant documentation drift during the process.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Learnings
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 1. Background Agent Permission Limitations
|
||||||
|
**Problem:** When spawning background agents via the Task tool for parallel work (agents a6d8fe7 and a6890a8), they were auto-denied Edit/Write/Bash permissions and couldn't complete their work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Solution:** Had to complete the work manually in the main session where permissions were available.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Prevention:** Don't rely on background agents for tasks requiring file modifications. Either:
|
||||||
|
- Run file-modifying tasks sequentially in main session
|
||||||
|
- Use background agents only for read-only exploration/research
|
||||||
|
- Accept that background agents work best for analysis, not implementation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 2. Documentation Drift Accumulates Silently
|
||||||
|
**Problem:** During `/doc-audit`, discovered:
|
||||||
|
- CLAUDE.md version was 5.1.0 when it should be 5.2.0
|
||||||
|
- 10 plugin versions in marketplace.json didn't match CHANGELOG entries
|
||||||
|
- 18 commands from Sprint 4 & 5 were missing from README.md and COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Solution:** Ran `/doc-sync` to batch-update all documentation in one commit.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Prevention:**
|
||||||
|
- Run `/doc-audit` at sprint close before lessons capture
|
||||||
|
- Add documentation verification to sprint close checklist
|
||||||
|
- Consider adding doc-coverage check to CI
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 3. Documentation Coverage Gaps in Core Code
|
||||||
|
**Problem:** Documentation coverage analysis revealed:
|
||||||
|
- Overall: 69.6% (below 80% "Good" threshold)
|
||||||
|
- gitea_client.py: Only 33% coverage with 32 undocumented public methods
|
||||||
|
- NetBox tools: 50% coverage (class docs but no method docs)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Solution:** Identified as technical debt for future sprint.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Prevention:**
|
||||||
|
- Add docstring requirements to PR review checklist
|
||||||
|
- Consider adding doc coverage to CI (fail below 80%)
|
||||||
|
- Prioritize documenting high-traffic files like gitea_client.py
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 4. Visual Branding Template Efficiency
|
||||||
|
**Problem:** Adding visual output sections to 109 files could have been tedious.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Solution:** Created Wiki specification pages first (branding/visual-spec, branding/plugin-registry, etc.) as single source of truth, then used consistent templates.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Prevention:**
|
||||||
|
- Always create spec/template in Wiki before bulk implementation
|
||||||
|
- Use search-and-add patterns for consistent sections
|
||||||
|
- Group by plugin to maintain context
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Tags
|
||||||
|
documentation, visual-branding, background-agents, permissions, doc-audit, code-coverage, wiki, templates
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
**Tags:** documentation, visual-branding, background-agents, permissions, doc-audit, templates, sprint-6
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user