✅ Task 1.1 - Project Foundation Setup: - Repository structure with Python packaging (setup.py, pyproject.toml) - Development dependencies and requirements - Contributing guidelines and MIT license - GitHub workflows for CI/CD (test.yml, release.yml) - Issue and PR templates for community contributions - Comprehensive project documentation ✅ Task 1.2 - Core Client Structure: - wikijs package with proper module organization - Core client class foundation in client.py - Exception hierarchy for error handling - Base model classes and page models - Type checking support (py.typed) - Utility modules and helper functions 📊 Progress: Phase 1 MVP Development now 40% complete 🎯 Next: Task 1.3 - Authentication System implementation 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
Pull Request
Description
Brief description of what this PR does and why.
Type of Change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
- Documentation update
- Performance improvement
- Code refactoring (no functional changes)
- Test improvements
Related Issues
Closes #(issue_number) Relates to #(issue_number)
Changes Made
Testing
- Tests pass locally
- Added tests for new functionality
- Updated existing tests
- Manual testing completed
Describe any testing you performed:
Documentation
- Updated docstrings
- Updated README if needed
- Updated API documentation
- Added/updated examples
Code Quality
- Code follows the style guidelines
- Self-review of the code completed
- Code is commented where necessary
- No new warnings introduced
Breaking Changes
If this introduces breaking changes, please describe them and provide migration guidance:
Screenshots/Examples
If applicable, add screenshots or code examples to help explain your changes.
# Example usage
Additional Notes
Any additional information that reviewers should know.
Reviewer Checklist
- Code follows project style guidelines
- Changes are well documented
- Tests are adequate and pass
- No obvious bugs or performance issues
- Breaking changes are properly documented