docs: add comprehensive status update for label creation
Status: Labels Created & Verified - Ready for Plugin Testing Summary: - ✅ 43 labels created in Gitea (27 org + 16 repo) - ✅ MCP server verified working (100% test pass) - ✅ Label suggestions tested and accurate - ✅ Documentation complete Next: Full plugin functional testing 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
164
docs/STATUS_UPDATE_2025-11-21.md
Normal file
164
docs/STATUS_UPDATE_2025-11-21.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
|
||||
# Status Update: Projman Plugin - Label Creation Complete
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2025-11-21
|
||||
**Branch:** feat/projman
|
||||
**Status:** ✅ Labels Created & Verified - Ready for Plugin Testing
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Successfully completed label creation for the Projman plugin! All 43 labels have been created in Gitea and verified working with the MCP server.
|
||||
|
||||
## What Was Accomplished
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Label Creation ✅
|
||||
- **Created 27 organization labels** in hhl-infra organization
|
||||
- **Created 16 repository labels** in claude-code-hhl-toolkit repository
|
||||
- **Total: 43 labels** (corrected from initial documentation of 44)
|
||||
- All labels created programmatically via Gitea API
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. MCP Server Verification ✅
|
||||
- Verified MCP server fetches all 27 organization labels
|
||||
- Verified MCP server fetches all 16 repository labels
|
||||
- Tested label suggestion logic - working correctly
|
||||
- Configuration loading from both system and project levels verified
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Documentation ✅
|
||||
- Created `create_labels.py` - reusable label creation script
|
||||
- Created `LABEL_CREATION_COMPLETE.md` - detailed label documentation
|
||||
- Created `test_mcp_labels.py` - comprehensive label fetching test
|
||||
- Created this status update
|
||||
|
||||
## Label Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
### Organization Labels (27)
|
||||
- **Agent:** 2 labels (Human, Claude)
|
||||
- **Complexity:** 3 labels (Simple, Medium, Complex)
|
||||
- **Efforts:** 5 labels (XS, S, M, L, XL)
|
||||
- **Priority:** 4 labels (Low, Medium, High, Critical)
|
||||
- **Risk:** 3 labels (Low, Medium, High)
|
||||
- **Source:** 4 labels (Development, Staging, Production, Customer)
|
||||
- **Type:** 6 labels (Bug, Feature, Refactor, Documentation, Test, Chore)
|
||||
|
||||
### Repository Labels (16)
|
||||
- **Component:** 9 labels (Backend, Frontend, API, Database, Auth, Deploy, Testing, Docs, Infra)
|
||||
- **Tech:** 7 labels (Python, JavaScript, Docker, PostgreSQL, Redis, Vue, FastAPI)
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Results
|
||||
|
||||
### MCP Server Label Fetching Test
|
||||
```
|
||||
✅ Organization labels: 27/27 (100%)
|
||||
✅ Repository labels: 16/16 (100%)
|
||||
✅ Total labels: 43/43 (100%)
|
||||
✅ Label suggestions working correctly
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Label Suggestion Examples
|
||||
1. **"Fix critical bug in authentication service causing login failures"**
|
||||
- Suggested: Type/Bug, Priority/Critical, Complexity/Medium, Efforts/L, Component/Backend, Component/Auth
|
||||
|
||||
2. **"Add new feature to export reports to PDF format"**
|
||||
- Suggested: Type/Feature, Priority/Medium, Complexity/Medium, Efforts/S
|
||||
|
||||
3. **"Refactor backend API to extract authentication service"**
|
||||
- Suggested: Type/Refactor, Priority/Medium, Complexity/Medium, Component/Backend, Component/API, Component/Auth
|
||||
|
||||
All suggestions are accurate and appropriate! 🎉
|
||||
|
||||
## Files Created/Modified
|
||||
|
||||
**New Files:**
|
||||
- `create_labels.py` - Label creation script (381 lines)
|
||||
- `test_mcp_labels.py` - MCP server label test (136 lines)
|
||||
- `docs/LABEL_CREATION_COMPLETE.md` - Label documentation
|
||||
- `docs/STATUS_UPDATE_2025-11-21.md` - This document
|
||||
|
||||
**Commits:**
|
||||
1. `73fb576` - feat: create all 43 labels in Gitea (27 org + 16 repo)
|
||||
2. `3e571f0` - test: verify MCP server fetches all 43 labels correctly
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation Correction
|
||||
|
||||
**Original Documentation:** 44 labels (28 org + 16 repo)
|
||||
**Actual Count:** 43 labels (27 org + 16 repo)
|
||||
|
||||
**Explanation:** The CREATE_LABELS_GUIDE.md stated 28 organization labels but only listed 27. The math confirms 27 is correct: 2+3+5+4+3+4+6 = 27.
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Details
|
||||
|
||||
**Gitea Configuration:**
|
||||
- API URL: `https://gitea.hotserv.cloud/api/v1`
|
||||
- Organization: `hhl-infra`
|
||||
- Repository: `claude-code-hhl-toolkit`
|
||||
- Token: Configured in `~/.config/claude/gitea.env`
|
||||
|
||||
**MCP Server:**
|
||||
- Location: `mcp-servers/gitea/`
|
||||
- Mode: Project mode (single-repo)
|
||||
- Config: Hybrid (system + project level)
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
Now that labels are created and verified, we can proceed with full plugin testing:
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Next Steps:
|
||||
1. ⏭️ **Test `/sprint-plan` command** - Verify it can create issues with labels
|
||||
2. ⏭️ **Test `/labels-sync` command** - Verify it updates labels-reference.md
|
||||
3. ⏭️ **Create test issues** - Validate label assignment works in Gitea UI
|
||||
4. ⏭️ **Test label suggestions** - Try sprint planning with different contexts
|
||||
|
||||
### Full Workflow Testing (After Basic Tests):
|
||||
1. Complete sprint planning workflow
|
||||
2. Test sprint start and orchestration
|
||||
3. Verify sprint status reporting
|
||||
4. Test sprint close and lessons learned
|
||||
5. Execute complete end-to-end sprint cycle
|
||||
|
||||
### Before User Testing:
|
||||
- ✅ Phase 1: MCP Servers (Complete)
|
||||
- ✅ Phase 2: Commands (Complete)
|
||||
- ✅ Phase 3: Agents (Complete)
|
||||
- ✅ Labels Created (Complete)
|
||||
- ⏭️ Phase 4: Functional Testing (Next)
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Notes
|
||||
|
||||
### Gitea API Behavior
|
||||
When querying `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/labels`, Gitea returns only repository-specific labels (16 labels). Organization labels don't appear in this endpoint but are still available for issue tagging.
|
||||
|
||||
The MCP server correctly handles this by:
|
||||
1. Fetching org labels via `/orgs/{owner}/labels` (27 labels)
|
||||
2. Fetching repo labels via `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/labels` (16 labels)
|
||||
3. Merging both sets for a total of 43 available labels
|
||||
|
||||
See `mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/tools/labels.py:29` for implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
### Label Suggestion Algorithm
|
||||
The label suggestion logic uses keyword matching and context analysis to recommend appropriate labels. It correctly:
|
||||
- Detects issue type from keywords (bug, feature, refactor, etc.)
|
||||
- Infers priority from urgency indicators
|
||||
- Identifies affected components from technical terms
|
||||
- Suggests tech stack labels based on mentioned technologies
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ All 43 labels created successfully (0 errors)
|
||||
- ✅ MCP server verified working (100% test pass rate)
|
||||
- ✅ Label suggestions tested and accurate
|
||||
- ✅ Configuration validated (system + project)
|
||||
- ✅ Documentation complete and accurate
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
**The label taxonomy is complete and fully functional!** All 43 labels are created in Gitea, the MCP server can fetch them correctly, and the label suggestion system is working beautifully.
|
||||
|
||||
We're now ready to move forward with comprehensive plugin testing. The blocking issue from the previous testing session has been resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
**Status: Ready for Plugin Functional Testing** 🚀
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Previous Session Issue:** Repository had 0 labels
|
||||
**Resolution:** Created all 43 labels programmatically
|
||||
**Verification:** MCP server test passed 100%
|
||||
**Blocker Status:** ✅ RESOLVED
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user