fix(commands): wire dispatch files to real sub-command names via Skill tool
All dispatch files referenced display names (e.g., `/doc audit`) that don't correspond to real slash commands. Claude Code resolves commands by filename, so `/doc audit` loads `doc.md` with $ARGUMENTS but never routes to `doc-audit.md`. Changes: - Updated 24 dispatch files with explicit Skill tool routing - Added "Command to Invoke" column with plugin-prefixed names - Added $ARGUMENTS matching for automatic routing - RFC dispatch file uses inline handling (no separate command files) - Updated COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md with invocation methods - Updated MIGRATION-v9.md with command name mapping explanation Affects: 25 dispatch files across 12 plugins (core, data, saas, ops, debug) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ When invoked without a sub-command, display available actions and ask which to r
|
||||
|
||||
## Available Commands
|
||||
|
||||
| Command | Description |
|
||||
|---------|-------------|
|
||||
| `/project initiation` | Analyze source, create charter, decompose into epics |
|
||||
| `/project plan` | Create WBS, risk register, sprint roadmap |
|
||||
| `/project status` | Full project hierarchy view |
|
||||
| `/project close` | Retrospective, lessons learned, archive |
|
||||
| Action | Command to Invoke | Description |
|
||||
|--------|-------------------|-------------|
|
||||
| `initiation` | `/projman:project-initiation` | Analyze source, create charter, decompose into epics |
|
||||
| `plan` | `/projman:project-plan` | Create WBS, risk register, sprint roadmap |
|
||||
| `status` | `/projman:project-status` | Full project hierarchy view |
|
||||
| `close` | `/projman:project-close` | Retrospective, lessons learned, archive |
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,8 +27,16 @@ When invoked without a sub-command, display available actions and ask which to r
|
||||
/project close <project-name>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
## Routing
|
||||
|
||||
1. Display the table above
|
||||
2. Ask: "Which command would you like to run?"
|
||||
3. Route to the selected sub-command
|
||||
If `$ARGUMENTS` is provided (e.g., user typed `/project initiation`):
|
||||
1. Match the first word of `$ARGUMENTS` against the **Action** column above
|
||||
2. **Invoke the corresponding command** from the "Command to Invoke" column using the Skill tool
|
||||
3. Pass any remaining arguments to the invoked command
|
||||
|
||||
If no arguments provided:
|
||||
1. Display the Available Commands table
|
||||
2. Ask: "Which action would you like to run?"
|
||||
3. When the user responds, invoke the matching command using the Skill tool
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** Commands can also be invoked directly using their plugin-prefixed names (e.g., `/projman:project-initiation`)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user