fix(commands): wire dispatch files to real sub-command names via Skill tool
All dispatch files referenced display names (e.g., `/doc audit`) that don't correspond to real slash commands. Claude Code resolves commands by filename, so `/doc audit` loads `doc.md` with $ARGUMENTS but never routes to `doc-audit.md`. Changes: - Updated 24 dispatch files with explicit Skill tool routing - Added "Command to Invoke" column with plugin-prefixed names - Added $ARGUMENTS matching for automatic routing - RFC dispatch file uses inline handling (no separate command files) - Updated COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md with invocation methods - Updated MIGRATION-v9.md with command name mapping explanation Affects: 25 dispatch files across 12 plugins (core, data, saas, ops, debug) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ agent: planner
|
||||
|
||||
Manage the full RFC lifecycle through sub-commands. RFCs provide a structured way to document, discuss, and approve changes before implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
When invoked without a sub-command, display available actions and ask which to run.
|
||||
When invoked without a sub-command or with `$ARGUMENTS`, handle sub-commands inline using the documentation below.
|
||||
|
||||
## Invocation
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,11 +34,19 @@ When invoked without a sub-command, display available actions and ask which to r
|
||||
| `approve` | `/rfc approve <number>` | Approve RFC in Review status |
|
||||
| `reject` | `/rfc reject <number>` | Reject RFC with documented reason |
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow
|
||||
## Routing
|
||||
|
||||
1. Display the table above
|
||||
If `$ARGUMENTS` is provided (e.g., user typed `/rfc create`):
|
||||
1. Match the first word of `$ARGUMENTS` against the Command column above
|
||||
2. Execute the corresponding sub-command using the inline documentation below
|
||||
3. Pass any remaining arguments to the sub-command handler
|
||||
|
||||
If no arguments provided:
|
||||
1. Display the Available Commands table
|
||||
2. Ask: "Which command would you like to run?"
|
||||
3. Route to the selected sub-command
|
||||
3. When the user responds, execute the matching sub-command using the inline documentation below
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** RFC commands are handled inline in this file - there are no separate command files to invoke.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user