1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
99a0d137cd fix(marketplace): remove integrates_with field (schema violation)
Claude Code's marketplace schema does not support custom fields.
The `integrates_with` field on data-platform and viz-platform caused:
"Invalid schema: plugins.9: Unrecognized key: integrates_with"

This reverts the schema extension while keeping the validate_workflow_integration
MCP tool functional (it reads from plugin.json files directly, not marketplace.json).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-02 11:43:03 -05:00
44 changed files with 557 additions and 1122 deletions

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
},
"metadata": {
"description": "Project management plugins with Gitea and NetBox integrations",
"version": "5.8.0"
"version": "5.7.1"
},
"plugins": [
{

View File

@@ -1,249 +0,0 @@
# CLAUDE.md
This file provides guidance to Claude Code when working with code in this repository.
## Project Overview
**Repository:** leo-claude-mktplace
**Version:** 3.0.1
**Status:** Production Ready
A plugin marketplace for Claude Code containing:
| Plugin | Description | Version |
|--------|-------------|---------|
| `projman` | Sprint planning and project management with Gitea integration | 3.0.0 |
| `git-flow` | Git workflow automation with smart commits and branch management | 1.0.0 |
| `pr-review` | Multi-agent PR review with confidence scoring | 1.0.0 |
| `clarity-assist` | Prompt optimization with ND-friendly accommodations | 1.0.0 |
| `doc-guardian` | Automatic documentation drift detection and synchronization | 1.0.0 |
| `code-sentinel` | Security scanning and code refactoring tools | 1.0.0 |
| `claude-config-maintainer` | CLAUDE.md optimization and maintenance | 1.0.0 |
| `cmdb-assistant` | NetBox CMDB integration for infrastructure management | 1.0.0 |
| `project-hygiene` | Post-task cleanup automation via hooks | 0.1.0 |
## Quick Start
```bash
# Validate marketplace compliance
./scripts/validate-marketplace.sh
# Setup commands (in a target project with plugin installed)
/initial-setup # First time: full setup wizard
/project-init # New project: quick config
/project-sync # After repo move: sync config
# Run projman commands
/sprint-plan # Start sprint planning
/sprint-status # Check progress
/review # Pre-close code quality review
/test-check # Verify tests before close
/sprint-close # Complete sprint
```
## Repository Structure
```
leo-claude-mktplace/
├── .claude-plugin/
│ └── marketplace.json # Marketplace manifest
├── mcp-servers/ # SHARED MCP servers (v3.0.0+)
│ ├── gitea/ # Gitea MCP (issues, PRs, wiki)
│ └── netbox/ # NetBox MCP (CMDB)
├── plugins/
│ ├── projman/ # Sprint management
│ │ ├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json
│ │ ├── .mcp.json
│ │ ├── mcp-servers/gitea -> ../../../mcp-servers/gitea # SYMLINK
│ │ ├── commands/ # 12 commands (incl. setup)
│ │ ├── hooks/ # SessionStart mismatch detection
│ │ ├── agents/ # 4 agents
│ │ └── skills/label-taxonomy/
│ ├── git-flow/ # Git workflow automation
│ │ ├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json
│ │ ├── commands/ # 8 commands
│ │ └── agents/
│ ├── pr-review/ # Multi-agent PR review
│ │ ├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json
│ │ ├── .mcp.json
│ │ ├── mcp-servers/gitea -> ../../../mcp-servers/gitea # SYMLINK
│ │ ├── commands/ # 6 commands (incl. setup)
│ │ ├── hooks/ # SessionStart mismatch detection
│ │ └── agents/ # 5 agents
│ ├── clarity-assist/ # Prompt optimization (NEW v3.0.0)
│ │ ├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json
│ │ ├── commands/ # 2 commands
│ │ └── agents/
│ ├── doc-guardian/ # Documentation drift detection
│ ├── code-sentinel/ # Security scanning & refactoring
│ ├── claude-config-maintainer/
│ ├── cmdb-assistant/
│ └── project-hygiene/
├── scripts/
│ ├── setup.sh, post-update.sh
│ └── validate-marketplace.sh # Marketplace compliance validation
└── docs/
├── CANONICAL-PATHS.md # Single source of truth for paths
└── CONFIGURATION.md # Centralized configuration guide
```
## CRITICAL: Rules You MUST Follow
### File Operations
- **NEVER** create files in repository root unless listed in "Allowed Root Files"
- **NEVER** modify `.gitignore` without explicit permission
- **ALWAYS** use `.scratch/` for temporary/exploratory work
- **ALWAYS** verify paths against `docs/CANONICAL-PATHS.md` before creating files
### Plugin Development
- **plugin.json MUST be in `.claude-plugin/` directory** (not plugin root)
- **Every plugin MUST be listed in marketplace.json**
- **MCP servers are SHARED at root** with symlinks from plugins
- **MCP server venv path**: `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/mcp-servers/{name}/.venv/bin/python`
- **CLI tools forbidden** - Use MCP tools exclusively (never `tea`, `gh`, etc.)
### Hooks (Valid Events Only)
`PreToolUse`, `PostToolUse`, `UserPromptSubmit`, `SessionStart`, `SessionEnd`, `Notification`, `Stop`, `SubagentStop`, `PreCompact`
**INVALID:** `task-completed`, `file-changed`, `git-commit-msg-needed`
### Allowed Root Files
`CLAUDE.md`, `README.md`, `LICENSE`, `CHANGELOG.md`, `.gitignore`, `.env.example`
### Allowed Root Directories
`.claude/`, `.claude-plugin/`, `.claude-plugins/`, `.scratch/`, `docs/`, `hooks/`, `mcp-servers/`, `plugins/`, `scripts/`
## Architecture
### Four-Agent Model (projman)
| Agent | Personality | Responsibilities |
|-------|-------------|------------------|
| **Planner** | Thoughtful, methodical | Sprint planning, architecture analysis, issue creation, lesson search |
| **Orchestrator** | Concise, action-oriented | Sprint execution, parallel batching, Git operations, lesson capture |
| **Executor** | Implementation-focused | Code implementation, branch management, MR creation |
| **Code Reviewer** | Thorough, practical | Pre-close quality review, security scan, test verification |
### MCP Server Tools (Gitea)
| Category | Tools |
|----------|-------|
| Issues | `list_issues`, `get_issue`, `create_issue`, `update_issue`, `add_comment` |
| Labels | `get_labels`, `suggest_labels`, `create_label` |
| Milestones | `list_milestones`, `get_milestone`, `create_milestone`, `update_milestone` |
| Dependencies | `list_issue_dependencies`, `create_issue_dependency`, `get_execution_order` |
| Wiki | `list_wiki_pages`, `get_wiki_page`, `create_wiki_page`, `create_lesson`, `search_lessons` |
| **Pull Requests** | `list_pull_requests`, `get_pull_request`, `get_pr_diff`, `get_pr_comments`, `create_pr_review`, `add_pr_comment` *(NEW v3.0.0)* |
| Validation | `validate_repo_org`, `get_branch_protection` |
### Hybrid Configuration
| Level | Location | Purpose |
|-------|----------|---------|
| System | `~/.config/claude/gitea.env` | Credentials (GITEA_API_URL, GITEA_API_TOKEN) |
| Project | `.env` in project root | Repository specification (GITEA_ORG, GITEA_REPO) |
**Note:** `GITEA_ORG` is at project level since different projects may belong to different organizations.
### Branch-Aware Security
| Branch Pattern | Mode | Capabilities |
|----------------|------|--------------|
| `development`, `feat/*` | Development | Full access |
| `staging` | Staging | Read-only code, can create issues |
| `main`, `master` | Production | Read-only, emergency only |
## Label Taxonomy
43 labels total: 27 organization + 16 repository
**Organization:** Agent/2, Complexity/3, Efforts/5, Priority/4, Risk/3, Source/4, Type/6
**Repository:** Component/9, Tech/7
Sync with `/labels-sync` command.
## Lessons Learned System
Stored in Gitea Wiki under `lessons-learned/sprints/`.
**Workflow:**
1. Orchestrator captures at sprint close via MCP tools
2. Planner searches at sprint start using `search_lessons`
3. Tags enable cross-project discovery
## Common Operations
### Adding a New Plugin
1. Create `plugins/{name}/.claude-plugin/plugin.json`
2. Add entry to `.claude-plugin/marketplace.json` with category, tags, license
3. Create `README.md` and `claude-md-integration.md`
4. If using MCP server, create symlink: `ln -s ../../../mcp-servers/{server} plugins/{name}/mcp-servers/{server}`
5. Run `./scripts/validate-marketplace.sh`
6. Update `CHANGELOG.md`
### Adding a Command to projman
1. Create `plugins/projman/commands/{name}.md`
2. Update `plugins/projman/README.md`
3. Update marketplace description if significant
### Validation
```bash
./scripts/validate-marketplace.sh # Validates all manifests
```
## Path Verification Protocol
**Before creating any file:**
1. Read `docs/CANONICAL-PATHS.md`
2. List all paths to be created/modified
3. Verify each against canonical paths
4. If not in canonical paths, STOP and ask
## Documentation Index
| Document | Purpose |
|----------|---------|
| `docs/CANONICAL-PATHS.md` | **Single source of truth** for paths |
| `docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md` | All commands quick reference with workflow examples |
| `docs/CONFIGURATION.md` | Centralized setup guide |
| `docs/UPDATING.md` | Update guide for the marketplace |
| `plugins/projman/CONFIGURATION.md` | Quick reference (links to central) |
| `plugins/projman/README.md` | Projman full documentation |
## Versioning and Changelog Rules
### Version Display
**The marketplace version is displayed ONLY in the main `README.md` title.**
- Format: `# Leo Claude Marketplace - vX.Y.Z`
- Do NOT add version numbers to individual plugin documentation titles
- Do NOT add version numbers to configuration guides
- Do NOT add version numbers to CLAUDE.md or other docs
### Changelog Maintenance (MANDATORY)
**`CHANGELOG.md` is the authoritative source for version history.**
When releasing a new version:
1. Update main `README.md` title with new version
2. Update `CHANGELOG.md` with:
- Version number and date: `## [X.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD`
- **Added**: New features, commands, files
- **Changed**: Modifications to existing functionality
- **Fixed**: Bug fixes
- **Removed**: Deleted features, files, deprecated items
3. Update `marketplace.json` metadata version
4. Update plugin `plugin.json` versions if plugin-specific changes
### Version Format
- Follow [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/): MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
- MAJOR: Breaking changes
- MINOR: New features, backward compatible
- PATCH: Bug fixes, minor improvements
---
**Last Updated:** 2026-01-20

View File

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
# Doc Guardian Queue - cleared after sync on 2026-02-02
2026-02-02T11:41:00 | .claude-plugin | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json | CLAUDE.md .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
2026-02-02T13:35:48 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/sprint-approval.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:36:03 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/sprint-start.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:36:16 | agents | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/agents/orchestrator.md | README.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:39:07 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/rfc.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:39:15 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/setup.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:39:32 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/rfc-workflow.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:43:14 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/rfc-templates.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:44:55 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/sprint-lifecycle.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:45:04 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/label-taxonomy/labels-reference.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:45:14 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/sprint-plan.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:45:48 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/review.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:46:07 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/sprint-close.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:46:21 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/sprint-status.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:46:38 | agents | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/agents/planner.md | README.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:46:57 | agents | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/agents/code-reviewer.md | README.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:49:13 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/viz-platform/commands/design-gate.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:49:24 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/data-platform/commands/data-gate.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-02-02T13:49:35 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/domain-consultation.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:50:04 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/validation_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:50:59 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/server.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:51:32 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/tests/test_validation_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:51:49 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/contract-validator/skills/validation-rules.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:52:07 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/contract-validator/skills/mcp-tools-reference.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:59:09 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/progress-tracking.md | README.md
2026-02-02T14:01:34 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/test.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md

1
.env
View File

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
GITEA_REPO=personal-projects/leo-claude-mktplace

View File

@@ -4,64 +4,6 @@ All notable changes to the Leo Claude Marketplace will be documented in this fil
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/).
## [5.8.0] - 2026-02-02
### Added
#### Projman Hardening Sprint
Targeted improvements to safety gates, command structure, lifecycle tracking, and cross-plugin contracts.
**Sprint Lifecycle State Machine:**
- New `skills/sprint-lifecycle.md` - defines valid states and transitions via milestone metadata
- States: idle -> Sprint/Planning -> Sprint/Executing -> Sprint/Reviewing -> idle
- All sprint commands check and set lifecycle state on entry/exit
- Out-of-order calls produce warnings with guidance, `--force` override available
**Sprint Dispatch Log:**
- Orchestrator now maintains a structured dispatch log during execution
- Records task dispatch, completion, failure, gate checks, and resume events
- Enables timeline reconstruction after interrupted sessions
**Gate Contract Versioning:**
- Gate commands (`/design-gate`, `/data-gate`) declare `gate_contract: v1` in frontmatter
- `domain-consultation.md` Gate Command Reference includes expected contract version
- `validate_workflow_integration` now checks contract version compatibility
- Mismatch produces WARNING, missing contract produces INFO suggestion
**Shared Visual Output Skill:**
- New `skills/visual-output.md` - single source of truth for projman visual headers
- All 4 agent files reference the skill instead of inline templates
- Phase Registry maps agents to emoji and phase names
### Changed
**Sprint Approval Gate Hardened:**
- Approval is now a hard block, not a warning (was "recommended", now required)
- `--force` flag added to bypass in emergencies (logged to milestone)
- Consistent language across sprint-approval.md, sprint-start.md, and orchestrator.md
**RFC Commands Normalized:**
- 5 individual commands (`/rfc-create`, `/rfc-list`, `/rfc-review`, `/rfc-approve`, `/rfc-reject`) consolidated into `/rfc create|list|review|approve|reject`
- `/clear-cache` absorbed into `/setup --clear-cache`
- Command count reduced from 17 to 12
**`/test` Command Documentation Expanded:**
- Sprint integration section (pre-close verification workflow)
- Concrete usage examples for all modes
- Edge cases table
- DO NOT rules for both modes
### Removed
- `plugins/projman/commands/rfc-create.md` (replaced by `/rfc create`)
- `plugins/projman/commands/rfc-list.md` (replaced by `/rfc list`)
- `plugins/projman/commands/rfc-review.md` (replaced by `/rfc review`)
- `plugins/projman/commands/rfc-approve.md` (replaced by `/rfc approve`)
- `plugins/projman/commands/rfc-reject.md` (replaced by `/rfc reject`)
- `plugins/projman/commands/clear-cache.md` (replaced by `/setup --clear-cache`)
---
## [5.7.1] - 2026-02-02
### Added

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Leo Claude Marketplace - v5.8.0
# Leo Claude Marketplace - v5.7.1
A collection of Claude Code plugins for project management, infrastructure automation, and development workflows.
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ AI-guided sprint planning with full Gitea integration. Transforms a proven 15-sp
- Branch-aware security (development/staging/production)
- Pre-sprint-close code quality review and test verification
**Commands:** `/sprint-plan`, `/sprint-start`, `/sprint-status`, `/sprint-close`, `/labels-sync`, `/setup`, `/review`, `/test`, `/debug`, `/suggest-version`, `/proposal-status`, `/rfc`
**Commands:** `/sprint-plan`, `/sprint-start`, `/sprint-status`, `/sprint-close`, `/labels-sync`, `/setup`, `/review`, `/test`, `/debug`, `/suggest-version`, `/proposal-status`, `/clear-cache`, `/rfc-create`, `/rfc-list`, `/rfc-review`, `/rfc-approve`, `/rfc-reject`
#### [git-flow](./plugins/git-flow) *NEW in v3.0.0*
**Git Workflow Automation**

View File

@@ -9,18 +9,23 @@ Quick reference for all commands in the Leo Claude Marketplace.
| Plugin | Command | Auto | Manual | Description |
|--------|---------|:----:|:------:|-------------|
| **projman** | `/sprint-plan` | | X | Start sprint planning with AI-guided architecture analysis and issue creation |
| **projman** | `/sprint-start` | | X | Begin sprint execution with dependency analysis and parallel task coordination (requires approval or `--force`) |
| **projman** | `/sprint-start` | | X | Begin sprint execution with dependency analysis and parallel task coordination |
| **projman** | `/sprint-status` | | X | Check current sprint progress (add `--diagram` for Mermaid visualization) |
| **projman** | `/review` | | X | Pre-sprint-close code quality review (debug artifacts, security, error handling) |
| **projman** | `/test` | | X | Run tests (`/test run`) or generate tests (`/test gen <target>`) |
| **projman** | `/sprint-close` | | X | Complete sprint and capture lessons learned to Gitea Wiki |
| **projman** | `/labels-sync` | | X | Synchronize label taxonomy from Gitea |
| **projman** | `/setup` | | X | Auto-detect mode or use `--full`, `--quick`, `--sync`, `--clear-cache` |
| **projman** | `/setup` | | X | Auto-detect mode or use `--full`, `--quick`, `--sync` |
| **projman** | *SessionStart hook* | X | | Detects git remote vs .env mismatch, warns to run `/setup --sync` |
| **projman** | `/debug` | | X | Diagnostics (`/debug report`) or investigate (`/debug review`) |
| **projman** | `/suggest-version` | | X | Analyze CHANGELOG and recommend semantic version bump |
| **projman** | `/proposal-status` | | X | View proposal and implementation hierarchy with status |
| **projman** | `/rfc` | | X | RFC lifecycle management (`/rfc create\|list\|review\|approve\|reject`) |
| **projman** | `/clear-cache` | | X | Clear plugin cache to force fresh configuration reload |
| **projman** | `/rfc-create` | | X | Create new RFC from conversation or clarified spec |
| **projman** | `/rfc-list` | | X | List all RFCs grouped by status |
| **projman** | `/rfc-review` | | X | Submit Draft RFC for review |
| **projman** | `/rfc-approve` | | X | Approve RFC in Review status for sprint planning |
| **projman** | `/rfc-reject` | | X | Reject RFC with documented reason |
| **git-flow** | `/commit` | | X | Create commit with auto-generated conventional message |
| **git-flow** | `/commit-push` | | X | Commit and push to remote in one operation |
| **git-flow** | `/commit-merge` | | X | Commit current changes, then merge into target branch |
@@ -139,11 +144,11 @@ Full workflow from idea to implementation using RFCs:
```
1. /clarify # Clarify the feature idea
2. /rfc create # Create RFC from clarified spec
2. /rfc-create # Create RFC from clarified spec
... refine RFC content ...
3. /rfc review 0001 # Submit RFC for review
3. /rfc-review 0001 # Submit RFC for review
... review discussion ...
4. /rfc approve 0001 # Approve RFC for implementation
4. /rfc-approve 0001 # Approve RFC for implementation
5. /sprint-plan # Select approved RFC for sprint
... implement feature ...
6. /sprint-close # Complete sprint, RFC marked Implemented

View File

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
2026-01-26T14:36:42 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T14:37:38 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T14:37:48 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T14:38:05 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T14:38:55 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T14:39:35 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T14:40:19 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T15:02:30 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/tests/test_parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T15:02:37 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/tests/test_parse_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T15:03:41 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/tests/test_report_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T10:56:19 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/mcp_server/validation_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T10:57:49 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/contract-validator/tests/test_validation_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T10:58:22 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/contract-validator/skills/mcp-tools-reference.md | README.md
2026-02-02T10:58:38 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/contract-validator/skills/validation-rules.md | README.md
2026-02-02T10:59:13 | .claude-plugin | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json | CLAUDE.md .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
2026-02-02T13:55:33 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/visual-output.md | README.md
2026-02-02T13:55:41 | agents | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/agents/planner.md | README.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:55:55 | agents | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/agents/orchestrator.md | README.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:56:14 | agents | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/agents/executor.md | README.md CLAUDE.md
2026-02-02T13:56:34 | agents | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/agents/code-reviewer.md | README.md CLAUDE.md

View File

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ class ContractValidatorMCPServer:
),
Tool(
name="validate_workflow_integration",
description="Validate that a domain plugin exposes the required advisory interfaces (gate command, review command, advisory agent) expected by projman's domain-consultation skill. Also checks gate contract version compatibility.",
description="Validate that a domain plugin exposes the required advisory interfaces (gate command, review command, advisory agent) expected by projman's domain-consultation skill",
inputSchema={
"type": "object",
"properties": {
@@ -144,10 +144,6 @@ class ContractValidatorMCPServer:
"domain_label": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The Domain/* label it claims to handle, e.g. Domain/Viz"
},
"expected_contract": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Expected contract version (e.g., 'v1'). If provided, validates the gate command's contract matches."
}
},
"required": ["plugin_path", "domain_label"]
@@ -265,16 +261,9 @@ class ContractValidatorMCPServer:
"""Validate agent data flow"""
return await self.validation_tools.validate_data_flow(agent_name, claude_md_path)
async def _validate_workflow_integration(
self,
plugin_path: str,
domain_label: str,
expected_contract: str = None
) -> dict:
async def _validate_workflow_integration(self, plugin_path: str, domain_label: str) -> dict:
"""Validate domain plugin exposes required advisory interfaces"""
return await self.validation_tools.validate_workflow_integration(
plugin_path, domain_label, expected_contract
)
return await self.validation_tools.validate_workflow_integration(plugin_path, domain_label)
# Report tool implementations (Issue #188)

View File

@@ -72,7 +72,6 @@ class WorkflowIntegrationResult(BaseModel):
domain_label: str
valid: bool
gate_command_found: bool
gate_contract: Optional[str] = None # Contract version declared by gate command
review_command_found: bool
advisory_agent_found: bool
issues: list[ValidationIssue] = []
@@ -350,32 +349,22 @@ class ValidationTools:
return result.model_dump()
async def validate_workflow_integration(
self,
plugin_path: str,
domain_label: str,
expected_contract: Optional[str] = None
) -> dict:
async def validate_workflow_integration(self, plugin_path: str, domain_label: str) -> dict:
"""
Validate that a domain plugin exposes required advisory interfaces.
Checks for:
- Gate command (e.g., /design-gate, /data-gate) - REQUIRED
- Gate contract version (gate_contract in frontmatter) - INFO if missing
- Review command (e.g., /design-review, /data-review) - recommended
- Advisory agent referencing the domain label - recommended
Args:
plugin_path: Path to the domain plugin directory
domain_label: The Domain/* label it claims to handle (e.g., Domain/Viz)
expected_contract: Expected contract version (e.g., 'v1'). If provided,
validates the gate command's contract matches.
Returns:
Validation result with found interfaces and issues
"""
import re
plugin_path_obj = Path(plugin_path)
issues = []
@@ -394,7 +383,6 @@ class ValidationTools:
# Check for gate command
commands_dir = plugin_path_obj / "commands"
gate_command_found = False
gate_contract = None
gate_patterns = ["pass", "fail", "PASS", "FAIL", "Binary pass/fail", "gate"]
if commands_dir.exists():
@@ -404,13 +392,6 @@ class ValidationTools:
content = cmd_file.read_text()
if any(pattern in content for pattern in gate_patterns):
gate_command_found = True
# Parse frontmatter for gate_contract
frontmatter_match = re.match(r'^---\n(.*?)\n---', content, re.DOTALL)
if frontmatter_match:
frontmatter = frontmatter_match.group(1)
contract_match = re.search(r'gate_contract:\s*(\S+)', frontmatter)
if contract_match:
gate_contract = contract_match.group(1)
break
if not gate_command_found:
@@ -460,31 +441,11 @@ class ValidationTools:
suggestion=f"Create agents/{domain_short}-advisor.md referencing '{domain_label}'"
))
# Check gate contract version
if gate_command_found:
if not gate_contract:
issues.append(ValidationIssue(
severity=IssueSeverity.INFO,
issue_type=IssueType.MISSING_INTEGRATION,
message=f"Gate command does not declare a contract version",
location=str(commands_dir),
suggestion="Consider adding `gate_contract: v1` to frontmatter for version tracking"
))
elif expected_contract and gate_contract != expected_contract:
issues.append(ValidationIssue(
severity=IssueSeverity.WARNING,
issue_type=IssueType.INTERFACE_MISMATCH,
message=f"Contract version mismatch: gate declares {gate_contract}, projman expects {expected_contract}",
location=str(commands_dir),
suggestion=f"Update domain-consultation.md Gate Command Reference table to {gate_contract}, or update gate command to {expected_contract}"
))
result = WorkflowIntegrationResult(
plugin_name=plugin_name,
domain_label=domain_label,
valid=gate_command_found, # Only gate is required for validity
gate_command_found=gate_command_found,
gate_contract=gate_contract,
review_command_found=review_command_found,
advisory_agent_found=advisory_agent_found,
issues=issues

View File

@@ -350,10 +350,7 @@ async def test_validate_workflow_integration_complete(validation_tools, domain_p
assert result["gate_command_found"] is True
assert result["review_command_found"] is True
assert result["advisory_agent_found"] is True
# May have INFO issue about missing contract version (not an error/warning)
error_or_warning = [i for i in result["issues"]
if i["severity"].value in ("error", "warning")]
assert len(error_or_warning) == 0
assert len(result["issues"]) == 0
@pytest.mark.asyncio
@@ -407,108 +404,3 @@ async def test_validate_workflow_integration_nonexistent_plugin(validation_tools
assert "error" in result
assert "not found" in result["error"].lower()
# --- Gate Contract Version Tests ---
@pytest.fixture
def domain_plugin_with_contract(tmp_path):
"""Create domain plugin with gate_contract: v1 in frontmatter"""
plugin_dir = tmp_path / "viz-platform-versioned"
plugin_dir.mkdir()
(plugin_dir / ".claude-plugin").mkdir()
(plugin_dir / "commands").mkdir()
(plugin_dir / "agents").mkdir()
# Gate command with gate_contract in frontmatter
gate_cmd = plugin_dir / "commands" / "design-gate.md"
gate_cmd.write_text("""---
description: Design system compliance gate (pass/fail)
gate_contract: v1
---
# /design-gate
Binary pass/fail validation gate for design system compliance.
## Output
- **PASS**: All design system checks passed
- **FAIL**: Design system violations detected
""")
# Review command
review_cmd = plugin_dir / "commands" / "design-review.md"
review_cmd.write_text("""# /design-review
Comprehensive design system audit.
""")
# Advisory agent
agent = plugin_dir / "agents" / "design-reviewer.md"
agent.write_text("""# design-reviewer
Design system compliance auditor for Domain/Viz issues.
""")
return str(plugin_dir)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_validate_workflow_contract_match(validation_tools, domain_plugin_with_contract):
"""Test that matching expected_contract produces no warning"""
result = await validation_tools.validate_workflow_integration(
domain_plugin_with_contract,
"Domain/Viz",
expected_contract="v1"
)
assert "error" not in result
assert result["valid"] is True
assert result["gate_contract"] == "v1"
# Should have no warnings about contract mismatch
warning_issues = [i for i in result["issues"] if i["severity"].value == "warning"]
contract_warnings = [i for i in warning_issues if "contract" in i["message"].lower()]
assert len(contract_warnings) == 0
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_validate_workflow_contract_mismatch(validation_tools, domain_plugin_with_contract):
"""Test that mismatched expected_contract produces WARNING"""
result = await validation_tools.validate_workflow_integration(
domain_plugin_with_contract,
"Domain/Viz",
expected_contract="v2" # Gate has v1
)
assert "error" not in result
assert result["valid"] is True # Contract mismatch doesn't affect validity
assert result["gate_contract"] == "v1"
# Should have warning about contract mismatch
warning_issues = [i for i in result["issues"] if i["severity"].value == "warning"]
contract_warnings = [i for i in warning_issues if "contract" in i["message"].lower()]
assert len(contract_warnings) == 1
assert "mismatch" in contract_warnings[0]["message"].lower()
assert "v1" in contract_warnings[0]["message"]
assert "v2" in contract_warnings[0]["message"]
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_validate_workflow_no_contract(validation_tools, domain_plugin_complete):
"""Test that missing gate_contract produces INFO suggestion"""
result = await validation_tools.validate_workflow_integration(
domain_plugin_complete,
"Domain/Viz"
)
assert "error" not in result
assert result["valid"] is True
assert result["gate_contract"] is None
# Should have info issue about missing contract
info_issues = [i for i in result["issues"] if i["severity"].value == "info"]
contract_info = [i for i in info_issues if "contract" in i["message"].lower()]
assert len(contract_info) == 1
assert "does not declare" in contract_info[0]["message"].lower()

View File

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
2026-01-26T11:40:11 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/viz-platform/registry/dmc_2_5.json | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T13:46:31 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/viz-platform/tests/test_chart_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T13:46:32 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/viz-platform/tests/test_theme_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T13:46:34 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/viz-platform/tests/test_theme_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md
2026-01-26T13:46:35 | mcp-servers | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/mcp-servers/viz-platform/tests/test_theme_tools.py | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md CLAUDE.md

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Available MCP tools for contract-validator operations.
| `validate_compatibility` | Check two plugins for conflicts |
| `validate_agent_refs` | Check agent tool references exist |
| `validate_data_flow` | Verify data flow through agent sequence |
| `validate_workflow_integration` | Check domain plugin exposes required advisory interfaces and gate contract version |
| `validate_workflow_integration` | Check domain plugin exposes required advisory interfaces |
### Report Tools
| Tool | Description |
@@ -57,9 +57,8 @@ Available MCP tools for contract-validator operations.
### Workflow Integration Check
```
1. validate_workflow_integration(plugin_path, domain_label) # Check single domain plugin
2. validate_workflow_integration(plugin_path, domain_label, expected_contract="v1") # With contract version check
3. For each domain in domain-consultation.md detection rules:
validate_workflow_integration(domain_plugin_path, domain_label, expected_contract)
2. For each domain in domain-consultation.md detection rules:
validate_workflow_integration(domain_plugin_path, domain_label)
```
## Error Handling

View File

@@ -35,9 +35,7 @@ Rules for validating plugin compatibility and agent definitions.
2. Gate command produces binary PASS/FAIL output
3. Review command exists (WARNING if missing, not ERROR)
4. Advisory agent exists referencing the domain label
5. Gate command declares `gate_contract` version in frontmatter
6. If expected version provided, gate contract version matches expected
- Severity: ERROR for missing gate, WARNING for missing review/agent or contract mismatch, INFO for missing contract
- Severity: ERROR for missing gate, WARNING for missing review/agent
## Severity Levels

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
---
description: Data integrity compliance gate (pass/fail) for sprint execution
gate_contract: v1
arguments:
- name: path
description: File or directory to validate

View File

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
2026-01-30T14:32:53 | skills | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/skills/setup-workflows.md | README.md
2026-01-30T14:32:53 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/setup.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-01-30T14:32:54 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/debug.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-01-30T14:32:54 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/test.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md
2026-01-30T14:33:13 | commands | /home/lmiranda/claude-plugins-work/plugins/projman/commands/sprint-status.md | docs/COMMANDS-CHEATSHEET.md README.md

View File

@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ You are the **Code Reviewer Agent** - a thorough, practical reviewer who ensures
- skills/review-checklist.md
- skills/test-standards.md
- skills/sprint-lifecycle.md
- skills/visual-output.md
## Your Personality
@@ -30,10 +28,14 @@ You are the **Code Reviewer Agent** - a thorough, practical reviewer who ensures
## Visual Output
See `skills/visual-output.md` for header templates. Use the **Code Reviewer** row from the Phase Registry:
- Phase Emoji: Magnifier
- Phase Name: REVIEW
- Context: Sprint Name
Display header at start of every response:
```
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ 📋 PROJMAN ║
║ 🏁 CLOSING ║
║ Code Review ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
```
## Your Responsibilities

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ You are the **Executor Agent** - an implementation-focused specialist who writes
- skills/progress-tracking.md
- skills/runaway-detection.md
- skills/lessons-learned.md
- skills/visual-output.md
## Your Personality
@@ -33,10 +32,14 @@ You are the **Executor Agent** - an implementation-focused specialist who writes
## Visual Output
See `skills/visual-output.md` for header templates. Use the **Executor** row from the Phase Registry:
- Phase Emoji: Wrench
- Phase Name: IMPLEMENTING
- Context: Issue Title
Display header at start of every response:
```
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ 📋 PROJMAN ║
║ ⚡ EXECUTION ║
║ [Issue Title] ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
```
## Your Responsibilities

View File

@@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ You are the **Orchestrator Agent** - a concise, action-oriented coordinator who
- skills/runaway-detection.md
- skills/wiki-conventions.md
- skills/domain-consultation.md
- skills/sprint-lifecycle.md
- skills/visual-output.md
## Your Personality
@@ -38,17 +36,28 @@ You are the **Orchestrator Agent** - a concise, action-oriented coordinator who
## Visual Output
See `skills/visual-output.md` for header templates. Use the **Orchestrator** row from the Phase Registry:
- Phase Emoji: Lightning
- Phase Name: EXECUTION
- Context: Sprint Name
Display header at start of every response:
```
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ 📋 PROJMAN ║
║ ⚡ EXECUTION ║
║ [Sprint Name] ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
```
Also use the Progress Block format from `skills/visual-output.md` during sprint execution.
Progress block format:
```
┌─ Sprint Progress ────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [Sprint Name] │
│ ████████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 40% complete │
│ ✅ Done: 4 ⏳ Active: 2 ⬚ Pending: 4 │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Your Responsibilities
### 1. Verify Approval (Sprint Start)
Execute `skills/sprint-approval.md` - Check milestone for approval record. **STOP execution if approval is missing** unless user provided `--force` flag.
Execute `skills/sprint-approval.md` - Check milestone for approval record.
### 2. Detect Checkpoints (Sprint Start)
Check for resume points from interrupted sessions.
@@ -96,13 +105,6 @@ Execute `skills/wiki-conventions.md` - Update implementation status.
### 10. Git Operations (Sprint Close)
Execute `skills/git-workflow.md` - Merge, tag, clean up branches.
### 11. Maintain Dispatch Log
Execute `skills/progress-tracking.md` (Sprint Dispatch Log section):
- Create dispatch log header at sprint start
- Append row on every task dispatch, completion, failure, and domain gate check
- On sprint resume: add "Resumed" row with checkpoint context
- Log is posted as comments, one `add_comment` per event
## Critical Reminders
1. **NEVER use CLI tools** - Use MCP tools exclusively (see `skills/mcp-tools-reference.md`)

View File

@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ You are the **Planner Agent** - a methodical architect who thoroughly analyzes r
- skills/planning-workflow.md
- skills/label-taxonomy/labels-reference.md
- skills/domain-consultation.md
- skills/sprint-lifecycle.md
- skills/visual-output.md
## Your Personality
@@ -40,10 +38,14 @@ You are the **Planner Agent** - a methodical architect who thoroughly analyzes r
## Visual Output
See `skills/visual-output.md` for header templates. Use the **Planner** row from the Phase Registry:
- Phase Emoji: Target
- Phase Name: PLANNING
- Context: Sprint Name or Goal
Display header at start of every response:
```
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ 📋 PROJMAN ║
║ 🎯 PLANNING ║
║ [Sprint Name or Goal] ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
```
## Your Responsibilities

View File

@@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ This project uses the **projman** plugin for sprint planning and project managem
| `/sprint-close` | Complete sprint and capture lessons learned to Gitea Wiki |
| `/labels-sync` | Synchronize label taxonomy from Gitea |
| `/initial-setup` | Run initial setup for projman plugin |
| `/rfc create` | Create new RFC from conversation or clarified spec |
| `/rfc list` | List all RFCs grouped by status |
| `/rfc review` | Submit Draft RFC for review |
| `/rfc approve` | Approve RFC for sprint planning |
| `/rfc reject` | Reject RFC with documented reason |
| `/rfc-create` | Create new RFC from conversation or clarified spec |
| `/rfc-list` | List all RFCs grouped by status |
| `/rfc-review` | Submit Draft RFC for review |
| `/rfc-approve` | Approve RFC for sprint planning |
| `/rfc-reject` | Reject RFC with documented reason |
### MCP Tools Available

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
---
description: Clear plugin cache to force fresh configuration reload after marketplace updates
---
# Clear Cache
## Purpose
Clear plugin cache to force fresh configuration reload after marketplace updates.
## When to Use
- After updating the marketplace (`git pull` or reinstall)
- When MCP servers show stale configuration
- When plugin changes don't take effect
## Workflow
Execute cache clear:
```bash
rm -rf ~/.claude/plugins/cache/leo-claude-mktplace/
```
Then inform user: "Cache cleared. Restart Claude Code for changes to take effect."
## Visual Output
```
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ 📋 PROJMAN ║
║ Clear Cache ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
```

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ agent: code-reviewer
## Skills Required
- skills/review-checklist.md
- skills/sprint-lifecycle.md
## Purpose
@@ -20,7 +19,6 @@ Run `/review` before `/sprint-close` to catch issues.
## Workflow
0. **Check Lifecycle State** - Execute `skills/sprint-lifecycle.md` check protocol. Expect `Sprint/Executing`. Set `Sprint/Reviewing` after review begins. Warn if in wrong state (allow with `--force`).
1. **Determine Scope** - Sprint files or recent commits (`git diff --name-only HEAD~5`)
2. **Read Files** - Use Read tool for each file in scope
3. **Scan for Patterns** - Check each category from review checklist

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
---
description: Approve an RFC in Review status, making it ready for sprint planning
agent: planner
---
# Approve RFC
## Skills Required
- skills/mcp-tools-reference.md
- skills/rfc-workflow.md
- skills/rfc-templates.md
## Purpose
Transition an RFC from Review to Approved status, indicating the proposal has been accepted and is ready for implementation in an upcoming sprint.
## Invocation
Run `/rfc-approve <number>` where number is the RFC number:
- `/rfc-approve 0003`
- `/rfc-approve 3` (leading zeros optional)
## Workflow
1. **Validate RFC Number**
- Normalize input (add leading zeros if needed)
- Fetch RFC page: `RFC-NNNN: *`
2. **Check Current Status**
- Parse frontmatter to get current status
- **STOP** if status is not "Review"
- Error: "RFC-NNNN is in [status] status. Only RFCs in Review can be approved."
3. **Gather Decision Details**
- Prompt: "Please provide the approval rationale (why is this RFC being approved?):"
- This becomes the Decision section content
4. **Update RFC Page**
- Change status: Review → Approved
- Update "Updated" date
- Add/update Decision section:
```markdown
## Decision
**Decision:** Approved
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Decided By:** @[current user or maintainer]
**Rationale:**
[User-provided rationale]
```
5. **Update RFC-Index**
- Remove entry from "## In Review" section
- Add entry to "## Approved" section
6. **Confirm Approval**
- Display updated status
- Note that RFC is now available for `/sprint-plan`
## Visual Output
```
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PROJMAN - RFC Approval |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
RFC-0003: Feature X has been approved!
Status: Review → Approved
Decision recorded in RFC page.
This RFC is now available for sprint planning.
Use /sprint-plan and select this RFC when prompted.
```
## Validation Errors
- **RFC not found**: "RFC-NNNN not found. Check the number with /rfc-list"
- **Wrong status**: "RFC-NNNN is [status]. Only RFCs in Review can be approved."
- **No rationale provided**: "Approval rationale is required. Please explain why this RFC is being approved."

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
---
description: Create a new RFC (Request for Comments) from conversation or clarified specification
agent: planner
---
# Create RFC
## Skills Required
- skills/mcp-tools-reference.md
- skills/rfc-workflow.md
- skills/rfc-templates.md
## Purpose
Create a new RFC wiki page to track a feature idea, proposal, or enhancement through the review lifecycle. RFCs provide a structured way to document, discuss, and approve changes before implementation.
## Invocation
Run `/rfc-create` with optional context:
- After `/clarify` to convert clarified spec to RFC
- With description of feature idea
- From conversation context
## Workflow
1. **Gather Input**
- Check if conversation has clarified specification (from `/clarify`)
- If no context: prompt for Summary, Motivation, and initial Design
- Extract author from context or prompt
2. **Allocate RFC Number**
- Call `allocate_rfc_number` MCP tool
- Get next sequential 4-digit number
3. **Create RFC Page**
- Use template from `skills/rfc-templates.md`
- Fill in frontmatter (number, title, status=Draft, author, dates)
- Populate Summary, Motivation, Detailed Design sections
- Create wiki page: `RFC-NNNN: Title`
4. **Update RFC-Index**
- Fetch RFC-Index (create if doesn't exist)
- Add entry to "## Draft" section
- Update wiki page
5. **Confirm Creation**
- Display RFC number and wiki link
- Remind about next steps (refine → `/rfc-review`)
## Visual Output
```
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PROJMAN - RFC Creation |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
RFC-0001: [Title] created successfully!
Status: Draft
Wiki: [link to RFC page]
Next steps:
- Refine the RFC with additional details
- When ready: /rfc-review 0001 to submit for review
```
## Input Mapping
When converting from `/clarify` output:
| Clarify Section | RFC Section |
|-----------------|-------------|
| Problem/Context | Motivation > Problem Statement |
| Goals/Outcomes | Motivation > Goals |
| Scope/Requirements | Detailed Design > Overview |
| Constraints | Non-Goals or Detailed Design |
| Success Criteria | Testing Strategy |
## Edge Cases
- **No RFC-Index exists**: Create it with empty sections
- **User provides minimal input**: Create minimal RFC template, note sections to fill
- **Duplicate title**: Proceed (RFC numbers are unique, titles don't need to be)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
---
description: List all RFCs grouped by status from RFC-Index wiki page
agent: planner
---
# List RFCs
## Skills Required
- skills/mcp-tools-reference.md
- skills/rfc-workflow.md
## Purpose
Display all RFCs grouped by their lifecycle status. Highlights "Approved" RFCs that are ready for sprint planning.
## Invocation
Run `/rfc-list` to see all RFCs.
Optional filters:
- `/rfc-list approved` - Show only approved RFCs
- `/rfc-list draft` - Show only draft RFCs
- `/rfc-list review` - Show only RFCs in review
## Workflow
1. **Fetch RFC-Index**
- Call `get_wiki_page` for "RFC-Index"
- Handle missing index gracefully
2. **Parse Sections**
- Extract tables from each status section
- Parse RFC number, title, and metadata from each row
3. **Display Results**
- Group by status
- Highlight Approved section (ready for planning)
- Show counts per status
## Visual Output
```
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PROJMAN - RFC Index |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
## Approved (Ready for Sprint Planning)
| RFC | Title | Champion | Created |
|-----|-------|----------|---------|
| RFC-0003 | Feature X | @user | 2026-01-15 |
| RFC-0007 | Enhancement Y | @user | 2026-01-28 |
## In Review (2)
| RFC | Title | Author | Created |
|-----|-------|--------|---------|
| RFC-0004 | Feature Y | @user | 2026-01-20 |
| RFC-0008 | Idea Z | @user | 2026-01-29 |
## Draft (3)
| RFC | Title | Author | Created |
|-----|-------|--------|---------|
| RFC-0005 | Concept A | @user | 2026-01-22 |
| RFC-0009 | Proposal B | @user | 2026-01-30 |
| RFC-0010 | Sketch C | @user | 2026-01-30 |
## Implementing (1)
| RFC | Title | Sprint | Started |
|-----|-------|--------|---------|
| RFC-0002 | Feature W | Sprint 18 | 2026-01-22 |
## Implemented (1)
| RFC | Title | Completed | Release |
|-----|-------|-----------|---------|
| RFC-0001 | Initial Feature | 2026-01-10 | v5.0.0 |
## Rejected (0)
(none)
## Stale (0)
(none)
---
Total: 10 RFCs | 2 Approved | 1 Implementing
```
## Edge Cases
- **No RFC-Index**: Display message "No RFCs yet. Create one with /rfc-create"
- **Empty sections**: Show "(none)" for empty status categories
- **Filter applied**: Only show matching section, still show total counts

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
---
description: Reject an RFC with documented reason, marking it as declined
agent: planner
---
# Reject RFC
## Skills Required
- skills/mcp-tools-reference.md
- skills/rfc-workflow.md
- skills/rfc-templates.md
## Purpose
Transition an RFC to Rejected status with a documented reason. Rejected RFCs remain in the wiki for historical reference but are marked as declined.
## Invocation
Run `/rfc-reject <number>` where number is the RFC number:
- `/rfc-reject 0006`
- `/rfc-reject 6` (leading zeros optional)
## Workflow
1. **Validate RFC Number**
- Normalize input (add leading zeros if needed)
- Fetch RFC page: `RFC-NNNN: *`
2. **Check Current Status**
- Parse frontmatter to get current status
- **STOP** if status is not "Draft" or "Review"
- Error: "RFC-NNNN is in [status] status. Only Draft or Review RFCs can be rejected."
3. **Require Rejection Reason**
- Prompt: "Please provide the rejection reason (required):"
- **STOP** if no reason provided
- Error: "Rejection reason is required to document why this RFC was declined."
4. **Update RFC Page**
- Change status: [current] → Rejected
- Update "Updated" date
- Add/update Decision section:
```markdown
## Decision
**Decision:** Rejected
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Decided By:** @[current user or maintainer]
**Reason:**
[User-provided rejection reason]
```
5. **Update RFC-Index**
- Remove entry from current section ("## Draft" or "## In Review")
- Add entry to "## Rejected" section with reason summary
6. **Confirm Rejection**
- Display updated status
- Note that RFC remains in wiki for reference
## Visual Output
```
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PROJMAN - RFC Rejection |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
RFC-0006: Proposed Feature has been rejected.
Status: Review → Rejected
Reason: Out of scope for current project direction
The RFC remains in the wiki for historical reference.
If circumstances change, a new RFC can be created.
```
## Validation Errors
- **RFC not found**: "RFC-NNNN not found. Check the number with /rfc-list"
- **Wrong status**: "RFC-NNNN is [status]. Only Draft or Review RFCs can be rejected."
- **No reason provided**: "Rejection reason is required. Please document why this RFC is being declined."
## Notes
- Rejected is a terminal state
- To reconsider, create a new RFC that references the rejected one
- Rejection reasons help future contributors understand project direction

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
---
description: Submit a Draft RFC for review, transitioning status to Review
agent: planner
---
# Submit RFC for Review
## Skills Required
- skills/mcp-tools-reference.md
- skills/rfc-workflow.md
- skills/rfc-templates.md
## Purpose
Transition an RFC from Draft to Review status, indicating it's ready for maintainer evaluation. Optionally assign a champion to shepherd the RFC through review.
## Invocation
Run `/rfc-review <number>` where number is the RFC number:
- `/rfc-review 0001`
- `/rfc-review 1` (leading zeros optional)
## Workflow
1. **Validate RFC Number**
- Normalize input (add leading zeros if needed)
- Fetch RFC page: `RFC-NNNN: *`
2. **Check Current Status**
- Parse frontmatter to get current status
- **STOP** if status is not "Draft"
- Error: "RFC-NNNN is in [status] status. Only Draft RFCs can be submitted for review."
3. **Validate Minimum Content**
- Check for Summary section (required)
- Check for Motivation section (required)
- Check for Detailed Design > Overview (required)
- Warn if Alternatives Considered is empty
4. **Optional: Assign Champion**
- Ask: "Would you like to assign a champion? (Enter username or skip)"
- Champion is responsible for driving the RFC through review
5. **Update RFC Page**
- Change status: Draft → Review
- Update "Updated" date
- Set Champion if provided
- Add Review Notes section if not present
6. **Update RFC-Index**
- Remove entry from "## Draft" section
- Add entry to "## In Review" section
7. **Confirm Transition**
- Display updated status
- Note next steps (review discussion, then /rfc-approve or /rfc-reject)
## Visual Output
```
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PROJMAN - RFC Review Submission |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
RFC-0005: Feature Idea submitted for review
Status: Draft → Review
Champion: @assigned_user (or: unassigned)
Updated: RFC-Index
Next steps:
- Discuss in RFC wiki page comments or meetings
- When decision reached: /rfc-approve 0005 or /rfc-reject 0005
```
## Validation Errors
- **RFC not found**: "RFC-NNNN not found. Check the number with /rfc-list"
- **Wrong status**: "RFC-NNNN is [status]. Only Draft RFCs can be reviewed."
- **Missing sections**: "RFC-NNNN is missing required sections: [list]. Please complete before review."

View File

@@ -1,144 +0,0 @@
---
description: RFC lifecycle management - create, list, review, approve, reject
agent: planner
---
# RFC Management
## Skills Required
- skills/mcp-tools-reference.md
- skills/rfc-workflow.md
- skills/rfc-templates.md
## Purpose
Manage the full RFC lifecycle through sub-commands. RFCs provide a structured way to document, discuss, and approve changes before implementation.
## Invocation
```
/rfc <sub-command> [arguments]
```
### Sub-Commands
| Sub-Command | Usage | Description |
|-------------|-------|-------------|
| `create` | `/rfc create` | Create new RFC from conversation or clarified spec |
| `list` | `/rfc list [filter]` | List all RFCs grouped by status |
| `review` | `/rfc review <number>` | Submit Draft RFC for review |
| `approve` | `/rfc approve <number>` | Approve RFC in Review status |
| `reject` | `/rfc reject <number>` | Reject RFC with documented reason |
---
## Sub-Command: create
Create a new RFC wiki page to track a feature idea through the review lifecycle.
**Workflow:**
1. Check if conversation has clarified specification (from `/clarify`)
2. If no context: prompt for Summary, Motivation, and initial Design
3. Call `allocate_rfc_number` MCP tool for next sequential number
4. Create RFC page using template from `skills/rfc-templates.md`
5. Update RFC-Index wiki page (create if doesn't exist)
6. Display RFC number, wiki link, and next steps
**Input Mapping (from /clarify):**
| Clarify Section | RFC Section |
|-----------------|-------------|
| Problem/Context | Motivation > Problem Statement |
| Goals/Outcomes | Motivation > Goals |
| Scope/Requirements | Detailed Design > Overview |
| Constraints | Non-Goals or Detailed Design |
| Success Criteria | Testing Strategy |
**Edge cases:**
- No RFC-Index exists: Create it with empty sections
- User provides minimal input: Create minimal RFC template, note sections to fill
- Duplicate title: Proceed (RFC numbers are unique, titles don't need to be)
---
## Sub-Command: list
Display all RFCs grouped by lifecycle status.
**Filters:** `/rfc list approved`, `/rfc list draft`, `/rfc list review`
**Workflow:**
1. Fetch RFC-Index wiki page via `get_wiki_page`
2. Parse tables from each status section
3. Display grouped by status, highlight Approved section
4. Show counts per status
**Edge cases:**
- No RFC-Index: "No RFCs yet. Create one with `/rfc create`"
- Empty sections: Show "(none)"
---
## Sub-Command: review
Submit a Draft RFC for review, transitioning status to Review.
**Usage:** `/rfc review <number>` (leading zeros optional)
**Workflow:**
1. Validate RFC number, fetch page
2. Check status is Draft - STOP if not
3. Validate minimum content (Summary, Motivation, Detailed Design > Overview required)
4. Optionally assign champion
5. Update RFC page: status Draft -> Review, update date
6. Update RFC-Index: move from Draft to In Review section
---
## Sub-Command: approve
Approve an RFC in Review status for sprint planning.
**Usage:** `/rfc approve <number>` (leading zeros optional)
**Workflow:**
1. Validate RFC number, fetch page
2. Check status is Review - STOP if not
3. Gather approval rationale (required)
4. Update RFC page: status Review -> Approved, add Decision section
5. Update RFC-Index: move from In Review to Approved section
---
## Sub-Command: reject
Reject an RFC with documented reason.
**Usage:** `/rfc reject <number>` (leading zeros optional)
**Workflow:**
1. Validate RFC number, fetch page
2. Check status is Draft or Review - STOP if not
3. Require rejection reason (mandatory)
4. Update RFC page: status -> Rejected, add Decision section
5. Update RFC-Index: move to Rejected section
---
## Visual Output
```
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PROJMAN - RFC [Sub-Command] |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
---
## Validation Errors (All Sub-Commands)
- **RFC not found**: "RFC-NNNN not found. Check the number with `/rfc list`"
- **Wrong status**: "RFC-NNNN is in [status] status. [Specific allowed statuses for this action]."
- **Missing required input**: Specific message per sub-command
- **No sub-command provided**: Display sub-command reference table

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ Unified setup command for all configuration needs.
/setup --full # Full wizard (MCP + system + project)
/setup --quick # Project-only setup
/setup --sync # Update after repo move
/setup --clear-cache # Clear plugin cache (between sessions only)
```
## Mode Detection
@@ -80,21 +79,6 @@ Steps:
6. Update `.env`
7. Confirm
## Mode: Clear Cache (--clear-cache)
Clear plugin cache to force fresh configuration reload.
**WARNING:** Only run between sessions, never mid-session. Clearing cache mid-session destroys MCP tool venv paths and breaks all MCP operations.
Steps:
1. Execute: `rm -rf ~/.claude/plugins/cache/leo-claude-mktplace/`
2. Inform user: "Cache cleared. Restart Claude Code for changes to take effect."
When to use:
- After updating the marketplace (`git pull` or reinstall)
- When MCP servers show stale configuration
- When plugin changes don't take effect
## Visual Output
```

View File

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ agent: orchestrator
- skills/rfc-workflow.md
- skills/progress-tracking.md
- skills/git-workflow.md
- skills/sprint-lifecycle.md
## Purpose
@@ -27,7 +26,6 @@ Run `/sprint-close` when sprint work is complete.
Execute the sprint close workflow:
0. **Check Lifecycle State** - Execute `skills/sprint-lifecycle.md` check protocol. Expect `Sprint/Reviewing`. Clear all Sprint/* labels (return to idle) at the END of close workflow, after all other steps. Warn if in wrong state (allow with `--force`).
1. **Review Sprint Completion** - Verify issues closed or moved to backlog
2. **Capture Lessons Learned** - Interview user about challenges and insights
3. **Tag for Discoverability** - Apply technology, component, and pattern tags

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ agent: planner
- skills/sprint-approval.md
- skills/planning-workflow.md
- skills/label-taxonomy/labels-reference.md
- skills/sprint-lifecycle.md
## Purpose
@@ -36,7 +35,6 @@ Provide sprint goals as natural language input, or prepare input via:
Execute the planning workflow as defined in `skills/planning-workflow.md`.
**Key steps:**
0. **Check Lifecycle State** - Execute `skills/sprint-lifecycle.md` check protocol. Expect idle state. Set `Sprint/Planning` after planning completes. Warn and stop if sprint is in another active state (unless `--force`).
1. Run pre-planning validations (branch, repo org, labels)
2. Detect input source (file, wiki, or conversation)
3. Search relevant lessons learned

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ agent: orchestrator
- skills/git-workflow.md
- skills/progress-tracking.md
- skills/runaway-detection.md
- skills/sprint-lifecycle.md
## Purpose
@@ -25,14 +24,11 @@ Initiate sprint execution. The orchestrator agent verifies approval, analyzes de
Run `/sprint-start` when ready to begin executing a planned sprint.
**Flags:**
- `--force` — Bypass approval gate (emergency only, logged to milestone)
## Workflow
Execute the sprint start workflow:
1. **Verify Sprint Approval & Lifecycle State** (required) - Check milestone for approval record. STOP if missing unless `--force` flag provided. Also verify lifecycle state is `Sprint/Planning` per `skills/sprint-lifecycle.md`. Set `Sprint/Executing` after verification passes.
1. **Verify Sprint Approval** (recommended) - Check milestone for approval record
2. **Detect Checkpoints** - Check for resume points from interrupted sessions
3. **Fetch Sprint Issues** - Get open issues from milestone
4. **Analyze Dependencies** - Use `get_execution_order` for parallel batches

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ description: Check current sprint progress, identify blockers, optionally genera
- skills/mcp-tools-reference.md
- skills/progress-tracking.md
- skills/dependency-management.md
- skills/sprint-lifecycle.md
## Purpose
@@ -24,7 +23,6 @@ Check current sprint progress, identify blockers, and show execution status. Opt
## Workflow
0. **Display Lifecycle State** - Read current Sprint/* state from milestone description per `skills/sprint-lifecycle.md` and display in output header.
1. **Fetch Sprint Issues** - Get all issues for current milestone
2. **Calculate Progress** - Count completed vs total issues
3. **Identify Active Tasks** - Find issues with `Status/In-Progress`

View File

@@ -93,78 +93,6 @@ Generate comprehensive tests for specified code.
See `skills/test-standards.md` for test patterns and structure.
### DO NOT (Generate Mode)
- Install dependencies without asking first
- Generate tests that import private/internal functions not meant for testing
- Overwrite existing test files without confirmation
- Generate tests with hardcoded values that should be environment-based
---
## Sprint Integration
The `/test` command plays a critical role in the sprint close workflow:
1. After `/review` identifies code quality issues
2. Before `/sprint-close` finalizes the sprint
3. The code reviewer and orchestrator reference test results when deciding if a sprint is ready to close
### Pre-Close Verification
When running `/test run` before sprint close:
1. **Identify sprint files** - Files changed in the current sprint (via git diff against development)
2. **Check test coverage** - Report which sprint files have tests and which don't
3. **Flag untested code** - Warn if new code has no corresponding tests
4. **Recommend action** - "READY FOR CLOSE" or "TESTS NEEDED: [list of untested files]"
---
## Examples
### Run all tests
```
/test run
```
Detects framework, runs full test suite, reports results.
### Run with coverage
```
/test run --coverage
```
Same as above plus coverage percentage per file.
### Generate tests for a specific file
```
/test gen src/auth/jwt_service.py
```
Analyzes the file, generates a test file at `tests/test_jwt_service.py`.
### Generate specific test type
```
/test gen src/api/routes/auth.py --type=integration
```
Generates integration tests (request/response patterns) instead of unit tests.
### Generate with specific framework
```
/test gen src/components/Card.jsx --framework=vitest
```
Uses Vitest instead of auto-detected framework.
---
## Edge Cases
| Scenario | Behavior |
|----------|----------|
| No test framework detected | List what was checked, ask user to specify test command |
| Tests fail | Report failures clearly, recommend "TESTS MUST PASS before sprint close" |
| No tests exist for sprint files | Warn with file list, offer to generate with `/test gen` |
| External services required | Ask for confirmation before running tests that need database/API |
| Mixed framework project | Detect all frameworks, ask which to run or run all |
---
## Visual Output

View File

@@ -154,12 +154,10 @@ This pattern ensures domain expertise stays in domain plugins while projman orch
## Gate Command Reference
| Domain | Gate Command | Contract | Review Command | Advisory Agent |
|--------|--------------|----------|----------------|----------------|
| Viz | `/design-gate <path>` | v1 | `/design-review <path>` | `design-reviewer` |
| Data | `/data-gate <path>` | v1 | `/data-review <path>` | `data-advisor` |
| Domain | Gate Command | Review Command | Advisory Agent |
|--------|--------------|----------------|----------------|
| Viz | `/design-gate <path>` | `/design-review <path>` | `design-reviewer` |
| Data | `/data-gate <path>` | `/data-review <path>` | `data-advisor` |
Gate commands return binary PASS/FAIL for automation.
Review commands return detailed reports for human review.
**Contract Version:** Gate commands declare `gate_contract: vN` in their frontmatter. The version in this table is what projman expects. If a gate command bumps its contract version, this table must be updated to match. The `contract-validator` plugin checks this automatically via `validate_workflow_integration`.

View File

@@ -90,18 +90,6 @@ Repository-level labels are specific to each project.
- `Tech/Vue` (#42b883) - Vue.js frontend framework
- `Tech/FastAPI` (#009688) - FastAPI backend framework
### Sprint Lifecycle (Milestone Metadata)
These are tracked as milestone description metadata, not as Gitea issue labels. They are documented here for completeness.
| Label | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| `Sprint/Planning` | Sprint planning in progress |
| `Sprint/Executing` | Sprint execution in progress |
| `Sprint/Reviewing` | Code review in progress |
**Note:** Lifecycle state is stored in milestone description as `**Sprint State:** Sprint/Executing`. See `skills/sprint-lifecycle.md` for state machine rules.
### Domain (2 labels)
Cross-plugin integration labels for domain-specific validation gates.

View File

@@ -138,49 +138,6 @@ For resume support, save checkpoints after major steps:
---
## Sprint Dispatch Log
A single structured comment on the sprint milestone that records all task dispatches and completions. This is the first place to look when resuming an interrupted sprint.
### Format
Post as a comment on the milestone (via `add_comment` on a pinned tracking issue, or as milestone description appendix):
```markdown
## Sprint Dispatch Log
| Time | Issue | Action | Agent | Branch | Notes |
|------|-------|--------|-------|--------|-------|
| 14:30 | #45 | Dispatched | Executor | feat/45-jwt | Parallel batch 1 |
| 14:30 | #46 | Dispatched | Executor | feat/46-login | Parallel batch 1 |
| 14:45 | #45 | Complete | Executor | feat/45-jwt | 47 tool calls, merged |
| 14:52 | #46 | Failed | Executor | feat/46-login | Auth test failure |
| 14:53 | #46 | Re-dispatched | Executor | feat/46-login | After fix |
| 15:10 | #46 | Complete | Executor | feat/46-login | 62 tool calls, merged |
| 15:10 | #47 | Dispatched | Executor | feat/47-tests | Batch 2 (depended on #45, #46) |
```
### When to Log
| Event | Action Column | Required Fields |
|-------|---------------|-----------------|
| Task dispatched to executor | `Dispatched` | Time, Issue, Branch, Batch info |
| Task completed | `Complete` | Time, Issue, Tool call count |
| Task failed | `Failed` | Time, Issue, Error summary |
| Task re-dispatched | `Re-dispatched` | Time, Issue, Reason |
| Domain gate checked | `Gate: PASS` or `Gate: FAIL` | Time, Issue, Domain |
| Sprint resumed | `Resumed` | Time, Notes (from checkpoint) |
### Implementation
The orchestrator appends rows to this log via `add_comment` on the first issue in the milestone (or a dedicated tracking issue). Each append is a single `add_comment` call updating the table.
**On sprint start:** Create the dispatch log header.
**On each event:** Append a row.
**On sprint resume:** Add a "Resumed" row with checkpoint context.
---
## Sprint Progress Display
```

View File

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Provides templates for RFC wiki pages and defines the required/optional sections
## When to Use
- **Commands**: `/rfc create` when generating new RFC pages
- **Commands**: `/rfc-create` when generating new RFC pages
- **Integration**: Referenced by `rfc-workflow.md` for page structure
---

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Defines the Request for Comments (RFC) system for capturing, reviewing, and trac
## When to Use
- **Planner agent**: When detecting approved RFCs for sprint planning
- **Commands**: `/rfc create`, `/rfc list`, `/rfc review`, `/rfc approve`, `/rfc reject`
- **Commands**: `/rfc-create`, `/rfc-list`, `/rfc-review`, `/rfc-approve`, `/rfc-reject`
- **Integration**: With `/sprint-plan` to select approved RFCs for implementation
---
@@ -298,11 +298,11 @@ When RFC status changes:
| Component | How It Uses RFC System |
|-----------|------------------------|
| `/rfc create` | Creates RFC page + updates RFC-Index |
| `/rfc list` | Reads and displays RFC-Index |
| `/rfc review` | Transitions Draft -> Review |
| `/rfc approve` | Transitions Review -> Approved |
| `/rfc reject` | Transitions Review/Draft -> Rejected |
| `/rfc-create` | Creates RFC page + updates RFC-Index |
| `/rfc-list` | Reads and displays RFC-Index |
| `/rfc-review` | Transitions Draft Review |
| `/rfc-approve` | Transitions Review Approved |
| `/rfc-reject` | Transitions Review/Draft Rejected |
| `/sprint-plan` | Detects Approved RFCs, transitions to Implementing |
| `/sprint-close` | Transitions Implementing -> Implemented |
| `clarity-assist` | Suggests `/rfc create` for feature ideas |
| `/sprint-close` | Transitions Implementing Implemented |
| `clarity-assist` | Suggests `/rfc-create` for feature ideas |

View File

@@ -84,17 +84,15 @@ get_milestone(repo="org/repo", milestone_id=17)
### If Approval Missing
```
🔴 SPRINT APPROVAL NOT FOUND — BLOCKED
⚠️ SPRINT APPROVAL NOT FOUND (Warning)
Sprint 17 milestone does not contain an approval record.
Execution cannot proceed without approval.
Required: Run /sprint-plan first to:
Recommended: Run /sprint-plan first to:
1. Review the sprint scope
2. Get explicit approval for execution
2. Document the approved execution plan
To override (emergency only): /sprint-start --force
This bypasses the approval gate and logs a warning to the milestone.
Proceeding anyway - consider adding approval for audit trail.
```
### If Approval Found
@@ -136,16 +134,3 @@ Request re-approval when:
- Scope expansion needed (new files, new branches)
- Dependencies change significantly
- Timeline changes require scope adjustment
---
## Force Override
The `--force` flag bypasses the approval gate for emergency situations.
When `--force` is used:
1. Log a warning comment on the milestone: "⚠️ Sprint started without approval via --force on [date]"
2. Proceed with execution
3. The sprint close will flag this as an audit concern
**Do NOT use --force** as standard practice. If you find yourself using it regularly, the planning workflow needs adjustment.

View File

@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
---
name: sprint-lifecycle
description: Sprint lifecycle state machine using milestone labels
---
# Sprint Lifecycle
## Purpose
Defines the valid sprint lifecycle states and transitions, enforced via labels on the sprint milestone. Each projman command checks the current state before executing and updates it on completion.
## When to Use
- **All sprint commands**: Check state on entry, update on exit
- **Sprint status**: Display current lifecycle state
---
## State Machine
```
idle -> Sprint/Planning -> Sprint/Executing -> Sprint/Reviewing -> idle
(sprint-plan) (sprint-start) (review) (sprint-close)
```
## State Labels
| Label | Set By | Meaning |
|-------|--------|---------|
| *(no Sprint/* label)* | `/sprint-close` or initial state | Idle - no active sprint phase |
| `Sprint/Planning` | `/sprint-plan` | Planning in progress |
| `Sprint/Executing` | `/sprint-start` | Execution in progress |
| `Sprint/Reviewing` | `/review` | Code review in progress |
**Rule:** Only ONE `Sprint/*` label may exist on a milestone at a time. Setting a new one removes the previous one.
---
## State Transition Rules
| Command | Expected State | Sets State | On Wrong State |
|---------|---------------|------------|----------------|
| `/sprint-plan` | idle (no Sprint/* label) | `Sprint/Planning` | Warn: "Sprint is in [state]. Run `/sprint-close` first or use `--force` to re-plan." Allow with `--force`. |
| `/sprint-start` | `Sprint/Planning` | `Sprint/Executing` | Warn: "Expected Sprint/Planning state but found [state]. Run `/sprint-plan` first or use `--force`." Allow with `--force`. |
| `/review` | `Sprint/Executing` | `Sprint/Reviewing` | Warn: "Expected Sprint/Executing state but found [state]." Allow with `--force`. |
| `/sprint-close` | `Sprint/Reviewing` | Remove all Sprint/* labels (idle) | Warn: "Expected Sprint/Reviewing state but found [state]. Run `/review` first or use `--force`." Allow with `--force`. |
| `/sprint-status` | Any | No change (read-only) | Display current state in output. |
---
## Checking State (Protocol)
At command entry, before any other work:
1. Fetch the active milestone using `get_milestone`
2. Check milestone description for `**Sprint State:**` line
3. Compare against expected state for this command
4. If mismatch: display warning with guidance, STOP unless `--force` provided
5. If match: proceed and update state after command completes its primary work
**Implementation:** Use milestone description metadata. Add/update a line:
```
**Sprint State:** Sprint/Executing
```
This avoids needing actual Gitea labels on milestones (which may not be supported). Parse this line to check state, update it to set state.
---
## Setting State
After command completes successfully:
1. Fetch current milestone description
2. If `**Sprint State:**` line exists, replace it
3. If not, append it to the end of the description
4. Update milestone via `update_milestone`
**Format:** `**Sprint State:** <state>` where state is one of:
- `Sprint/Planning`
- `Sprint/Executing`
- `Sprint/Reviewing`
- (empty/removed for idle)
---
## Displaying State
In `/sprint-status` output, include:
```
Sprint Phase: Executing (since 2026-02-01)
```
Parse the milestone description for the `**Sprint State:**` line and display it prominently.
---
## Edge Cases
- **No active milestone**: State is implicitly `idle`
- **Multiple milestones**: Use the open/active milestone. If multiple open, use the most recent.
- **Milestone has no state line**: Treat as `idle`
- **`--force` used**: Log to milestone: "Warning: Lifecycle state override: [command] forced from [actual] state on [date]"

View File

@@ -1,101 +0,0 @@
---
name: visual-output
description: Standard visual formatting for projman commands and agents
---
# Visual Output Standards
## Purpose
Single source of truth for all projman visual headers, progress blocks, and verdict formats. All agents and commands reference this skill instead of defining their own templates.
---
## Plugin Header (Double-Line)
Projman uses the double-line box drawing header style with emoji phase indicators.
### Agent Headers
```
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PROJMAN |
| [Phase Emoji] [PHASE NAME] |
| [Context Line] |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
### Phase Registry
| Agent | Phase Emoji | Phase Name | Context |
|-------|-------------|------------|---------|
| Planner | Target | PLANNING | Sprint Name or Goal |
| Orchestrator | Lightning | EXECUTION | Sprint Name |
| Executor | Wrench | IMPLEMENTING | Issue Title |
| Code Reviewer | Magnifier | REVIEW | Sprint Name |
### Command Headers (Non-Agent)
For commands that don't invoke a specific agent phase:
| Command | Phase Emoji | Phase Name |
|---------|-------------|------------|
| `/sprint-status` | Chart | STATUS |
| `/setup` | Gear | SETUP |
| `/debug` | Bug | DEBUG |
| `/labels-sync` | Label | LABELS |
| `/suggest-version` | Package | VERSION |
| `/proposal-status` | Clipboard | PROPOSALS |
| `/test` | Flask | TEST |
| `/rfc` | Document | RFC [Sub-Command] |
---
## Progress Block
Used by orchestrator during sprint execution:
```
+-- Sprint Progress -------------------------------------------------------+
| [Sprint Name] |
| [Progress bar] XX% complete |
| Done: X Active: X Pending: X |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
---
## Sprint Close Summary
```
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| PROJMAN |
| Finish Flag CLOSING |
| [Sprint Name] |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
---
## Gate Verdict Format
For domain gate results displayed by orchestrator:
```
+-- Domain Gate: [Viz/Data] -----------------------------------------------+
| Status: PASS / FAIL |
| [Details if FAIL] |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
```
---
## Status Indicators
| Indicator | Meaning |
|-----------|---------|
| Check | Complete / Pass |
| X | Failed / Blocked |
| Hourglass | In progress |
| Empty box | Pending / Not started |
| Warning | Warning |

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
---
description: Design system compliance gate (pass/fail) for sprint execution
gate_contract: v1
arguments:
- name: path
description: File or directory to validate