Files
leo-claude-mktplace/plugins/claude-config-maintainer/commands/claude-config-audit-settings.md
lmiranda 2d51df7a42 feat(marketplace): command consolidation + 8 new plugins (v8.1.0 → v9.0.0) [BREAKING]
Phase 1b: Rename all ~94 commands across 12 plugins to /<noun> <action>
sub-command pattern. Git-flow consolidated from 8→5 commands (commit
variants absorbed into --push/--merge/--sync flags). Dispatch files,
name: frontmatter, and cross-reference updates for all plugins.

Phase 2: Design documents for 8 new plugins in docs/designs/.

Phase 3: Scaffold 8 new plugins — saas-api-platform, saas-db-migrate,
saas-react-platform, saas-test-pilot, data-seed, ops-release-manager,
ops-deploy-pipeline, debug-mcp. Each with plugin.json, commands, agents,
skills, README, and claude-md-integration. Marketplace grows from 12→20.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-06 14:52:11 -05:00

205 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown

---
name: claude-config audit-settings
description: Audit settings.local.json for permission optimization opportunities
---
# /claude-config audit-settings
Audit Claude Code `settings.local.json` permissions with 100-point scoring across redundancy, coverage, safety alignment, and profile fit.
## Skills to Load
Before executing, load:
- `skills/visual-header.md`
- `skills/settings-optimization.md`
## Visual Output
```
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| CONFIG-MAINTAINER - Settings Audit |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
```
## Usage
```
/claude-config audit-settings # Full audit with recommendations
/claude-config audit-settings --diagram # Include Mermaid diagram of review layer coverage
```
## Workflow
### Step 1: Locate Settings Files
Search in order:
1. `.claude/settings.local.json` (primary target)
2. `.claude/settings.json` (shared config)
3. `~/.claude.json` project entry (legacy)
Report which format is in use.
### Step 2: Parse Permission Arrays
Extract and analyze:
- `permissions.allow` array
- `permissions.deny` array
- `permissions.ask` array (if present)
- Legacy `allowedTools` array (if legacy format)
### Step 3: Run Pattern Consolidation Analysis
Using `settings-optimization.md` Section 3, detect:
| Check | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| Duplicates | Exact same pattern appearing multiple times |
| Subsets | Narrower patterns covered by broader ones |
| Merge candidates | 4+ similar patterns that could be consolidated |
| Overly broad | Unscoped tool permissions (e.g., `Bash` without pattern) |
| Stale entries | Patterns referencing non-existent paths |
| Conflicts | Same pattern in both allow and deny |
### Step 4: Detect Active Marketplace Hooks
Read `plugins/*/hooks/hooks.json` files:
```bash
# Check each plugin's hooks
plugins/code-sentinel/hooks/hooks.json # PreToolUse security
plugins/doc-guardian/hooks/hooks.json # PostToolUse drift detection
plugins/project-hygiene/hooks/hooks.json # PostToolUse cleanup
plugins/data-platform/hooks/hooks.json # PostToolUse schema diff
plugins/contract-validator/hooks/hooks.json # Plugin validation
```
Parse each to identify:
- Hook event type (PreToolUse, PostToolUse)
- Tool matchers (Write, Edit, MultiEdit, Bash)
- Whether hook is command type (reliable) or prompt type (unreliable)
### Step 5: Map Review Layers to Directory Scopes
For each directory scope in `settings-optimization.md` Section 4:
1. Count how many review layers are verified active
2. Determine if auto-allow is justified (≥2 layers required)
3. Note any scopes that lack coverage
### Step 6: Compare Against Recommended Profile
Based on review layer count:
- 0-1 layers: Recommend `conservative` profile
- 2+ layers: Recommend `reviewed` profile
- CI/sandboxed: May recommend `autonomous` profile
Calculate profile fit percentage.
### Step 7: Generate Scored Report
Calculate scores using `settings-optimization.md` Section 6.
## Output Format
```
Settings Efficiency Score: XX/100
Redundancy: XX/25
Coverage: XX/25
Safety Alignment: XX/25
Profile Fit: XX/25
Current Profile: [closest match or "custom"]
Recommended Profile: [target based on review layers]
Issues Found:
🔴 CRITICAL: [description]
🟠 HIGH: [description]
🟡 MEDIUM: [description]
🔵 LOW: [description]
Active Review Layers Detected:
✓ code-sentinel (PreToolUse: Write|Edit|MultiEdit)
✓ doc-guardian (PostToolUse: Write|Edit|MultiEdit)
✓ project-hygiene (PostToolUse: Write|Edit)
✗ data-platform schema-diff (not detected)
Recommendations:
1. [specific action with pattern]
2. [specific action with pattern]
...
Follow-Up Actions:
1. Run /claude-config optimize-settings to apply recommendations
2. Run /claude-config optimize-settings --dry-run to preview first
3. Run /claude-config optimize-settings --profile=reviewed to apply profile
```
## Diagram Output (--diagram flag)
When `--diagram` is specified, generate a Mermaid flowchart showing:
**Before generating:** Read `/mnt/skills/user/mermaid-diagrams/SKILL.md` for diagram requirements.
**Diagram structure:**
- Left column: File operation types (Write, Edit, Bash)
- Middle: Review layers that intercept each operation
- Right column: Current permission status (auto-allowed, prompted, denied)
**Color coding:**
- PreToolUse hooks: Blue
- PostToolUse hooks: Green
- Sprint Approval: Amber
- PR Review: Purple
Example structure:
```mermaid
flowchart LR
subgraph Operations
W[Write]
E[Edit]
B[Bash]
end
subgraph Review Layers
CS[code-sentinel]
DG[doc-guardian]
PR[pr-review]
end
subgraph Permission
A[Auto-allowed]
P[Prompted]
D[Denied]
end
W --> CS
W --> DG
E --> CS
E --> DG
CS --> A
DG --> A
B --> P
classDef preHook fill:#e3f2fd
classDef postHook fill:#e8f5e9
classDef prReview fill:#f3e5f5
class CS preHook
class DG postHook
class PR prReview
```
## Issue Severity Levels
| Severity | Icon | Examples |
|----------|------|----------|
| CRITICAL | 🔴 | Unscoped `Bash` in allow, missing deny for secrets |
| HIGH | 🟠 | Overly broad patterns, missing MCP coverage |
| MEDIUM | 🟡 | Subset redundancy, merge candidates |
| LOW | 🔵 | Exact duplicates, minor optimizations |
## DO NOT
- Modify any files (this is audit only)
- Recommend `autonomous` profile unless explicitly sandboxed environment
- Recommend auto-allow for scopes with <2 verified review layers
- Skip hook verification before making recommendations