Files
leo-claude-mktplace/plugins/claude-config-maintainer/commands/analyze.md
lmiranda b5d36865ee feat(plugins): add Visual Output headers to all other plugin commands
Add single-line visual headers to 66 command files across 10 plugins:
- clarity-assist (2 commands): 💬
- claude-config-maintainer (5 commands): ⚙️
- cmdb-assistant (11 commands): 🖥️
- code-sentinel (3 commands): 🔒
- contract-validator (5 commands): 
- data-platform (10 commands): 📊
- doc-guardian (5 commands): 📝
- git-flow (8 commands): 🔀
- pr-review (7 commands): 🔍
- viz-platform (10 commands): 🎨

Each command now displays a consistent header at execution start:
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  [icon] PLUGIN-NAME · Command Description                       │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Addresses #275 (other plugin commands visual output)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-28 17:24:49 -05:00

199 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown

---
description: Analyze CLAUDE.md for optimization opportunities and plugin integration
---
# Analyze CLAUDE.md
This command analyzes your project's CLAUDE.md file and provides a detailed report on optimization opportunities and plugin integration status.
## Visual Output
When executing this command, display the plugin header:
```
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ⚙️ CONFIG-MAINTAINER · CLAUDE.md Analysis │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
Then proceed with the analysis.
## What This Command Does
1. **Read CLAUDE.md** - Locates and reads the project's CLAUDE.md file
2. **Analyze Structure** - Evaluates organization, headers, and flow
3. **Check Content** - Reviews clarity, completeness, and conciseness
4. **Identify Issues** - Finds redundancy, verbosity, and missing sections
5. **Detect Active Plugins** - Identifies marketplace plugins enabled in the project
6. **Check Plugin Integration** - Verifies CLAUDE.md references active plugins
7. **Generate Report** - Provides scored assessment with recommendations
## Usage
```
/config-analyze
```
Or invoke the maintainer agent directly:
```
Analyze the CLAUDE.md file in this project
```
## Analysis Criteria
### Structure (25 points)
- Logical section ordering
- Clear header hierarchy
- Easy navigation
- Appropriate grouping
### Clarity (25 points)
- Clear instructions
- Good examples
- Unambiguous language
- Appropriate detail level
### Completeness (25 points)
- Project overview present
- Quick start commands documented
- Critical rules highlighted
- Key workflows covered
### Conciseness (25 points)
- No unnecessary repetition
- Efficient information density
- Appropriate length for project size
- No generic filler content
## Plugin Integration Analysis
After the content analysis, the command detects and analyzes marketplace plugin integration:
### Detection Method
1. **Read `.claude/settings.local.json`** - Check for enabled MCP servers
2. **Map MCP servers to plugins** - Use marketplace registry to identify active plugins:
- `gitea` → projman
- `netbox` → cmdb-assistant
3. **Check for hooks** - Identify hook-based plugins (project-hygiene)
4. **Scan CLAUDE.md** - Look for plugin integration content
### Plugin Coverage Scoring
For each detected plugin, verify CLAUDE.md contains:
- Plugin section header or mention
- Available commands documentation
- MCP tools reference (if applicable)
- Usage guidelines
Coverage is reported as percentage: `(plugins referenced / plugins detected) * 100`
## Expected Output
```
CLAUDE.md Analysis Report
=========================
File: /path/to/project/CLAUDE.md
Lines: 245
Last Modified: 2025-01-18
Overall Score: 72/100
Category Scores:
- Structure: 20/25 (Good)
- Clarity: 18/25 (Good)
- Completeness: 22/25 (Excellent)
- Conciseness: 12/25 (Needs Work)
Strengths:
+ Clear project overview with good context
+ Critical rules prominently displayed
+ Comprehensive coverage of workflows
Issues Found:
1. [HIGH] Verbose explanations (lines 45-78)
Section "Running Tests" has 34 lines that could be 8 lines.
Impact: Harder to scan, important info buried
2. [MEDIUM] Duplicate content (lines 102-115, 189-200)
Same git workflow documented twice.
Impact: Maintenance burden, inconsistency risk
3. [MEDIUM] Missing Quick Start section
No clear "how to get started" instructions.
Impact: Slower onboarding for Claude
4. [LOW] Inconsistent header formatting
Mix of "## Title" and "## Title:" styles.
Impact: Minor readability issue
Recommendations:
1. Add Quick Start section at top (priority: high)
2. Condense Testing section to essentials (priority: high)
3. Remove duplicate git workflow (priority: medium)
4. Standardize header formatting (priority: low)
Estimated improvement: 15-20 points after changes
---
Plugin Integration Analysis
===========================
Detected Active Plugins:
✓ projman (via gitea MCP server)
✓ cmdb-assistant (via netbox MCP server)
✓ project-hygiene (via PostToolUse hook)
Plugin Coverage: 33% (1/3 plugins referenced)
✓ projman - Referenced in CLAUDE.md
✗ cmdb-assistant - NOT referenced
✗ project-hygiene - NOT referenced
Missing Integration Content:
1. cmdb-assistant
Add infrastructure management commands and NetBox MCP tools reference.
2. project-hygiene
Add cleanup hook documentation and configuration options.
---
Would you like me to:
[1] Implement all content recommendations
[2] Add missing plugin integrations to CLAUDE.md
[3] Do both (recommended)
[4] Show preview of changes first
```
## When to Use
Run `/config-analyze` when:
- Setting up a new project with existing CLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.md feels too long or hard to use
- Claude seems to miss instructions
- Before major project changes
- Periodic maintenance (quarterly)
- After installing new marketplace plugins
- When Claude doesn't seem to use available plugin tools
## Follow-Up Actions
After analysis, you can:
- Run `/config-optimize` to automatically improve the file
- Manually address specific issues
- Request detailed recommendations for any section
- Compare with best practice templates
## Tips
- Run analysis after significant project changes
- Address HIGH priority issues first
- Keep scores above 70/100 for best results
- Re-analyze after making changes to verify improvement