- Update git remote to new Tailscale hostname - Replace old organization name (hhl-infra) with bandit - Replace old repository name (claude-code-hhl-toolkit) with support-claude-mktplace - Update all documentation references to use generic gitea.example.com - Rebrand from HyperHive Labs to Bandit Labs across all files - Rename workspace file to match new repository name 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
27 KiB
PMO Plugin Reference (projman-pmo)
Overview
The projman-pmo plugin provides multi-project PMO coordination with cross-project dependency tracking, resource allocation, and company-wide visibility. It builds on projman but operates at the organization level.
Build Order: Build AFTER projman is working and validated Target Users: PMO coordinators, engineering managers, CTOs Scope: Multi-project coordination across entire organization
Key Features:
- Cross-project status aggregation
- Dependency tracking and visualization
- Resource conflict detection
- Release coordination
- Company-wide lessons learned search
- Multi-project prioritization
Plugin Structure
projman-pmo/
├── .claude-plugin/
│ └── plugin.json # Plugin manifest
├── .mcp.json # Points to ../mcp-servers/ (company mode)
├── commands/
│ ├── pmo-status.md # Multi-project status overview
│ ├── pmo-priorities.md # Cross-project prioritization
│ ├── pmo-dependencies.md # Dependency visualization
│ ├── pmo-conflicts.md # Resource conflict detection
│ └── pmo-schedule.md # Deployment schedule coordination
├── agents/
│ └── pmo-coordinator.md # Multi-project coordination agent
└── README.md # Installation and usage guide
Plugin Manifest
File: projman-pmo/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
{
"name": "projman-pmo",
"version": "0.1.0",
"displayName": "Projman PMO - Multi-Project Coordination",
"description": "PMO coordination with cross-project visibility, dependency tracking, and resource management",
"author": "Bandit Labs",
"homepage": "ssh://git@hotserv.tailc9b278.ts.net:2222/bandit/support-claude-mktplace",
"repository": {
"type": "git",
"url": "ssh://git@hotserv.tailc9b278.ts.net:2222/bandit/support-claude-mktplace.git"
},
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"pmo",
"multi-project",
"coordination",
"dependencies",
"resource-management"
],
"minimumClaudeVersion": "1.0.0",
"main": "commands/",
"dependencies": {
"projman": ">=0.1.0"
},
"contributes": {
"commands": [
{
"name": "pmo-status",
"title": "PMO Status",
"description": "Multi-project status overview",
"file": "commands/pmo-status.md"
},
{
"name": "pmo-priorities",
"title": "PMO Priorities",
"description": "Cross-project priority analysis",
"file": "commands/pmo-priorities.md"
},
{
"name": "pmo-dependencies",
"title": "PMO Dependencies",
"description": "Project dependency visualization",
"file": "commands/pmo-dependencies.md"
},
{
"name": "pmo-conflicts",
"title": "PMO Resource Conflicts",
"description": "Resource conflict detection and resolution",
"file": "commands/pmo-conflicts.md"
},
{
"name": "pmo-schedule",
"title": "PMO Schedule",
"description": "Multi-project deployment scheduling",
"file": "commands/pmo-schedule.md"
}
],
"agents": [
{
"name": "pmo-coordinator",
"title": "PMO Coordinator",
"description": "Strategic multi-project coordination and dependency management",
"file": "agents/pmo-coordinator.md"
}
]
},
"configuration": {
"required": [
"GITEA_API_URL",
"GITEA_API_TOKEN",
"GITEA_OWNER",
"WIKIJS_API_URL",
"WIKIJS_API_TOKEN",
"WIKIJS_BASE_PATH"
],
"properties": {
"GITEA_API_URL": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Gitea API base URL (e.g., https://gitea.example.com/api/v1)"
},
"GITEA_API_TOKEN": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Gitea API token with organization-level access",
"secret": true
},
"GITEA_OWNER": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Gitea organization name"
},
"WIKIJS_API_URL": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Wiki.js GraphQL API URL (e.g., https://wiki.example.com/graphql)"
},
"WIKIJS_API_TOKEN": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Wiki.js API token with company-wide read access",
"secret": true
},
"WIKIJS_BASE_PATH": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Base path in Wiki.js (e.g., /company-name)"
}
},
"notes": {
"company_mode": "PMO plugin operates in company-wide mode. Do NOT set GITEA_REPO or WIKIJS_PROJECT environment variables."
}
}
}
Key Differences from projman:
dependencies: Declares dependency on projman plugin- No
GITEA_REPOorWIKIJS_PROJECTin configuration (company-wide mode) - Focused on coordination, not individual project management
Configuration
Plugin .mcp.json
File: projman-pmo/.mcp.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"gitea-pmo": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "mcp_server.server"],
"cwd": "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/../mcp-servers/gitea",
"env": {
"PYTHONPATH": "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/../mcp-servers/gitea",
"GITEA_API_URL": "${GITEA_API_URL}",
"GITEA_API_TOKEN": "${GITEA_API_TOKEN}",
"GITEA_OWNER": "${GITEA_OWNER}"
}
},
"wikijs-pmo": {
"command": "python",
"args": ["-m", "mcp_server.server"],
"cwd": "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/../mcp-servers/wikijs",
"env": {
"PYTHONPATH": "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/../mcp-servers/wikijs",
"WIKIJS_API_URL": "${WIKIJS_API_URL}",
"WIKIJS_API_TOKEN": "${WIKIJS_API_TOKEN}",
"WIKIJS_BASE_PATH": "${WIKIJS_BASE_PATH}"
}
}
}
}
Critical Differences from projman:
- NO
GITEA_REPO→ operates on all repositories - NO
WIKIJS_PROJECT→ operates on entire/hyper-hive-labsnamespace - Same shared MCP servers at
../mcp-servers/
Environment Variables
Required (System-Level Only):
GITEA_API_URLGITEA_API_TOKENGITEA_OWNERWIKIJS_API_URLWIKIJS_API_TOKENWIKIJS_BASE_PATH
NOT Required:
GITEA_REPO- PMO operates across all reposWIKIJS_PROJECT- PMO operates across entire namespace
PMO Coordinator Agent
File: agents/pmo-coordinator.md
Agent Personality
You are the PMO Coordinator for Bandit Labs.
Your role:
- Maintain strategic view across all projects
- Identify cross-project dependencies
- Detect resource conflicts
- Balance competing priorities
- Coordinate release timing
- Track customer deployment schedules
- Surface company-wide lessons learned
You are:
- Strategic thinker
- Dependency-aware
- Conflict detector
- Priority balancer
- Team coordinator
- NOT a micromanager
You delegate to project-level agents:
- Don't micromanage single projects
- Focus on cross-project issues
- Surface conflicts early
- Facilitate coordination
- Provide strategic guidance
Available Tools:
- aggregate_issues: Fetch issues across all repositories
- search_all_projects: Search lessons across all projects
- list_repos: Get all organization repositories
- get_shared_docs: Access company-wide patterns and best practices
Key Principles:
1. Strategic overview, not tactical details
2. Cross-project coordination, not single-project management
3. Identify conflicts before they become problems
4. Balance competing priorities across teams
5. Learn from patterns across all projects
Delegation Model
PMO Agent (projman-pmo)
├─ Identifies cross-project issues
├─ Detects resource conflicts
├─ Coordinates release timing
└─ Delegates to...
├─ Planner Agent (projman) → for project planning
├─ Orchestrator Agent (projman) → for project execution
└─ Executor Agent (projman) → for implementation
Example:
User: /pmo-status
PMO: Projects Overview:
CuisineFlow: Sprint in progress, 60% complete
└─ Blocking: CuisineFlow-Site deployment
I notice CuisineFlow-Site is waiting on API changes.
Use projman in the cuisineflow-site repo to plan the sync work.
Commands
1. PMO Status Command
File: commands/pmo-status.md
Usage: /pmo-status
Description: Consolidated view of all active projects
Flow:
User: /pmo-status
PMO: Projects Overview
================
CuisineFlow (main product)
├── Sprint: Intuit Engine Extraction
├── Status: In Progress (60%)
├── Issue: #47
├── Blockers: None
├── Next: API testing
└── Timeline: On track (1 week remaining)
CuisineFlow-Site (demo)
├── Sprint: Dashboard Updates
├── Status: Waiting on dependencies
├── Issue: #12
├── Blockers: Depends on CuisineFlow #47 (API changes)
├── Next: Deploy when API ready
└── Timeline: Blocked (waiting on CuisineFlow)
Intuit-Engine (service)
├── Sprint: Initial Setup
├── Status: Planning
├── Issue: #3
├── Blockers: Architecture decisions needed
├── Next: Service boundary definition
└── Timeline: Not started
HHL-Site (marketing)
├── Sprint: Content Updates
├── Status: Complete
├── Issue: #8 (closed)
├── Blockers: None
├── Next: Deploy to production
└── Timeline: Ready for deployment
Cross-Project Insights:
- CuisineFlow-Site blocked by CuisineFlow #47
- Intuit-Engine needs architectural guidance
- HHL-Site ready for deployment
Suggested Actions:
1. Prioritize CuisineFlow #47 completion (unblocks Site)
2. Schedule architecture review for Intuit-Engine
3. Deploy HHL-Site content updates
Success Criteria:
- Shows all active projects
- Identifies blockers
- Surfaces dependencies
- Provides actionable insights
2. PMO Priorities Command
File: commands/pmo-priorities.md
Usage: /pmo-priorities
Description: Review and adjust priorities across projects
Flow:
User: /pmo-priorities
PMO: Priority Analysis Across Projects
=================================
Critical (Blocks launches):
1. CuisineFlow #47 - Intuit Engine Extraction
→ Blocks: CuisineFlow v2.0 launch (Nov 15)
→ Blocks: CuisineFlow-Site deployment
→ Status: 60% complete, 1 week remaining
→ Recommendation: Maintain focus
High (Important features):
2. CuisineFlow-Site #12 - Dashboard Updates
→ Depends on: CuisineFlow #47
→ Status: Waiting
→ Recommendation: Begin planning, wait for #47
3. Intuit-Engine #3 - Initial Setup
→ Enables: Service architecture
→ Status: Planning phase
→ Recommendation: Schedule architecture review
Medium (Enhancements):
4. HHL-Site #8 - Content Updates
→ Status: Complete, ready to deploy
→ Recommendation: Deploy this week
Resource Analysis:
Leo (primary developer):
- Working on: CuisineFlow #47 (Critical)
- Next: CuisineFlow-Site #12 (High)
- Later: Intuit-Engine #3 (High)
⚠️ Potential Conflict:
Leo is assigned to 3 high-priority items. Consider:
- Maintaining focus on #47 (blocks launch)
- Queueing #12 for after #47 completion
- Scheduling #3 architecture review with team
Recommend any priority changes?
Success Criteria:
- Clear priority ranking
- Resource allocation visibility
- Conflict identification
- Actionable recommendations
3. PMO Dependencies Command
File: commands/pmo-dependencies.md
Usage: /pmo-dependencies
Description: Visualize and manage project dependencies
Flow:
User: /pmo-dependencies
PMO: Project Dependencies
====================
Dependency Graph:
Intuit-Engine (service)
↓ (must complete before)
CuisineFlow (main)
↓ (API changes required by)
CuisineFlow-Site (demo)
↓ (deploy together)
Customer VPS (deployments)
Detailed Dependencies:
1. CuisineFlow → Intuit-Engine
Type: Service extraction
Status: In progress
Blocker: Must complete #47 before v2.0 launch
Impact: High (blocks launch)
2. CuisineFlow → CuisineFlow-Site
Type: Feature sync
Status: Waiting
Blocker: Dashboard updates need API changes from #47
Impact: Medium (demo consistency)
3. CuisineFlow → Customer VPS
Type: Deployment
Status: Pending
Blocker: v2.0 launch must complete before customer updates
Impact: High (customer commitments)
Deployment Order:
1. Complete Intuit-Engine service extraction
2. Deploy CuisineFlow v2.0 to production
3. Sync CuisineFlow-Site demo
4. Update customer VPS instances
Critical Path:
Intuit-Engine (#3) → CuisineFlow (#47) → Site (#12) → Customer VPS
Estimated timeline: 3 weeks total
Risks:
- CuisineFlow #47 delay would cascade to all downstream
- Customer VPS updates have Nov 20 deadline
Success Criteria:
- Dependencies clearly visualized
- Critical path identified
- Deployment order defined
- Risks highlighted
4. PMO Conflicts Command
File: commands/pmo-conflicts.md
Usage: /pmo-conflicts
Description: Detect and resolve resource conflicts
Flow:
User: /pmo-conflicts
PMO: Resource Conflict Analysis
==========================
⚠️ Resource Conflict Detected
Leo (Developer):
Assigned to:
- CuisineFlow #47: Intuit Engine extraction (Priority: Critical)
- CuisineFlow-Site #12: Dashboard redesign (Priority: High)
- HHL-Site #8: Content update (Priority: Medium)
- Intuit-Engine #3: Service setup (Priority: High)
Conflict Analysis:
- 4 active assignments across 3 projects
- 2 are high priority or above
- Estimated total effort: 4 weeks
- Timeline: 2 weeks available
Recommendations:
1. FOCUS: CuisineFlow #47 (Critical, blocks launch)
→ Keep as primary focus
→ Estimated completion: 1 week
2. QUEUE: CuisineFlow-Site #12 (High, depends on #47)
→ Start after #47 completes
→ Natural sequencing
3. DELEGATE: HHL-Site #8 (Medium, content work)
→ Can be handled by marketing team
→ Low technical complexity
4. SCHEDULE: Intuit-Engine #3 (High, planning phase)
→ Schedule architecture review session
→ Team collaboration, not solo work
Timeline Conflict:
Without changes:
Week 1-2: CuisineFlow #47
Week 3-4: Site #12 + Engine #3 (CONFLICT)
With recommendations:
Week 1-2: CuisineFlow #47 (FOCUS)
Week 3: CuisineFlow-Site #12 (QUEUE)
Week 4: Intuit-Engine #3 (SCHEDULE)
HHL-Site #8: Marketing (DELEGATE)
Apply recommendations?
Success Criteria:
- Conflicts identified automatically
- Clear impact analysis
- Actionable recommendations
- Timeline visualization
5. PMO Schedule Command
File: commands/pmo-schedule.md
Usage: /pmo-schedule
Description: Coordinate deployment schedules
Flow:
User: /pmo-schedule
PMO: Deployment Schedule
===================
Week of Nov 6:
- CuisineFlow: Continue Sprint #47 (Intuit Engine)
- HHL-Site: Deploy content updates (#8) ✅
Week of Nov 13:
- CuisineFlow: Complete Sprint #47 ⚠️
→ Critical: Must complete by Nov 15 for launch
- CuisineFlow-Site: Begin Dashboard updates (#12)
Week of Nov 20:
- CuisineFlow: Deploy v2.0 to production 🚀
→ Deployment window: Nov 20-22
- CuisineFlow-Site: Sync demo with v2.0
- Customer VPS: Begin rollout (Deadline: Nov 20)
Week of Nov 27:
- Customer VPS: Continue rollout
- Intuit-Engine: Begin service implementation (#3)
Critical Dates:
- Nov 15: CuisineFlow v2.0 feature freeze
- Nov 20: Production deployment
- Nov 20: Customer VPS deadline
- Nov 22: Demo site sync
Dependencies:
✅ Intuit-Engine service boundaries defined
🔄 CuisineFlow #47 in progress (60%)
⏳ CuisineFlow-Site #12 waiting
⏳ Customer VPS rollout pending
Risks:
⚠️ CuisineFlow #47 delay would impact:
- v2.0 launch date (Nov 20)
- Customer VPS deadline (Nov 20)
- Demo site sync (Nov 22)
Mitigation:
- Monitor #47 progress daily
- Prepare rollback plan for customer VPS
- Communicate delays early if detected
Success Criteria:
- Clear timeline visibility
- Dependencies tracked
- Critical dates highlighted
- Risk mitigation planned
Multi-Project Coordination Workflows
Cross-Project Lessons Learned
User: Search for lessons about service extraction across all projects
PMO: Searching lessons across all projects...
Found 5 relevant lessons:
CuisineFlow:
- Sprint 08: Service boundary issues with shared DB
Tags: #service-extraction #database #refactoring
Key: Define boundaries at data model level first
- Sprint 12: API versioning during extraction
Tags: #api #versioning #refactoring
Key: Version APIs from the start
Intuit-Engine:
- Sprint 02: Circular dependencies in service init
Tags: #service-extraction #dependencies
Key: Watch for import cycles
CuisineFlow-Site:
- Sprint 05: Sync issues during backend refactor
Tags: #sync #refactoring
Key: Coordinate deployments during major changes
Shared Patterns:
- /hyper-hive-labs/shared/architecture-patterns/service-extraction
Key: Service Extraction Playbook
Common Themes:
1. Data model boundaries are critical
2. API versioning prevents integration issues
3. Watch for circular dependencies
4. Coordinate deployments during refactors
Apply these insights to current Intuit Engine extraction?
Resource Allocation
User: /pmo-status
PMO: [Shows status]
Resource Analysis:
- Leo: 3 active projects (CuisineFlow, Site, Engine)
- Marketing: 1 project (HHL-Site)
Bottleneck detected: Leo is on critical path for all technical work
Recommendations:
1. Prioritize work that unblocks others
2. Consider hiring/contracting for parallel work
3. Delegate non-critical work (HHL-Site content)
Would you like a detailed resource allocation report?
Release Coordination
User: Plan the v2.0 release across all affected projects
PMO: Release Coordination: CuisineFlow v2.0
======================================
Affected Projects:
1. CuisineFlow (main product)
2. Intuit-Engine (new service)
3. CuisineFlow-Site (demo)
4. Customer VPS instances
Pre-Release Checklist:
✅ Intuit-Engine service deployed
🔄 CuisineFlow #47 complete (60%)
⏳ Integration tests pending
⏳ Demo site updates pending
⏳ Customer migration scripts ready
Deployment Sequence:
1. Deploy Intuit-Engine service (backend)
→ Date: Nov 18
→ Duration: 2 hours
→ Rollback plan: Ready
2. Deploy CuisineFlow v2.0 (main app)
→ Date: Nov 20
→ Duration: 4 hours
→ Rollback plan: Ready
3. Sync CuisineFlow-Site (demo)
→ Date: Nov 22
→ Duration: 1 hour
→ Dependencies: Step 2 complete
4. Update Customer VPS (production instances)
→ Date: Nov 23-25
→ Duration: Phased rollout
→ Dependencies: Steps 2 and 3 complete
Communication Plan:
- Nov 15: Feature freeze announcement
- Nov 19: Deployment notification
- Nov 20: v2.0 launch announcement
- Nov 25: Completion report
Risks & Mitigation:
- Risk: #47 completion delayed
Mitigation: Daily progress checks, adjust timeline early
- Risk: Integration issues during deployment
Mitigation: Comprehensive testing, rollback plan ready
- Risk: Customer VPS migration issues
Mitigation: Phased rollout, support on standby
Company-Wide Patterns
Accessing Shared Documentation
# PMO agent can access company-wide patterns
shared_patterns = await wikijs.get_shared_docs("architecture-patterns")
# Returns:
# - microservices.md
# - api-gateway.md
# - database-per-service.md
# - service-extraction.md (created from lessons learned)
Creating Shared Patterns
User: Create a shared pattern document for service extraction
PMO: I'll create a pattern document based on lessons from:
- CuisineFlow Sprint 08
- CuisineFlow Sprint 12
- Intuit-Engine Sprint 02
Creating: /hyper-hive-labs/shared/architecture-patterns/service-extraction
Service Extraction Pattern
=========================
## When to Use
- Extracting microservice from monolith
- Creating separate deployable service
- Isolating domain boundaries
## Prerequisites
- Clear service boundaries defined
- Data model dependencies mapped
- API contracts specified
## Steps
1. Define service boundaries at data model level
2. Design and version APIs first
3. Extract data layer with foreign key awareness
4. Implement service logic
5. Update integration points
6. Deploy and test
## Common Pitfalls
- Not defining boundaries at data level first
- Missing API versioning
- Circular dependencies in initialization
- Uncoordinated deployments
## Lessons Learned
[Links to specific sprint lessons]
Created ✅
Tags: #service-extraction #microservices #refactoring #architecture
This pattern is now available to all projects.
Implementation Phases
Phase 9: PMO Plugin Foundation
Deliverable: PMO plugin requirements and design
Tasks:
- Analyze multi-project workflows
- Identify coordination pain points
- Design PMO agent scope
- Extend MCP server for multi-repo operations
- Define delegation model
Success Criteria:
- Clear PMO plugin scope
- Multi-repo queries working
- Delegation model defined
- Doesn't duplicate projman functionality
Phase 10: PMO Commands & Workflows
Deliverable: PMO-specific commands working
Tasks:
- Implement
/pmo-statuscommand - Implement
/pmo-prioritiescommand - Implement
/pmo-dependenciescommand - Implement
/pmo-conflictscommand - Implement
/pmo-schedulecommand - Build conflict detection logic
- Create dependency visualization
- Design release coordination workflow
Success Criteria:
- All commands provide valuable insights
- Dependencies clearly visualized
- Conflicts easily identified
- Coordination reduces manual overhead
Phase 11: PMO Testing & Integration
Deliverable: Validated PMO plugin integrated with projman
Tasks:
- Test with multiple projects (CuisineFlow, Site, Engine, HHL-Site)
- Simulate deployment coordination scenarios
- Test priority conflict resolution
- Validate dependency tracking
- Test cross-project lessons search
- Ensure PMO delegates to projman agents
Success Criteria:
- Handles multiple projects correctly
- Dependencies respected
- Conflicts detected and surfaced
- Seamless integration with projman
- Cross-project lessons accessible
Phase 12: Production Deployment
Deliverable: PMO plugin deployed and operational
Tasks:
- Deploy across all environments (laptop, staging, production)
- Configure for company-wide access
- Set up backup and recovery
- Establish monitoring and maintenance
- Train team on PMO capabilities
Success Criteria:
- Works in all environments
- Configuration portable
- Backup procedures documented
- Team trained and comfortable
PMO vs Projman: Key Differences
| Aspect | projman | projman-pmo |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Single repository | All repositories |
| Configuration | GITEA_REPO + WIKIJS_PROJECT |
Neither (company-wide) |
| Agents | Planner, Orchestrator, Executor | PMO Coordinator |
| Commands | Sprint-focused | Cross-project coordination |
| Gitea Access | Single repo issues | All repos issues |
| Wiki.js Access | Project path | Entire namespace |
| Primary User | Developer, Team Lead | PMO, Manager, CTO |
| Focus | Tactical execution | Strategic coordination |
| Delegation | N/A | Delegates to projman |
Usage Examples
Example 1: Detecting Blocked Work
User: /pmo-status
PMO: CuisineFlow-Site: Waiting on dependencies
Blocked by: CuisineFlow #47 (API changes)
Recommendation: Focus resources on CuisineFlow #47 to unblock Site work
Example 2: Resource Conflict Resolution
User: /pmo-conflicts
PMO: Leo assigned to 4 tasks across 3 projects
Estimated: 4 weeks work in 2 weeks timeline
Recommendations:
- Maintain focus on Critical priority (CuisineFlow #47)
- Delegate content work (HHL-Site #8) to marketing
- Schedule architectural review (Intuit-Engine #3) as team session
Example 3: Release Planning
User: /pmo-schedule
PMO: Critical Path: Engine → CuisineFlow → Site → Customer VPS
Deadline: Nov 20 (Customer VPS commitment)
Current: Week 1 of 3
Status: On track
Risk: If CuisineFlow #47 delayed, entire timeline at risk
Mitigation: Daily progress monitoring
Best Practices
1. Use PMO for Strategic View
- Don't micromanage individual projects
- Focus on cross-project issues
- Identify blockers and dependencies
- Balance competing priorities
2. Delegate to Projman
- Use projman for project-specific planning
- Let project teams handle tactical execution
- PMO provides coordination, not implementation
3. Monitor Critical Path
- Identify which work blocks others
- Focus resources on critical path items
- Communicate delays early
4. Learn Across Projects
- Search lessons across all projects
- Create shared patterns from common themes
- Build company-wide knowledge base
5. Coordinate Releases
- Plan deployments across dependent projects
- Communicate timelines clearly
- Have rollback plans ready
Troubleshooting
Issue: PMO showing wrong mode
Solution:
# Ensure GITEA_REPO and WIKIJS_PROJECT are NOT set
env | grep GITEA
env | grep WIKIJS
# Should only show:
# GITEA_API_URL, GITEA_API_TOKEN, GITEA_OWNER
# WIKIJS_API_URL, WIKIJS_API_TOKEN, WIKIJS_BASE_PATH
Issue: Can't access all repositories
Solution:
- Verify API token has organization-level access
- Check token permissions in Gitea
- Ensure GITEA_OWNER is correct
Issue: Cross-project search not working
Solution:
- Verify Wiki.js structure exists
- Check base path is correct
- Ensure projects have lessons-learned directories
Next Steps
- Complete projman plugin (Phases 1-8)
- Validate projman works with real sprints
- Begin PMO foundation (Phase 9)
- Implement PMO commands (Phase 10)
- Test with multiple projects (Phase 11)
- Deploy to production (Phase 12)