Release v5.2.0 Documentation: - Add git-flow branching strategy guide (docs/BRANCHING-STRATEGY.md) - Add clarity-assist ND support documentation (docs/ND-SUPPORT.md) - Update DEBUGGING-CHECKLIST.md with Gitea auto-close behavior and MCP restart notes - Update plugin READMEs to reference new documentation Bug Fix: - Add milestone parameter to update_issue MCP tool (gitea_client.py, server.py, tools/issues.py) Version Updates: - Marketplace version: 5.1.0 → 5.2.0 - README title: v5.1.0 → v5.2.0 - CHANGELOG: [Unreleased] → [5.2.0] - 2026-01-28 Closes #266, Closes #267, Closes #268, Closes #269 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
10 KiB
Neurodivergent Support in clarity-assist
This document describes how clarity-assist is designed to support users with neurodivergent traits, including ADHD, autism, anxiety, and other conditions that affect executive function, sensory processing, or cognitive style.
Overview
Purpose
clarity-assist exists to help all users transform vague or incomplete requests into clear, actionable specifications. For neurodivergent users specifically, it addresses common challenges:
- Executive function difficulties - Breaking down complex tasks, getting started, managing scope
- Working memory limitations - Keeping track of context across long conversations
- Decision fatigue - Facing too many open-ended choices
- Processing style differences - Preferring structured, predictable interactions
- Anxiety around uncertainty - Needing clear expectations and explicit confirmation
Philosophy
Our design philosophy centers on three principles:
- Reduce cognitive load - Never force the user to hold too much in their head at once
- Provide structure - Use consistent, predictable patterns for all interactions
- Respect different communication styles - Accommodate rather than assume one "right" way to think
Features for ND Users
1. Reduced Cognitive Load
Prompt Simplification
- The 4-D methodology (Deconstruct, Diagnose, Develop, Deliver) breaks down complex requests into manageable phases
- Users never need to specify everything upfront - clarification happens incrementally
Task Breakdown
- Large requests are decomposed into explicit components
- Dependencies and relationships are surfaced rather than left implicit
- Scope boundaries are clearly defined (in-scope vs. out-of-scope)
2. Structured Output
Consistent Formatting
- Every clarification session produces the same structured specification:
- Summary (1-2 sentences)
- Scope (In/Out)
- Requirements table (numbered, prioritized)
- Assumptions list
- This predictability reduces the mental effort of parsing responses
Predictable Patterns
- Questions always follow the same format
- Progress summaries appear at regular intervals
- Escalation (simple to complex) is always offered, never forced
Bulleted Lists Over Prose
- Requirements are presented as scannable lists, not paragraphs
- Options are numbered for easy reference
- Key information is highlighted with bold labels
3. Customizable Verbosity
Detail Levels
/clarify- Full methodology for complex requests (more thorough, more questions)/quick-clarify- Rapid mode for simple disambiguation (fewer questions, faster)
User Control
- Users can always say "that's enough detail" to end questioning early
- The plugin offers to break sessions into smaller parts
- "Good enough for now" is explicitly validated as an acceptable outcome
4. Vagueness Detection
The UserPromptSubmit hook automatically detects prompts that might benefit from clarification and gently suggests using /clarify.
Detection Signals
- Short prompts (< 10 words) without specific technical terms
- Vague action phrases: "help me", "fix this", "make it better"
- Ambiguous scope words: "somehow", "something", "stuff", "etc."
- Open questions without context
Non-Blocking Approach
- The hook never prevents you from proceeding
- It provides a suggestion with a vagueness score (percentage)
- You can disable auto-suggestions entirely via environment variable
5. Focus Aids
Task Prioritization
- Requirements are tagged as Must/Should/Could/Won't (MoSCoW)
- Critical items are separated from nice-to-haves
- Scope creep is explicitly called out and deferred
Context Switching Warnings
- When questions touch multiple areas, the plugin acknowledges the complexity
- Offers to focus on one aspect at a time
- Summarizes frequently to rebuild context after interruptions
How It Works
The UserPromptSubmit Hook
When you submit a prompt, the vagueness detection hook (hooks/vagueness-check.sh) runs automatically:
User submits prompt
|
v
Hook reads prompt from stdin
|
v
Skip if: empty, starts with /, or contains file paths
|
v
Calculate vagueness score (0.0 - 1.0)
- Short prompts: +0.3
- Vague action phrases: +0.2
- Ambiguous scope words: +0.15
- Missing technical specifics: +0.2
- Short questions without context: +0.15
|
v
If score >= threshold (default 0.6):
- Output gentle suggestion with [clarity-assist] prefix
- Show vagueness percentage
|
v
Exit 0 (always non-blocking)
Example Hook Output
[clarity-assist] Your prompt could benefit from more clarity.
[clarity-assist] Consider running /clarity-assist to refine your request.
[clarity-assist] (Vagueness score: 65% - this is a suggestion, not a block)
The 4-D Methodology
| Phase | What Happens | ND Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Deconstruct | Break request into components | Shows the full picture without overwhelming |
| Diagnose | Identify gaps and conflicts | Surfaces hidden assumptions |
| Develop | Ask structured questions | Option-based, chunked, contextual |
| Deliver | Produce specification | Consistent, scannable format |
Usage Examples
Before: Vague Request
User: Make the app faster
This triggers vagueness detection because:
- Short (4 words)
- Vague action ("make")
- No specific technical context
- No measurable outcome
After: Clarified with /clarify
User: /clarify Make the app faster
Claude: Let me help clarify what kind of performance improvements you're looking for.
**What type of slowness are you experiencing?**
1. Initial page load takes too long
2. Interactions feel sluggish (clicking, typing)
3. API calls are slow
4. All of the above
5. Other
[I'm asking because each has very different solutions]
User: 1
Claude: Initial page load - got it.
**What's an acceptable load time for you?**
1. Under 1 second (aggressive)
2. Under 2 seconds (standard)
3. Under 3 seconds (relaxed)
4. I don't have a specific target
[This helps me know whether to suggest quick wins or a major optimization effort]
After 2-3 more questions, the user receives:
## Clarified Request
### Summary
Optimize initial page load time to under 2 seconds by addressing bundle size and initial render blocking resources.
### Scope
**In Scope:**
- Bundle analysis and splitting
- Lazy loading non-critical components
- Image optimization
- CSS/JS minification check
**Out of Scope:**
- Backend API optimization
- Database query performance
- CDN setup
### Requirements
| # | Requirement | Priority | Notes |
|---|-------------|----------|-------|
| 1 | Page loads in < 2s on 4G | Must | Measured via Lighthouse |
| 2 | Largest contentful paint < 1.5s | Should | Core Web Vital |
| 3 | No layout shift after load | Should | CLS < 0.1 |
### Assumptions
- Current load time is > 3 seconds (based on "too long" description)
- Target browsers: modern evergreen (Chrome, Firefox, Safari)
- Build tooling already configured (webpack/vite)
Common Patterns Detected
| Pattern | Example | What It Triggers |
|---|---|---|
| Missing context | "Fix the bug" | "Which bug? In which file or feature?" |
| Ambiguous scope | "Update the user stuff" | "What specifically needs updating?" |
| Unclear goals | "Make it better" | "Better in what way? Faster? Cleaner? More features?" |
| Implicit knowledge | "Do it like last time" | "I don't have context from previous sessions" |
| Conflicting requests | "Keep it simple but add everything" | "Which matters more: simplicity or completeness?" |
Quick-Clarify Example
For simpler requests that just need minor disambiguation:
User: /quick-clarify Add a delete button to the user list
Claude: I'll add a delete button to each row in the user list.
**Should deletion require confirmation?**
1. Yes - show confirmation dialog (Recommended)
2. No - delete immediately
3. Soft delete - mark as deleted but keep data
[Asking because accidental deletions can be problematic]
User: 1
Claude: Got it. I'll implement a delete button with confirmation dialog. Starting now.
Configuration Options
Environment Variables
| Variable | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
CLARITY_ASSIST_AUTO_SUGGEST |
true |
Enable/disable automatic vagueness detection |
CLARITY_ASSIST_VAGUENESS_THRESHOLD |
0.6 |
Score threshold to trigger suggestion (0.0-1.0) |
Disabling Auto-Suggestions
If you find the vagueness detection unhelpful, disable it in your shell profile or .env:
export CLARITY_ASSIST_AUTO_SUGGEST=false
Adjusting Sensitivity
To make detection more or less sensitive:
# More sensitive (suggests more often)
export CLARITY_ASSIST_VAGUENESS_THRESHOLD=0.4
# Less sensitive (only very vague prompts)
export CLARITY_ASSIST_VAGUENESS_THRESHOLD=0.8
Tips for ND Users
If You're Feeling Overwhelmed
- Use
/quick-clarifyinstead of/clarifyfor faster interactions - Say "let's focus on just one thing" to narrow scope
- Ask to "pause and summarize" at any point
- It's OK to say "I don't know" - the plugin will offer concrete alternatives
If You Have Executive Function Challenges
- Start with
/clarifyeven for tasks you think are simple - it helps with planning - The structured specification can serve as a checklist
- Use the scope boundaries to prevent scope creep
If You Prefer Detailed Structure
- The 4-D methodology provides a predictable framework
- All output follows consistent formatting
- Questions always offer numbered options
If You Have Anxiety About Getting It Right
- The plugin validates "good enough for now" as acceptable
- You can always revisit and change earlier answers
- Assumptions are explicitly listed - nothing is hidden
Accessibility Notes
- All output uses standard markdown that works with screen readers
- No time pressure - take as long as you need between responses
- Questions are designed to be answerable without deep context retrieval
- Visual patterns (bold, bullets, tables) create scannable structure
Feedback
If you have suggestions for improving neurodivergent support in clarity-assist, please open an issue at:
https://gitea.hotserv.cloud/personal-projects/leo-claude-mktplace/issues
Include the label clarity-assist and describe:
- What challenge you faced
- What would have helped
- Any specific accommodations you'd like to see