Adds a new "user-reported" mode alongside the existing automated diagnostics mode. Users can now choose to: 1. Run automated diagnostics (existing behavior) 2. Report an issue they experienced while using any plugin command User-reported mode: - Step 0: Mode selection via AskUserQuestion - Step 0.1: Structured feedback gathering - Which plugin/command was affected - What the user was trying to do - What went wrong (error, missing feature, unexpected behavior, docs) - Expected vs actual behavior - Any workarounds found - Step 5.1: Smart label generation based on problem type - Step 6.1: User-friendly issue template with investigation hints This allows capturing UX issues, missing features, and documentation problems that wouldn't be caught by automated MCP tool tests. Fixes #139 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
689 lines
17 KiB
Markdown
689 lines
17 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Run diagnostics and create structured issue in marketplace repository
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Debug Report
|
|
|
|
Create structured issues in the marketplace repository - either from automated diagnostic tests OR from user-reported problems.
|
|
|
|
## Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
Your project `.env` must have:
|
|
|
|
```env
|
|
PROJMAN_MARKETPLACE_REPO=personal-projects/leo-claude-mktplace
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If not configured, ask the user for the marketplace repository path.
|
|
|
|
## CRITICAL: Execution Steps
|
|
|
|
You MUST follow these steps in order. Do NOT skip any step.
|
|
|
|
### Step 0: Select Report Mode
|
|
|
|
Use AskUserQuestion to determine what the user wants to report:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
What would you like to report?
|
|
|
|
[ ] Run automated diagnostics - Test MCP tools and report failures
|
|
[ ] Report an issue I experienced - Describe a problem with any plugin command
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store the selection as `REPORT_MODE`:
|
|
- "automated" → Continue to Step 1
|
|
- "user-reported" → Skip to Step 0.1
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Step 0.1: Gather User Feedback (User-Reported Mode Only)
|
|
|
|
If `REPORT_MODE` is "user-reported", gather structured feedback.
|
|
|
|
**Question 1: What were you trying to do?**
|
|
|
|
Use AskUserQuestion:
|
|
```
|
|
Which plugin/command were you using?
|
|
|
|
[ ] projman (sprint planning, issues, labels)
|
|
[ ] git-flow (commits, branches)
|
|
[ ] pr-review (pull request review)
|
|
[ ] cmdb-assistant (NetBox integration)
|
|
[ ] doc-guardian (documentation)
|
|
[ ] code-sentinel (security, refactoring)
|
|
[ ] Other - I'll describe it
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store as `AFFECTED_PLUGIN`.
|
|
|
|
Then ask for the specific command (free text):
|
|
```
|
|
What command or tool were you using? (e.g., /sprint-plan, virt_update_vm)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store as `AFFECTED_COMMAND`.
|
|
|
|
**Question 2: What was your goal?**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Briefly describe what you were trying to accomplish:
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store as `USER_GOAL`.
|
|
|
|
**Question 3: What went wrong?**
|
|
|
|
Use AskUserQuestion:
|
|
```
|
|
What type of problem did you encounter?
|
|
|
|
[ ] Error message - Command failed with an error
|
|
[ ] Missing feature - Tool doesn't support what I need
|
|
[ ] Unexpected behavior - It worked but did the wrong thing
|
|
[ ] Documentation issue - Instructions were unclear or wrong
|
|
[ ] Other - I'll describe it
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store as `PROBLEM_TYPE`.
|
|
|
|
Then ask for details (free text):
|
|
```
|
|
Describe what happened. Include any error messages if applicable:
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store as `PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION`.
|
|
|
|
**Question 4: Expected vs Actual**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
What did you expect to happen?
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store as `EXPECTED_BEHAVIOR`.
|
|
|
|
**Question 5: Workaround (optional)**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Did you find a workaround? If so, describe it (or skip):
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store as `WORKAROUND` (may be empty).
|
|
|
|
After gathering feedback, continue to Step 1 for context gathering, then skip to Step 5.1.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Step 1: Gather Project Context
|
|
|
|
Run these Bash commands to capture project information:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Get git remote URL
|
|
git remote get-url origin
|
|
|
|
# Get current branch
|
|
git branch --show-current
|
|
|
|
# Get working directory
|
|
pwd
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Parse the git remote to extract `REPO_NAME` in `owner/repo` format.
|
|
|
|
Store all values:
|
|
- `PROJECT_REPO`: The detected owner/repo
|
|
- `GIT_REMOTE`: Full git remote URL
|
|
- `CURRENT_BRANCH`: Current branch name
|
|
- `WORKING_DIR`: Current working directory
|
|
|
|
### Step 1.5: Detect Sprint Context
|
|
|
|
Determine if this debug issue should be associated with an active sprint.
|
|
|
|
**1. Check for active sprint milestone:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
mcp__plugin_projman_gitea__list_milestones(repo=PROJECT_REPO, state="open")
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store the first open milestone as `ACTIVE_SPRINT` (if any).
|
|
|
|
**2. Analyze branch context:**
|
|
|
|
| Branch Pattern | Context |
|
|
|----------------|---------|
|
|
| `feat/*`, `fix/*`, `issue-*` | Sprint work - likely related to current sprint |
|
|
| `main`, `master`, `development` | Production/standalone - not sprint-related |
|
|
| Other | Unknown - ask user |
|
|
|
|
**3. Determine sprint association:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
IF ACTIVE_SPRINT exists AND CURRENT_BRANCH matches sprint pattern (feat/*, fix/*, issue-*):
|
|
→ SPRINT_CONTEXT = "detected"
|
|
→ Ask user: "Active sprint detected: [SPRINT_NAME]. Is this bug related to sprint work?"
|
|
Options:
|
|
- Yes, add to sprint (will associate with milestone)
|
|
- No, standalone fix (no milestone)
|
|
→ Store choice as ASSOCIATE_WITH_SPRINT (true/false)
|
|
|
|
ELSE IF ACTIVE_SPRINT exists AND CURRENT_BRANCH is main/development:
|
|
→ SPRINT_CONTEXT = "production"
|
|
→ ASSOCIATE_WITH_SPRINT = false (standalone fix, no question needed)
|
|
|
|
ELSE:
|
|
→ SPRINT_CONTEXT = "none"
|
|
→ ASSOCIATE_WITH_SPRINT = false
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: Read Marketplace Configuration
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
grep PROJMAN_MARKETPLACE_REPO .env
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Store as `MARKETPLACE_REPO`. If not found, ask the user.
|
|
|
|
### Step 3: Run Diagnostic Suite (Automated Mode Only)
|
|
|
|
**Skip this step if `REPORT_MODE` is "user-reported"** → Go to Step 5.1
|
|
|
|
Run each MCP tool with explicit `repo` parameter. Record success/failure and full response.
|
|
|
|
**Test 1: validate_repo_org**
|
|
```
|
|
mcp__plugin_projman_gitea__validate_repo_org(repo=PROJECT_REPO)
|
|
```
|
|
Expected: `{is_organization: true/false}`
|
|
|
|
**Test 2: get_labels**
|
|
```
|
|
mcp__plugin_projman_gitea__get_labels(repo=PROJECT_REPO)
|
|
```
|
|
Expected: `{organization: [...], repository: [...], total_count: N}`
|
|
|
|
**Test 3: list_issues**
|
|
```
|
|
mcp__plugin_projman_gitea__list_issues(repo=PROJECT_REPO, state="open")
|
|
```
|
|
Expected: Array of issues
|
|
|
|
**Test 4: list_milestones**
|
|
```
|
|
mcp__plugin_projman_gitea__list_milestones(repo=PROJECT_REPO)
|
|
```
|
|
Expected: Array of milestones
|
|
|
|
**Test 5: suggest_labels**
|
|
```
|
|
mcp__plugin_projman_gitea__suggest_labels(context="Test bug fix for authentication")
|
|
```
|
|
Expected: Array of label names matching repo's format
|
|
|
|
For each test, record:
|
|
- Tool name
|
|
- Exact parameters used
|
|
- Status: PASS or FAIL
|
|
- Response or error message
|
|
|
|
### Step 4: Analyze Results (Automated Mode Only)
|
|
|
|
**Skip this step if `REPORT_MODE` is "user-reported"** → Go to Step 5.1
|
|
|
|
Count failures and categorize errors:
|
|
|
|
| Category | Indicators |
|
|
|----------|------------|
|
|
| Parameter Format | "owner/repo format", "missing parameter" |
|
|
| Authentication | "401", "403", "unauthorized" |
|
|
| Not Found | "404", "not found" |
|
|
| Network | "connection", "timeout", "ECONNREFUSED" |
|
|
| Logic | Unexpected response format, wrong data |
|
|
|
|
For each failure, write a hypothesis about the likely cause.
|
|
|
|
### Step 5: Generate Smart Labels (Automated Mode Only)
|
|
|
|
**Skip this step if `REPORT_MODE` is "user-reported"** → Go to Step 5.1
|
|
|
|
Generate appropriate labels based on the diagnostic results.
|
|
|
|
**1. Build context string for label suggestion:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
LABEL_CONTEXT = "Bug fix: " + [summary of main failure] + ". " +
|
|
"Failed tools: " + [list of failed tool names] + ". " +
|
|
"Error category: " + [detected error category from Step 4]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**2. Get suggested labels:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
mcp__plugin_projman_gitea__suggest_labels(
|
|
repo=PROJECT_REPO,
|
|
context=LABEL_CONTEXT
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**3. Merge with base labels:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
BASE_LABELS = ["Type: Bug", "Source: Diagnostic", "Agent: Claude"]
|
|
SUGGESTED_LABELS = [result from suggest_labels]
|
|
|
|
# Combine, avoiding duplicates
|
|
FINAL_LABELS = BASE_LABELS + [label for label in SUGGESTED_LABELS if label not in BASE_LABELS]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The final label set should include:
|
|
- **Always**: `Type: Bug`, `Source: Diagnostic`, `Agent: Claude`
|
|
- **If detected**: `Component: *`, `Complexity: *`, `Risk: *`, `Priority: *`
|
|
|
|
After generating labels, continue to Step 6.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Step 5.1: Generate Labels (User-Reported Mode Only)
|
|
|
|
**Only execute this step if `REPORT_MODE` is "user-reported"**
|
|
|
|
**1. Map problem type to labels:**
|
|
|
|
| PROBLEM_TYPE | Labels |
|
|
|--------------|--------|
|
|
| Error message | `Type: Bug` |
|
|
| Missing feature | `Type: Enhancement` |
|
|
| Unexpected behavior | `Type: Bug` |
|
|
| Documentation issue | `Type: Documentation` |
|
|
| Other | `Type: Bug` (default) |
|
|
|
|
**2. Map plugin to component:**
|
|
|
|
| AFFECTED_PLUGIN | Component Label |
|
|
|-----------------|-----------------|
|
|
| projman | `Component: Commands` |
|
|
| git-flow | `Component: Commands` |
|
|
| pr-review | `Component: Commands` |
|
|
| cmdb-assistant | `Component: API` |
|
|
| doc-guardian | `Component: Commands` |
|
|
| code-sentinel | `Component: Commands` |
|
|
| Other | *(no component label)* |
|
|
|
|
**3. Build final labels:**
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
BASE_LABELS = ["Source: User-Reported", "Agent: Claude"]
|
|
TYPE_LABEL = [mapped from PROBLEM_TYPE]
|
|
COMPONENT_LABEL = [mapped from AFFECTED_PLUGIN, if any]
|
|
|
|
FINAL_LABELS = BASE_LABELS + TYPE_LABEL + COMPONENT_LABEL
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
After generating labels, continue to Step 6.1.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Step 6: Generate Issue Content (Automated Mode Only)
|
|
|
|
**Skip this step if `REPORT_MODE` is "user-reported"** → Go to Step 6.1
|
|
|
|
Use this exact template:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## Diagnostic Report
|
|
|
|
**Generated**: [ISO timestamp]
|
|
**Command Tested**: [What the user was trying to run, or "general diagnostic"]
|
|
**Reporter**: Claude Code via /debug-report
|
|
|
|
## Project Context
|
|
|
|
| Field | Value |
|
|
|-------|-------|
|
|
| Repository | `[PROJECT_REPO]` |
|
|
| Git Remote | `[GIT_REMOTE]` |
|
|
| Working Directory | `[WORKING_DIR]` |
|
|
| Current Branch | `[CURRENT_BRANCH]` |
|
|
|
|
## Diagnostic Results
|
|
|
|
### Test 1: validate_repo_org
|
|
|
|
**Call**: `validate_repo_org(repo="[PROJECT_REPO]")`
|
|
**Status**: [PASS/FAIL]
|
|
**Response**:
|
|
```json
|
|
[full response or error]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Test 2: get_labels
|
|
|
|
**Call**: `get_labels(repo="[PROJECT_REPO]")`
|
|
**Status**: [PASS/FAIL]
|
|
**Response**:
|
|
```json
|
|
[full response or error - truncate if very long]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
[... repeat for each test ...]
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
- **Total Tests**: 5
|
|
- **Passed**: [N]
|
|
- **Failed**: [N]
|
|
|
|
### Failed Tools
|
|
|
|
[List each failed tool with its error]
|
|
|
|
### Error Category
|
|
|
|
[Check applicable categories]
|
|
|
|
### Hypothesis
|
|
|
|
[Your analysis of what's wrong and why]
|
|
|
|
### Suggested Investigation
|
|
|
|
1. [First file/function to check]
|
|
2. [Second file/function to check]
|
|
3. [etc.]
|
|
|
|
## Reproduction Steps
|
|
|
|
1. Navigate to `[WORKING_DIR]`
|
|
2. Run `[command that was being tested]`
|
|
3. Observe error at step [X]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
*Generated by /debug-report (automated) - Labels: Type: Bug, Source: Diagnostic, Agent: Claude*
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
After generating content, continue to Step 7.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Step 6.1: Generate Issue Content (User-Reported Mode Only)
|
|
|
|
**Only execute this step if `REPORT_MODE` is "user-reported"**
|
|
|
|
Use this template for user-reported issues:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
## User-Reported Issue
|
|
|
|
**Reported**: [ISO timestamp]
|
|
**Reporter**: Claude Code via /debug-report (user feedback)
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
| Field | Value |
|
|
|-------|-------|
|
|
| Plugin | `[AFFECTED_PLUGIN]` |
|
|
| Command/Tool | `[AFFECTED_COMMAND]` |
|
|
| Repository | `[PROJECT_REPO]` |
|
|
| Working Directory | `[WORKING_DIR]` |
|
|
| Branch | `[CURRENT_BRANCH]` |
|
|
|
|
## Problem Description
|
|
|
|
### Goal
|
|
[USER_GOAL]
|
|
|
|
### What Happened
|
|
**Problem Type**: [PROBLEM_TYPE]
|
|
|
|
[PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION]
|
|
|
|
### Expected Behavior
|
|
[EXPECTED_BEHAVIOR]
|
|
|
|
## Workaround
|
|
[WORKAROUND if provided, otherwise "None identified"]
|
|
|
|
## Investigation Hints
|
|
|
|
Based on the affected plugin/command, relevant files to check:
|
|
|
|
[Generate based on AFFECTED_PLUGIN:]
|
|
|
|
**projman:**
|
|
- `plugins/projman/commands/[AFFECTED_COMMAND].md`
|
|
- `mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/tools/*.py`
|
|
|
|
**git-flow:**
|
|
- `plugins/git-flow/commands/[AFFECTED_COMMAND].md`
|
|
|
|
**pr-review:**
|
|
- `plugins/pr-review/commands/[AFFECTED_COMMAND].md`
|
|
- `mcp-servers/gitea/mcp_server/tools/pull_requests.py`
|
|
|
|
**cmdb-assistant:**
|
|
- `plugins/cmdb-assistant/commands/[AFFECTED_COMMAND].md`
|
|
- `mcp-servers/netbox/mcp_server/tools/*.py`
|
|
- `mcp-servers/netbox/mcp_server/server.py` (tool schemas)
|
|
|
|
**doc-guardian / code-sentinel:**
|
|
- `plugins/[plugin]/commands/[AFFECTED_COMMAND].md`
|
|
- `plugins/[plugin]/hooks/*.md`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
*Generated by /debug-report (user feedback) - Labels: [FINAL_LABELS]*
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
After generating content, continue to Step 7.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Step 7: Create Issue in Marketplace
|
|
|
|
**IMPORTANT:** Always use curl to create issues in the marketplace repo. This avoids branch protection restrictions and MCP context issues that can block issue creation when working on protected branches.
|
|
|
|
**1. Load Gitea credentials:**
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
if [[ -f ~/.config/claude/gitea.env ]]; then
|
|
source ~/.config/claude/gitea.env
|
|
echo "Credentials loaded. API URL: $GITEA_API_URL"
|
|
else
|
|
echo "ERROR: No credentials at ~/.config/claude/gitea.env"
|
|
fi
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**2. Fetch label IDs from marketplace repo:**
|
|
|
|
Labels depend on `REPORT_MODE`:
|
|
|
|
**Automated mode:**
|
|
- `Source/Diagnostic` (always)
|
|
- `Type/Bug` (always)
|
|
|
|
**User-reported mode:**
|
|
- `Source/User-Reported` (always)
|
|
- Type label from Step 5.1 (Bug, Enhancement, or Documentation)
|
|
- Component label from Step 5.1 (if applicable)
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Fetch all labels from marketplace repo
|
|
LABELS_JSON=$(curl -s "${GITEA_API_URL}/repos/${MARKETPLACE_REPO}/labels" \
|
|
-H "Authorization: token ${GITEA_API_TOKEN}")
|
|
|
|
# Extract label IDs based on FINAL_LABELS from Step 5 or 5.1
|
|
# Build LABEL_IDS array with IDs of labels that exist in the repo
|
|
# Example for automated mode:
|
|
SOURCE_ID=$(echo "$LABELS_JSON" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "Source/Diagnostic") | .id')
|
|
TYPE_ID=$(echo "$LABELS_JSON" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "Type/Bug") | .id')
|
|
|
|
# Example for user-reported mode (adjust based on FINAL_LABELS):
|
|
# SOURCE_ID=$(echo "$LABELS_JSON" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "Source/User-Reported") | .id')
|
|
# TYPE_ID=$(echo "$LABELS_JSON" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "[TYPE_LABEL]") | .id')
|
|
|
|
# Build label array from found IDs
|
|
LABEL_IDS="[$(echo "$SOURCE_ID,$TYPE_ID" | sed 's/,,*/,/g; s/^,//; s/,$//')]"
|
|
echo "Label IDs to apply: $LABEL_IDS"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**3. Create issue with labels via curl:**
|
|
|
|
**Title format depends on `REPORT_MODE`:**
|
|
- Automated: `[Diagnostic] [summary of main failure]`
|
|
- User-reported: `[AFFECTED_PLUGIN] [brief summary of PROBLEM_DESCRIPTION]`
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Create temp files with restrictive permissions
|
|
DIAG_TITLE=$(mktemp -t diag-title.XXXXXX)
|
|
DIAG_BODY=$(mktemp -t diag-body.XXXXXX)
|
|
DIAG_PAYLOAD=$(mktemp -t diag-payload.XXXXXX)
|
|
|
|
# Save title (format depends on REPORT_MODE)
|
|
# Automated: "[Diagnostic] [summary of main failure]"
|
|
# User-reported: "[AFFECTED_PLUGIN] [brief summary]"
|
|
echo "[Title based on REPORT_MODE]" > "$DIAG_TITLE"
|
|
|
|
# Save body (paste Step 6 or 6.1 content) - heredoc delimiter prevents shell expansion
|
|
cat > "$DIAG_BODY" << 'DIAGNOSTIC_EOF'
|
|
[Paste the full issue content from Step 6 or 6.1 here]
|
|
DIAGNOSTIC_EOF
|
|
|
|
# Build JSON payload with labels using jq
|
|
jq -n \
|
|
--rawfile title "$DIAG_TITLE" \
|
|
--rawfile body "$DIAG_BODY" \
|
|
--argjson labels "$LABEL_IDS" \
|
|
'{title: ($title | rtrimstr("\n")), body: $body, labels: $labels}' > "$DIAG_PAYLOAD"
|
|
|
|
# Create issue using the JSON file
|
|
RESULT=$(curl -s -X POST "${GITEA_API_URL}/repos/${MARKETPLACE_REPO}/issues" \
|
|
-H "Authorization: token ${GITEA_API_TOKEN}" \
|
|
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
|
|
-d @"$DIAG_PAYLOAD")
|
|
|
|
# Extract and display the issue URL
|
|
echo "$RESULT" | jq -r '.html_url // "Error: " + (.message // "Unknown error")'
|
|
|
|
# Secure cleanup
|
|
rm -f "$DIAG_TITLE" "$DIAG_BODY" "$DIAG_PAYLOAD"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**4. If no credentials found, save report locally:**
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
REPORT_FILE=$(mktemp -t diagnostic-report-XXXXXX.md)
|
|
cat > "$REPORT_FILE" << 'DIAGNOSTIC_EOF'
|
|
[Paste the full issue content from Step 6 here]
|
|
DIAGNOSTIC_EOF
|
|
echo "Report saved to: $REPORT_FILE"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Then inform the user:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
No Gitea credentials found at ~/.config/claude/gitea.env.
|
|
|
|
Diagnostic report saved to: [REPORT_FILE]
|
|
|
|
To create the issue manually:
|
|
1. Configure credentials: See docs/CONFIGURATION.md
|
|
2. Or create issue directly at: http://gitea.hotserv.cloud/[MARKETPLACE_REPO]/issues/new
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 8: Report to User
|
|
|
|
Display summary based on `REPORT_MODE`:
|
|
|
|
**Automated Mode:**
|
|
```
|
|
Debug Report Complete
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
Project: [PROJECT_REPO]
|
|
Tests Run: 5
|
|
Passed: [N]
|
|
Failed: [N]
|
|
|
|
Failed Tools:
|
|
- [tool1]: [brief error]
|
|
- [tool2]: [brief error]
|
|
|
|
Issue Created: [issue URL]
|
|
|
|
Next Steps:
|
|
1. Switch to marketplace repo: cd [marketplace path]
|
|
2. Run: /debug-review
|
|
3. Select issue #[N] to investigate
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**User-Reported Mode:**
|
|
```
|
|
Issue Report Complete
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
Plugin: [AFFECTED_PLUGIN]
|
|
Command: [AFFECTED_COMMAND]
|
|
Problem: [PROBLEM_TYPE]
|
|
|
|
Issue Created: [issue URL]
|
|
|
|
Your feedback has been captured. The development team will
|
|
investigate and may follow up with questions.
|
|
|
|
Next Steps:
|
|
1. Switch to marketplace repo: cd [marketplace path]
|
|
2. Run: /debug-review
|
|
3. Select issue #[N] to investigate
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## DO NOT
|
|
|
|
- **DO NOT** attempt to fix anything - only report
|
|
- **DO NOT** create issues if all automated tests pass (unless in user-reported mode)
|
|
- **DO NOT** skip any diagnostic test in automated mode
|
|
- **DO NOT** call MCP tools without the `repo` parameter
|
|
- **DO NOT** skip user questions in user-reported mode - gather complete feedback
|
|
- **DO NOT** use MCP tools to create issues in the marketplace - always use curl (avoids branch restrictions)
|
|
|
|
## If All Tests Pass (Automated Mode Only)
|
|
|
|
If all 5 tests pass in automated mode, report success without creating an issue:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Debug Report Complete
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
Project: [PROJECT_REPO]
|
|
Tests Run: 5
|
|
Passed: 5
|
|
Failed: 0
|
|
|
|
All diagnostics passed. No issues to report.
|
|
|
|
If you're experiencing a specific problem, run /debug-report again
|
|
and select "Report an issue I experienced" to describe it.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting
|
|
|
|
**PROJMAN_MARKETPLACE_REPO not configured**
|
|
- Ask user: "What is the marketplace repository? (e.g., personal-projects/leo-claude-mktplace)"
|
|
- Store for this session and remind user to add to .env
|
|
|
|
**Cannot detect project repository**
|
|
- Check if in a git repository: `git rev-parse --git-dir`
|
|
- If not a git repo, ask user for the repository path
|
|
|
|
**Gitea credentials not found**
|
|
- Credentials must be at `~/.config/claude/gitea.env`
|
|
- If missing, the report will be saved locally for manual submission
|
|
- See docs/CONFIGURATION.md for setup instructions
|
|
|
|
**Labels not applied to issue**
|
|
- Verify labels exist in the marketplace repo: `Source/Diagnostic`, `Type/Bug`
|
|
- Check the label fetch output in Step 7.2 for errors
|
|
- If labels don't exist, create them first with `/labels-sync` in the marketplace repo
|