Add "lessons/sprints/sprint-2---contract-validator-plugin-implementation"

2026-01-26 20:11:37 +00:00
parent 70ee7569a3
commit f37b5dc340

@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
# Sprint 2 - contract-validator Plugin Implementation
## Metadata
- **Sprint:** Sprint 2 - contract-validator Plugin
- **Date:** 2026-01-26
- **Issues:** #185-#193 (9 issues)
- **Status:** Completed
## Context
Implemented the contract-validator plugin for cross-plugin compatibility validation and CLAUDE.md agent verification. This plugin addresses growing compatibility concerns as the marketplace expands to 12+ plugins.
## What Went Well
### 1. Real Issue Discovery
The validation tools immediately found a real compatibility issue: `/initial-setup` command is defined by three plugins (projman, data-platform, pr-review). This validates the plugin's usefulness.
### 2. Comprehensive Test Coverage
Achieved 88% average coverage across core modules:
- parse_tools.py: 79%
- validation_tools.py: 96%
- report_tools.py: 89%
### 3. Regex Pattern Refinement
Iteratively improved parsing patterns through real-world testing against existing plugins. Key refinements:
- Agent table parsing required strict `**AgentName**` format to avoid noise
- Command parsing needed to exclude table separators (`|---|`)
- Section extraction needed to capture full content until next same-level header
## Challenges & Solutions
### Challenge 1: Plugin Name Matching in Reports
**Problem:** Report tools couldn't match parsed plugin names (e.g., "Plugin One") to directory names (e.g., "plugin-one") for pairwise validation.
**Solution:** Added `_find_plugin_dir()` method that checks:
1. Exact lowercase match of directory name
2. Plugin.json `name` field match
**Prevention:** When designing lookup functions, consider all naming variations upfront.
### Challenge 2: CLAUDE.md Agent Parsing Noise
**Problem:** Initial regex picked up 62 "agents" including unrelated table rows.
**Solution:** Made pattern more strict:
- Require `**BoldName**` format in first column
- Check personality column doesn't contain backticks (tool names)
- Skip rows where personality contains "---" or looks like header
**Prevention:** Test parsers against real-world documents early, not just synthetic test data.
### Challenge 3: Branch Protection Workflow
**Problem:** Development branch has push protection, breaking the merge workflow used in Sprint 1.
**Solution:** Each issue gets its own feature branch pushed to remote. PRs created via Gitea web interface.
**Prevention:** Check branch protection settings before starting sprint execution.
## Key Decisions
1. **7 MCP Tools** - Split into parse (2), validate (3), report (2) for clear separation
2. **Pydantic Models** - Used for all structured data (PluginInterface, ValidationIssue, etc.)
3. **Dual Report Format** - Markdown for human review, JSON for programmatic use
4. **Known Data Flow Patterns** - Hardcoded producer/consumer tool lists for data flow validation
## Metrics
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Issues Completed | 9/9 |
| MCP Tools | 7 |
| Commands | 3 |
| Agents | 2 |
| Tests | 34 |
| Coverage | 88% avg |
| Real Issues Found | 1 (command conflict) |
## Recommendations for Future Sprints
1. **Address Command Conflict** - Create issue to rename `/initial-setup` in data-platform and pr-review to avoid conflict with projman
2. **Add CI Integration** - Run `/validate-contracts` in CI pipeline before merging plugin changes
3. **Expand Data Flow Patterns** - Add more producer/consumer tool mappings as plugins grow
## Tags
- contract-validator
- mcp-server
- validation
- parsing
- compatibility
---
**Tags:** contract-validator, mcp-server, validation, parsing, sprint-2, v5.0.0